Remove this Banner Ad

Palmer vs Mastern vs Rance vs Ebert

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Well we need Rance as a future chb!
Depends on whether Paddy moves into the ruck or stays at CHB. I would personally prefer it if he stayed there because Ryder at CHB and Gumbleton at CHF will look pretty good. But back on the topic even if the coaching staff have plans for Paddy to move back into the ruck I still don't think we should take Rance.

I honestly would be happy with either Palmer Mastern or Ebert. For different reasons, but I do think they all have the ability to make the step up and star in the Essendon midfield for the next 10 years. ;)
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Problem with Ebert and Palmer is, in future, there is possibility they will want out due to home sick

but thats only a possibilitie


i'd like to see Palmer taken then Mastern then possibly Rance then Ebert
 
I would rate

Masten > Palmer > Ebert

I rate Masten higher just because he is better with both sides of the foot compared to Palmer, Palmer is too one-sided (left sided), but they are both considerably better then Ebert, they also play for the same team, but the funny this is .. one goes off when the other comes on .. rarely we see Masten/Palmer playing at the same time (or light it up at the same time)
 
i have not seen any of them play, but from what you guys are saying i would go with masten. inside mid, which is what we need, quick and good disposal. ebert also sounds good, an all round midfielder like hodge im told.

in regards to rance. im desperate for this kid, but apparently isnt worthy of pick 6. i reckon we do our best to trade for a 10 - 14 pick and try get this guy. he would solve our fletcher replacement search.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

cotchin won't be around at pick #6. no way. Richmond likely at #2. they way the judd trade is looking, i think it will be

Kreuzer (Carl)
Cotchin (Rich)
Morton (WC)

as the top three.

after that, who the hell knows? realistically, Melbourne and Doggies need key position players, but whether Henderson/Rance etc are worthy of top 5, i'm not sure.

anyway, i'd be happy with any of masten/palmer/ebert. in some ways, i'd lean towards Ebert. good skils, vision, balance - and he's bottom age, so really is a year behind the others
 
I think west coast would take kreuzer and morton? richmond take __

where will cochin go though? he'll be a bargain at pick 6 rite?

While drafts can sometimes work out a bit weird in hindsight, you can be guaranteed that Cotchin will not be there at pick 6.

If Kruezer goes 1, he will most likely go 2
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

The chances are Masten will go top 5 so forget it...and most likely Ebert too.

Why is everyone carrying on like we will have a choice?

BTW, I hope I am wrong and we get one of them.

Also, what round is Cyril Rioli supposed to get drafted?
 
The chances are Masten will go top 5 so forget it...and most likely Ebert too.

Why is everyone carrying on like we will have a choice?

BTW, I hope I am wrong and we get one of them.

Also, what round is Cyril Rioli supposed to get drafted?

Chances are Masten WON'T go top 5 and Ebert is highly unlikely to go top 5 also.

A lot will depend on whether the Dees and Doggies draft for best player or required positions.

Rioli will most likely be first round
 
The chances are Masten will go top 5 so forget it...and most likely Ebert too.

Why is everyone carrying on like we will have a choice?

BTW, I hope I am wrong and we get one of them.

Also, what round is Cyril Rioli supposed to get drafted?

Ebert definitely won't go top 5.

My feeling is this would be how it goes.

1. Matthew Kruezer
2. Trent Cotchin
3. Cale Morton
4. Rhys Palmer/Chris Masten
5. Ben McEvoy
6. Chris Masten/Rhys Palmer
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom