Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: Western Bulldogs v Adelaide - Rd 14 - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Dogs at 60% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists » -- All Rd 14 Games
At the very least, the perpetrator(s) should be charged with attempted murder.
More like involuntary manslaughter – they would have had every intention of starting to fire but never set out to take some ones life but should be locked away from society for a very long time.
If and when they're caught, I'd prefer the courts to err on the side of severity with them rather than leniency.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Worst part about it is that apparently a lot if not most of the firebugs turn out to be volunteer firefighters.
It seems to me that someone who has a "passion" for lighting fires, knowing that lives/property can be lost, should not be charged with involuntary anything. It is a deliberate act. Life in maximum security prison (and only then because the death penalty is not available).
the guy that lit the big ash wedesday one wasn't.
he was a roller skating instructor.
He taught me to skate!!!
I think he was released in about 95.
The Ash Wednesday fire wasn't lit by a firebug, it was lit by a fire spreading from the Heathfield dump, when an idiot decided to burn off on a total fire ban day. Not quite the same situation as pyromania.
The legal system does not provide that as an option, as you can only be charged with murder or attempted murder,
... It's a deliberate act that puts human lives in jeopardy, some what like the actions of terrorists. ...
I thought that too, but I heard on the radio yesterday that someone was charged with deliberately endangering human life.
As long as the penalties are severe, it seems to be an appropriate charge.

I got married in Mt Barker. How close did it get?I live in Mt Barker, I'd neuter the swine
The SA premier must read BF as apparently (going by the radio up here) he has been quoted as saying that firebugs should be treated like terrorists as what they are doing is no different to a terrorist act.
macca23 strikes again.![]()
![]()

The SA premier must read BF as apparently (going by the radio up here) he has been quoted as saying that firebugs should be treated like terrorists as what they are doing is no different to a terrorist act.
macca23 strikes again.![]()
![]()
Didn't you know that Macca23 is "Media" Mike Rann .![]()
![]()
![]()

The legal system does not provide that as an option, as you can only be charged with murder or attempted murder, if it can be proven that the perpetrator intended to kill people by their actions. This would almost be impossible to prove in this type of case.
I think it would be far more appropriate to amend the laws to 1) Allow for the freezing and removal of assets of the "firebug".
2) make an order of reparation in forcing the perpetrator to help reinstate what they damaged.
3) Tracking bracelets for a period of time after their release.
None of these steps will prevent firebugs, as pyromania is an illness, but at least this would provide some relief for those affected by the firebugs. Unfortunately death penalties or maximum security jails do not offer any compensation to the victims or allow any possibility of rehabilitation for the offender.
I got married in Mt Barker. How close did it get?