- Joined
- Oct 31, 2005
- Posts
- 1,764
- Reaction score
- 25
- AFL Club
- Geelong
In: Kelly, S.Johnson, Riccardi, Playfair
Out: Mooney
Out: Mooney
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
eliiiiza said:Thought Shannon Byrnes would be put in as he'd be able to run with the Bulldogs' pace... Instead Kelly and Steve are let in, when they haven't earned their spot! GRRRRR.
Ricketts said:In Riccardi, out Tenace.
Dasher39 said:Hopefully only Playfair comes in and the other 3 remain on the sidelines!
Kelly - Been OK in his VFL games, but didn't dominate like you would expect he would. Admittedly last week was played in atroscious conditions.
SJ - When the **** will Geelong learn. He was terrible last week. He was at his selfish best. Tried to play 'fancy' football when it was pouring rain and tried to pick the ball up one handed. Also had the ball once about 55m with Davenport running free to his right, instead of handpassing (which would have seen Davenport have a free run at goal) he tried to evade 2 players and got caught holding the ball. SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED WHILE HE CONTINUES TO PLAY THAT CRAP!!
Riccardi - It's unfortunate, because he is too good for VFL level, but I don't think Ricco should play in the AFL this year. Because, what is the point? It's not as if he is at his blistering best. He would be a pinch hitter in the AFL at best, and he has already said he will retire at the end of the year, so what is the benefit of playing him. He cannot reach 300 games anymore, and I would much rather the place be given to a younger player who can get a bit more experience (or some experience) to improve for the future. Would rather see Ryan Gamble be given an opportunity.
Playfair - Whilst he hasn't been in much form, he is the obvious replacement for Cam Mooney.
jess_555 said:I TOTALLY agree with you Eliiiiza! I REALLY thought Shannon was gonna get a game this week especially after being rested for half the VFL game last weekend.
eliiiiza said:Thought Shannon Byrnes would be put in as he'd be able to run with the Bulldogs' pace.
After last week's 19 possessions in half a game (and appalling conditions) and kicking a goal from the boundary with his wrong foot, and named in the best for the past times he's played in VFL, he's still not let in?
Instead Kelly and Steve are let in, when they haven't earned their spot!
GRRRRR.
chapmanmagic35 said:In fairness to Johnno, his form post-omission earlier this season was better in that regard. In fact, he was second guessing himself at times which lead to mistakes because he was thinking of passing it off (a few mistakes against the Eagles can be attributed to that).
Ricketts said:In Riccardi, out Tenace.
Oscarlett said:I'd take Ricco's 60-70 minutes over Tenace's 100 anytime.
thehoff said:You guys place looks ahead of value for the team.
He is still too inconsistent, his disposal is poor, decision making at times is nothing short of shocking.
Both Steve Johnson and James Kelly are a class above Byrnes at this point in time.
hahaha. In this case it's got nothing to do with Byrnesy's looks (I don't find him overly attractive hahaha) that I think he should have been included in the side this week. I genuinely thought Byrnesy deserved a spot after his resent performances in the VFL but looking at the extended interchange I must have been wrong.
I don't agree that SJ and Kel are a class above Byrnes. All 3 have issues with poor decision making, disposals and inconsistencies BUT I don't see the difference or "class" as you put it between these 3 players. I'm happy to just agree to disagree with you Hoff. 
darren forssman said:at preston city oval he was back at his crazy best, handpassing when he should have kicked it, kicked it when he should have handpassed. he didnt do anything to warrant an inclusion to senior ranks.
jess_555 said:I try not to put the whole looks thing ahead of the value for the team but I can see how you may have thought this was the case with my post. Well Hoff, to be honest I'm only really bias about Sladey thankyou very muchhahaha. In this case it's got nothing to do with Byrnesy's looks (I don't find him overly attractive hahaha) that I think he should have been included in the side this week. I genuinely thought Byrnesy deserved a spot after his resent performances in the VFL but looking at the extended interchange I must have been wrong.
I don't agree that SJ and Kel are a class above Byrnes. All 3 have issues with poor decision making, disposals and inconsistencies BUT I don't see the difference or "class" as you put it between these 3 players. I'm happy to just agree to disagree with you Hoff.
![]()


