NAB Challenge Discussion

[TheOz]

Wells 14 disposals at 100% at half time and has moved very well.

 

[Franky_024]

Good to see the AFL have cracked on to Hawks shepherding the man on the mark

 

[DraftPunk]

Josh Gibson tempting anyone?

 

[Here2tellyouwhy]

WOW

I could get that output from Mills

Here2tellyouwhy

Danger was in my side before Fyfe. His 91 was due to a DE% of 60 ala Clangerfield.

Adelaide really dodged a bullet with that one. It's losing Kerridge and his 80% DE that will hurt them.

 

[Here2tellyouwhy]

First we were seeing inflated scores in NAB 1 and 2.. now they look like 3 qtr time scores.

Champion Data stuffed up and left the Cyril filter on their stats calculator.

 

[Kadog]

What was Dangers TOG%?

 

[Here2tellyouwhy]

They still add up to 3300
Main issue is that 24 players on each team are dividing up that pie

That's it. 24 players fighting for a spot on the 22. No 1st gamers and reserve players to be ssen.

 

[Bont2Bruce]

What was Dangers TOG%?

73%

 

[Jiska]

Josh Gibson tempting anyone?

TheOz is a massive fan

 

[Bont2Bruce]

That's it. 24 players fighting for a spot on the 22. No 1st gamers and reserve players to be ssen.

Because of the sub rule, we've become used to seeing SC scores for 21 full players on each team. The 24 that are getting around in NAB3 is a big difference.

 

[TheOz]

Fantasy Freako ‏@FantasyFreako 4m4 minutes ago
% of centre bounces attended during #NABChallenge - Dangerfield 67% and Pendles 37%.

 

[Here2tellyouwhy]

Because of the sub rule, we've become used to seeing SC scores for 21 full players on each team. The 24 that are getting around in NAB3 is a big difference.

It will drag some players averages down. Plus the fact they will all play more fatigued due to the reduction in interchanges.

 

[TheOz]

Because of the sub rule, we've become used to seeing SC scores for 21 full players on each team. The 24 that are getting around in NAB3 is a big difference.

This is a great point and might mean that it's not worth overspending on too many of the ultra-premiums.

 

[Jiska]

This is a great point and might mean that it's not worth overspending on too many of the ultra-premiums.

Fyfe and Danger overpriced?

 

[TheOz]

Fantasy Freako ‏@FantasyFreako 1m1 minute ago
14 disposals and a 100% disposal efficiency for Wells. Also 6 clearances and 74 #SuperCoach points 6 minutes into 3rd term.

 

[KardiniaPark]

GEELONG

Cameron Guthrie 102
Patrick Dangerfield 91 (6 clangers)
Mark Blicavs 89
Harry Taylor 88
Steven Motlop 79
Zac Smith 77
Jordan Murdoch 75
Rhys Stanley 74
Cory Gregson 68
Josh Caddy 68
Tom Hawkins 64
Nathan Vardy 64
Andrew Mackie 63
Shane Kersten 63
Lincoln McCarthy 60
Tom Lonergan 53
Darcy Lang 52
Tom Ruggles 48
Lachie Henderson 47
Mitch Duncan 44
Jake Kolodjashnij 37
Josh Cowan 36
Nakia Cockatoo 32
Jimmy Bartel 22

FREMANTLE

Michael Barlow 117
David Mundy 115
Chris Mayne 108
Lachie Neale 99
Hayden Ballantyne 95
Danyle Pearce 93
Stephen Hill 90
Tendai Mzungu 90
Cameron Sutcliffe 89
Nat Fyfe 88
Garrick Ibbotson 88
Clancee Pearce 79
Matthew Pavlich 79
Zac Clarke 71
Michael Walters 70
Michael Johnson 67
Zac Dawson 65
Thommy Sheridan 57
Harley Bennell 56
Jonathon Griffin 54
Matth Taberner 44
Nick Suban 39
Lee Spurr 27
Lachie Weller 24

91? He ****ing dominated!

 

[TheOz]

Fyfe and Danger overpriced?

I dunno, possibly. imo you're overspending if you grab all four of Pendles, GAJ, Danger and Fyfe all from the start, the two in that list that would be underpriced are GAJ and Pendles.

 

[TheOz]

91? He ******* dominated!

Some pretty ordinary turnovers and was much less prominent in the second half which would have had most of the scaling.

 

[TheOz]

Fantasy Freako ‏@FantasyFreako 1m1 minute ago
8 HTA and 80 #SuperCoach points for Goldstein. Set for another huge year.

 

[Here2tellyouwhy]

This is a great point and might mean that it's not worth overspending on too many of the ultra-premiums.

Here's my attempt at maths.

3300 / 22 = 150 points per player
3300 / 21.25 = 155.3 points per player

So +5.3 points on offer per player with 22 on the park compared to 21 and the .25 of a quarter from the sub player.

My head hurts.

 

[Here2tellyouwhy]

91? He ******* dominated!

6 clangers going at 60% DE.

I too was surprised. Also had 15 contested and 8 clearances.

 

[Here2tellyouwhy]

Fantasy Freako ‏@FantasyFreako 1m1 minute ago
8 HTA and 80 #SuperCoach points for Goldstein. Set for another huge year.

 

[TheOz]

Here's my attempt at maths.

3300 / 22 = 150 points per player
3300 / 21.25 = 155.3 points per player

So +5.3 points on offer per player with 22 on the park compared to 21 and the .25 of a quarter from the sub player.

My head hurts.

I don't think it will have too much of an effect on the top players but they might lose a point or two. This round of the NAB has an extra two players which is probably making it look worse than what it is.

 

[TheOz]

View attachment 224376

$695k of pure SC studness!

 

[Kadog]

Fantasy Freako ‏@FantasyFreako 1m1 minute ago
14 disposals and a 100% disposal efficiency for Wells. Also 6 clearances and 74 #SuperCoach points 6 minutes into 3rd term.

He may very well end up a keeper.