Remove this Banner Ad

National Draft

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcuz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
well we picked bradley and stanton with #6 and #13
what do people think, i don't know much about these players.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Stanton:

pacy midfielder who was one of the AFL Draft Camps top performers

Bradley:

A 198cm running wingman/on-baller is Bradley's short term-potential with the prospect of him bulking up into holding down a key position in coming years if needs be.

With the Bombers dodgy ruck stocks, Bradley could become another backup ruck option if things go bad while being groomed into a potent attacking tall.

Played in West Perth's WAFL senior premiership in 2003 and won the Larke Medal for Best Player in the 2003 Australian Under 18 Championships.

From BomberBlitz.com
 
from EFC.com

Nash is a medium-sized defender / midfielder who has represented the South Australian under 18s for the past two seasons. Nash has good finishing skills and was a member of the Central Districts reserves' Premiership team last season.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

YEAH! Dyson at 44!

Overall a very good effort by Essendon. Bradley, Nash and Stanton were all rated as first round picks by Matt Burgan, and Dyson slipped which is great news. Good job boys!
 
wasted 6, what a ****en waste.

weev taken like 5 ruckmen in the last 2 years. ****en ****

tenace, fast/ball winner not good enough for essendon?

seeing we dont have either of them - hird
 
Originally posted by jivey
wasted 6, what a ****en waste.

weev taken like 5 ruckmen in the last 2 years. ****en ****

tenace, fast/ball winner not good enough for essendon?

seeing we dont have either of them

Rama, Reynolds and Winderlich should all be first team players in the coming years, with Walsh a chance too - of players already on the list.

Still would have liked Tenace, but we can hardly write off Bradley.
 
honestly........


hille, ses, laycock, cartledge, SOK, allan, bradley?


hrmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Originally posted by jivey
wasted 6, what a ****en waste.

weev taken like 5 ruckmen in the last 2 years. ****en ****


I don't think they took Bradley as a ruckman, I think they took him as a Fletcher replacement.

And consider that Laycock looks like a better CHF/CHB prospect than a ruckman to this point of time anyway.
 
Originally posted by jivey
honestly........


hille, ses, laycock, cartledge, SOK, allan, bradley?


hrmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

ses and SOK don't play for us anymore though, or are you planning to include Salmon, Barnes and Somerville as well?
 
as recent ruckemn smartass? if we wanted a FB why not go pettigrew, ever heard of a guy called sam hunt?
 
Bradley is no fletcher replacement. He doesnt have anywhere near fletchers pace which is what you need these days to play full back. He is a 6"6 midfielder who has queries over his kicking.....We picked him over tenace...f*ck me...sheeds has a height fetish and it has shone through with pick 6
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom