ottens or mcintosh

[atcocc]

i cant decide between the 2 as my second ruck.

both were down last year through injury so who do u guys think is the better option.

ottens can rest foward and kick a bag but mcintosh will lead the ruck at the roos

 

[Judd_Magic]

Ottens easy, no contest!

 

[Don Gibson]

I have the mac, but dont remember what the price difference was.

Ottens better if the price isnt too different.

 

[Carlton Kid]

Ottens. Since the first Fanplanner came out I haven't changed my starting rucks. Cox, Ottens.

 

[Yoda_]

here is one for you.

Tom Bellchambers from Essendon, or Todd Goldstein from the Kangaroos, bear in mind, my starting rucks are, Dena Cox, and Brad Ottens.

Thinking Goldstein, as they want Hale to play as a permanent forward, but then they have Petrie as a back up. Although Goldstein played some absolute rippers last year, and I think even the NM staff were quietly surprised how well he did. With Tom Bellchambers, alot of talk abouthim having a stellar pre season, and the games that Laycock has produced arent exactly something to write home about. and thinnking he may get games later in the year.

 

[Ex President]

A mate of mine who is a North member and follows their team line-up very closely reckons there is a good chance that Goldstein will be North's 1st ruck option with McIntosh as a back-up coming back from injury.

 

[rocklovelive]

I'm going Ottens.
No real option to take game time from him, and he had a very poor '08.

 

[bloods01]

There's a $66K difference between the two. Ottens can go forward and kick goals and that's why I've picked him.

 

[rocklovelive]

Looks at their '07 averages.
Ottens has a lot more of a chance to improve his scoring.

 

[Lotch]

Yeah I've gone with Ottens but so have many others

So Mcintosh could work out...

Just see Ottens playing better this year with a decent pre season and the ability to kick bags.