Jade
Smug lives here.
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2008
- Posts
- 34,634
- Reaction score
- 53,748
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Multiple clubs?? i think not
Yes 2 clubs that were serious rather then fans gossip.
So you agree the first post is incorrect?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

StK v HAW · CAR v GEE · SYD v RIC · BL v FRE · WB v COL · MEL v GWS · WCE v ESS ·
Weekend Wrap and "Liked, Learned, Hated" right here -- How did tipping go?
Multiple clubs?? i think not
Yes 2 clubs that were serious rather then fans gossip.
It was mentioned that it was several clubs interested and it turned out speculative it was two so yes first part incorrect.So you agree the first post is incorrect?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Lance,
The fact essendon have offered to trade Hurley would hold no weight at the tribunal as its not the actual argument and doesn't effect the decision to go to the tribunal.
Youre right that there is only one question the tribunal needs to answer and that is did efc meet its contractual obligations to Hurley. If the answer is that they didn't the remedy in the contract is for Hurley to be made a dfa and that is the only outcome.
Hurley doesn't need to go down the trade path and could lodge at anytime. Efc have contacted all the invloved player managers and they stated they would use the traditional route of trading and not the dfa. That's ejat effort hopes and to be honest most players don't seem angry at the club to cause efc to gain nothing.
That doesn't mean they couldn't if they wanted too
Have a look at the HS article(Monday I think)by you're CEO where he is quoted that player managers have agreed verbally that they wouldn't take that path (dfa and tribunal).
That means the option is available but the players prefer to go through the traditional path.
The problem with this idea isn't that he couldn't apply for the process before the trade period (he could), but that why hasn't he then done so? Such an extreme move doesn't fit with any of the other information availabile that he has been negotiating around staying. That doesn't indicate a wrecked relationship. And the guy whose relationship did sour - Carlisle - didn't use this process. So do you have any reason to think this is at all probable, rather than merely a long shot possibility?Agreed it's a mess, if they went down that path he has to do more than sign a piece of paper...
I don't think anything but a trade will happen but what would happen in this scenario;
Hurley serves eft with a breach notice and request to be made a free agent. Now if essendon agree there is no need for a grievance tribunal.
Hurley/manager/new club get on the afl media circus and use the pressure to state that you have gone on record stating you won't stand in a players way to leave, I'm now asking you to honour that.
Does essendon reject the breach and make Hurley go through the process (which no one know what will happen) or do they honour their original commitment ??
but what club would want to hold back $800k and a list spot on the possibility they win the grievance process?Cheers, excellent precedent it seems.
I wonder if the AFL would allow an exemption pending the result of the tribunal case. They'd have to for him to be able to leave that way (assuming it happens after the trade period concludes).
The problem with this idea isn't that he couldn't apply for the process before the trade period (he could), but that why hasn't he then done so? Such an extreme move doesn't fit with any of the other information availabile that he has been negotiating around staying. That doesn't indicate a wrecked relationship. And the guy whose relationship did sour - Carlisle - didn't use this process. So do you have any reason to think this is at all probable, rather than merely a long shot possibility?
but what club would want to hold back $800k and a list spot on the possibility they win the grievance process?
Our original commitment always included the stipulation that we expect something in return for our contracted players and I have no idea where anybody gets any other ideas from.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/a...d/news-story/0bfbb270272e46336695d84615ef86fd
Essendon will help our players to move by accepting a reasonable offer, negotiating with any club of Hurley's choosing and if he's absolutely set on leaving, we'd likely do what we did with Carlisle and explore opportunities with other clubs if it assures that he could leave. If that isn't enough in terms of "not standing in their way", then I have no idea what else Essendon is supposed to do in this situation.
I really wonder how many more years of pain and torture Essendon supporters and post-2012 players should be subjected to before the torch and pitchfork brigade decides they've had enough of punishing a club for decisions made by a leadership group which has long left.
Yeah but the pain of losing two is still there. Every time something storm pops up on social media, scroll through the comments. Cheats, boats and vouchers normally get a mention and this is 6 years on.A whole two years until they won the premiership...
Sources say it depends on you removing the old noggin from the old bumhole, so it won't be any time soon unfortunately.Has he signed yet ????
You can quote me on this - there is zero chance Hurley will play at Collingwood.Pies now have entered the race. This would be a bad result for Ess and the pies won't have the draft picks to get it done. Hurley would be a good fit with their issues down back.
Another storm in a tea cup?You can quote me on this - there is zero chance Hurley will play at Collingwood.
85 pages of people knowing absolutely nothing.
Astonishing.
You could actually extend that to 99% of all threads created on bf
Nope, Rules state Clubs need to make one 1st round pick every 3 years.Can Collingwood offer next year's first?
If not I'd ask for Jaime Elliot and De Goey.
You think only 3 clubs have enquired about him?Pies now have entered the race. This would be a bad result for Ess and the pies won't have the draft picks to get it done. Hurley would be a good fit with their issues down back.
Hurley and Tarrant sounds good.Another storm in a tea cup?
Can Collingwood offer next year's first?
If not I'd ask for Jaime Elliot and De Goey.