Owners

[Bojan KantKick]

No but it’s news if the Kingdom controls the fund more than was previously led to be believed. For the PL to ever believe the Kingdom has no controlling interest defies belief.

The PL don't care and never did.

 

[moomba]

No but it’s news if the Kingdom controls the fund more than was previously led to be believed. For the PL to ever believe the Kingdom has no controlling interest defies belief.

The Premier league never believed that.

 

[Zidane98]

FSG are leeches

FSG Reportedly Prepare Liverpool for Sale by Prioritising Debt Repayment

According to journalists with ties to the club, it appears Liverpool are being prepared to maximise Fenway Sports Group’s return if—or when—sold.

liverpooloffside.sbnation.com

Since this article was published they've stated publicly that they aren't selling up. If they are serious about competing I would expect the infrastructure debt be converted to equity or written off completely (they can easily afford it) freeing up significant amounts of club revenue for a big 2023 summer window that is desperately needed. It is untenable for them to stay on with a focus on repaying their infrastructure debts over squad investment.

 

[Zidane98]

This campaigner wants to spend as little as possible while maximising the capital return on his investment - using the Liverpool club name to increase equity for FSG's gain. The ultimate capitalist.

 

[Jatz]

This campaigner wants to spend as little as possible while maximising the capital return on his investment - using the Liverpool club name to increase equity for FSG's gain. The ultimate capitalist.

Which is utterly ironic considering the values that have been around Liverpool

 

[Zidane98]

Which is utterly ironic considering the values that have been around Liverpool

With FSG worth 10bn + now this campaigner could also simply write off 300m in infrastructure debt with relative ease and prioritise transfer spending instead. Unfortunately FSG are focusing on paying down these debts to FSG with club revenue now which is BS.

I'll have to dig it up but I read somewhere under FFP we could spend up to 400m easily and still be all good FFP wise.

 

[DBAH0]

 

[Bojan KantKick]

They will have somewhere to offload the £600m of shite they've bought recently.

 

[Zidane98]

They will have somewhere to offload the £600m of shite they've bought recently.

We would take Mudryk on loan to give him some confidence.

Thing is our entire squad's wage bill is around 20m euros per season so we could only afford about 1.5% of his wages lol.

 

[RPCB]

We would take Mudryk on loan to give him some confidence.

Thing is our entire squad's wage bill is around 20m euros per season so we could only afford about 1.5% of his wages lol.

Add another 0.

 

[moomba]

We would take Mudryk on loan to give him some confidence.

Thing is our entire squad's wage bill is around 20m euros per season so we could only afford about 1.5% of his wages lol.

£368m wage bill in your last set of accounts, how much do you pay the cleaning lady?

 

[Bojan KantKick]

£368m wage bill in your last set of accounts, how much do you pay the cleaning lady?

Think he's talking about the French club he supports that Chelsea want to buy.

 

[SM]

Very gross. Going to strain competition integrity.

 

[moomba]

Think he's talking about the French club he supports that Chelsea want to buy.

Ah, that makes a little more sense.

 

[moomba]

I read today that UEFA were looking to strengthen rather than loosen rules on multi club ownership.

I don't think it's that big an issue tbh. Multi club ownership has been around for ages and I don't think it's damaged the sport too much.

 

[RPCB]

Ah, that makes a little more sense.

That makes much more sense.

 

[chef]

Was mentioned at take over we're going down the multiclub path so this ismt surprising. We'll end up with 3 or 4 clubs.

 

[SM]

I read today that UEFA were looking to strengthen rather than loosen rules on multi club ownership.

I don't think it's that big an issue tbh. Multi club ownership has been around for ages and I don't think it's damaged the sport too much.

Probably because they don't normally compete in the same competitions.

 

[moomba]

Probably because they don't normally compete in the same competitions.

I think the RB teams have in Europe, but I don't see too many problems as more teams move towards the multi ownership.

 

[moomba]

Oh yes please

 

[RPCB]

Oh yes please

How about a global voting system for player sales. I reckon there would be a few that would make it to 100%.

 

[Art Vandelay_]

Very gross. Going to strain competition integrity.

When have Chelsea bothered about competition integrity…

But yeah **** UEFA.

 

[Magma]

Oh yes please

ronaldo ronaldo ronaldo

 

[jd2010]

I read today that UEFA were looking to strengthen rather than loosen rules on multi club ownership.

I don't think it's that big an issue tbh. Multi club ownership has been around for ages and I don't think it's damaged the sport too much.

ENIC had Sparta Prague, AEK Athens and Rangers when they first bought Spurs. Funnily enough Sparta and AEK went on record equalling trophy droughts under their ownership!

 

[Bojan KantKick]