thethinkingcat
Senior List
- Joined
- May 20, 2014
- Posts
- 259
- Reaction score
- 159
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Banned
- #1,176
Locally mate when he was playing for meltonthe injury playing for Melton or the one in the AFL?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: Adelaide v Geelong - Rd 13 - 7:00PM Thu
Squiggle tips Cats at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists » -- All Rd 13 Games
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 13
The Golden Ticket - Corporate tickets, functions, Open Air Boxes at the Adelaide Oval, ENGIE, Gabba, MCG, Marvel, Optus & People First Stadiums. Corporate Suites at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Locally mate when he was playing for meltonthe injury playing for Melton or the one in the AFL?
Locally mate when he was playing for melton
I know. It's also the exact same way as he did it at local level too. He has a history that is similar to Jonathon Brown. Doing all the couragous stuff and getting the most serious injuries.that's exactly how he broke his arm in the AFL.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
that would be a really good interview, jakovich was a bit of a unit on the footy field, i remember watching a game, melbourne vs west coast, when both Allen and Glen where playing, Allen kept giving it to Glen, a few decent sprays & tried to rough him up. glen didn't do much in return, but dominated the gameI don't want to hear David Neitz talk about Allen Jakovich, I want to hear Allen Jakovich talk about Allen Jakovich!
if I close my eyes its open mike with cookie monster
It's true. I love the man (see avatar) but he has an odd voice to say the least.
I remember being a kid and my Dad taking me to training (circa 2002). Was shocked when Neita called the boys together for a 'rev-up' for the weekend's game and he sounded like Kermit the Frog. Only difference was every other word was '****'
have not seen the interview but after looking at his stats its interesting that one of his worse seasons stats wise was the season they made the grand final.
Did he play with injuries that season? not at full forward? any explanation at all why its the case?
Jeff Farmer had a career-best year as Melbourne's main forward, Russell Robertson kicked 40-odd goals, Adem Yze and Stephen Powell both kicked 30-plus for the year, and David Schwarz played all 25 games as well, so the Dees simply had more avenues to goal that season than they did between 2002-2006 (where Neitz kicked 60+ goals in 4 out of 5 seasons). I don't seem to recall Neitz being an out-and-out Full Forward until the latter part of his career anyway. He spent more time at CHF as well as switching back on occassion prior to that.
Pretty much this. Once the Ox was out for the count we really didn't have another true KPF for...well, since ever, really. (Brad Miller and er, maybe Juice Newton would be closest).
Yeah at one stage our forward line might have read
HF: Lyon Ox Jakovich
F: Yze Neitz Farmer
if the planets had aligned
Didn't see the episode, but if that's what they stated they were flat out wrong. In fact I remember the bookies placing Melbourne at record odds! Geelong was coming off obviously the 2007 premiership but also defeated the runner-up again at AAMI Stadium in Round 1 and beat Essendon by 99 points in Round 2. Melbourne was on the bottom with a percentage of 36.8%. In fact, Melbourne getting within five goals was considered a 'win' for them that day.Neitz was meh. There was one part that didn't make sense; Sheahan said there was a game in round 3 2008 in Geelong that Melbourne was expected to win. WTF? Geelong was coming off a record winning grand final margin and was on top of the ladder. Melbourne had lost their first 2 games by 200 points and was on the bottom. Don't see how Melbourne was expected to win.
Cats to pay $34 Demons respect
Author: Carley Jellett
Date: 02/04/2008
Words: 344
Source: AGE
Publication: The Age
Section: Sport
Page: 2
AS GEELONG prepares to unveil its premiership flag on Sunday against the winless Melbourne, an Australian betting agency has made history offering unbackable odds of $1.01 for the Cats to win.
The Demons, who have been beaten by a combined total of 199 points in the first two rounds of the season, are out to $34 to knock off the premiers on their home turf by Sportsbet.com.au.
Not since 1996, when Fitzroy - in its last season - played West Coast, has a team had such long odds, but Geelong coach Mark Thompson said he expects the Demons to be competitive.
"I'm sure they won't be like that all year," he said. "They'll win a game soon."
Thompson said his players would pay the same amount of respect to the bottom-placed team as they would any other.
"Look at their line-up, they'll still play a strong line-up. Sure, they haven't played the most competitive football but you know that they'll come out of this cycle.
"If we don't give them as much respect as other teams . . . we're not that much better than Melbourne that we can afford to do that."
Thompson said he will keep the process leading into the match "as normal as possible" and does not believe his players will be distracted by the unveiling of the 2007 premiership flag in front of a packed Skilled Stadium crowd.
"For a couple of moments, we will enjoy . . . our performances of 2007, but as soon as we go back into the rooms, we'll be locked back into the game.
"I'm sure it will be a proud moment, (but) I think it is more for the fans."
The coach confirmed ruckman Brad Ottens will miss another week due to an ankle injury, but denied the longer-than-expected recovery is due to structural damage.
"No . . . just soft-tissue stuff," Thompson said. "He hasn't been getting any better. I'm sure he's not far away but it's all depending on how he feels. He hasn't even started running yet.
"He might play next week, it could be two weeks or three weeks. We don't really know."
What was the context of the question?Yeah it was a bizarre comment to say the least. Think Mikey might have got his games/dates mixed up there.