Palmer vs Mastern vs Rance vs Ebert

[mathew ollaik]

Who should we pick with pick 6?

For me: Mastern>Palmer>Rance>Ebert

 

[boms]

Take out Rance.

Its out of Masten Ebert and Palmer

 

[mathew ollaik]

Take out Rance.

Its out of Masten Ebert and Palmer

Well we need Rance as a future chb!

 

[SM10]

Well we need Rance as a future chb!

Depends on whether Paddy moves into the ruck or stays at CHB. I would personally prefer it if he stayed there because Ryder at CHB and Gumbleton at CHF will look pretty good. But back on the topic even if the coaching staff have plans for Paddy to move back into the ruck I still don't think we should take Rance.

I honestly would be happy with either Palmer Mastern or Ebert. For different reasons, but I do think they all have the ability to make the step up and star in the Essendon midfield for the next 10 years.

 

[sikmoe]

Either Mastern or Ebert.

 

[dp3[WLD]]

Problem with Ebert and Palmer is, in future, there is possibility they will want out due to home sick

but thats only a possibilitie


i'd like to see Palmer taken then Mastern then possibly Rance then Ebert

 

[Bombers1234]

Masten is from WA aswell...btw no 'r' in Masten

 

[Duckworth]

Masten looks the goods for mine. Ball magnet inside mid. Palmer 2nd. Has a pretty good highlights real. Ebert next - is quite young as well. Rance 4th. I think the other 3 fill a more urgent need.

 

[apex]

I would rate

Masten > Palmer > Ebert

I rate Masten higher just because he is better with both sides of the foot compared to Palmer, Palmer is too one-sided (left sided), but they are both considerably better then Ebert, they also play for the same team, but the funny this is .. one goes off when the other comes on .. rarely we see Masten/Palmer playing at the same time (or light it up at the same time)

 

[fish_bowl]

i have not seen any of them play, but from what you guys are saying i would go with masten. inside mid, which is what we need, quick and good disposal. ebert also sounds good, an all round midfielder like hodge im told.

in regards to rance. im desperate for this kid, but apparently isnt worthy of pick 6. i reckon we do our best to trade for a 10 - 14 pick and try get this guy. he would solve our fletcher replacement search.

 

[Burzum]

Chris Masten > Rhys Palmer > Brad Ebert > Alex Rance

 

[LukeParkerno1]

Masten would suit our needs, if he is taken (which is possible if WCE get picks 1 and 3 for Judd), then I'd take Ebert

 

[AndyLesPaul]

Masten would suit our needs, if he is taken (which is possible if WCE get picks 1 and 3 for Judd), then I'd take Ebert

I think west coast would take kreuzer and morton? richmond take __

where will cochin go though? he'll be a bargain at pick 6 rite?

 

[saladin]

cotchin won't be around at pick #6. no way. Richmond likely at #2. they way the judd trade is looking, i think it will be

Kreuzer (Carl)
Cotchin (Rich)
Morton (WC)

as the top three.

after that, who the hell knows? realistically, Melbourne and Doggies need key position players, but whether Henderson/Rance etc are worthy of top 5, i'm not sure.

anyway, i'd be happy with any of masten/palmer/ebert. in some ways, i'd lean towards Ebert. good skils, vision, balance - and he's bottom age, so really is a year behind the others

 

[GoDons]

I didn't realise that so many people saw the Championships...

 

[Merv]

I think west coast would take kreuzer and morton? richmond take __

where will cochin go though? he'll be a bargain at pick 6 rite?

While drafts can sometimes work out a bit weird in hindsight, you can be guaranteed that Cotchin will not be there at pick 6.

If Kruezer goes 1, he will most likely go 2

 

[acursi08]

Masten for sure. We need a player of his stature.

http://video2.foxsports.com.au/video.php?cat=154&id=3348

This is a video interview with Chris. It also has a video of Ebert

 

[mathew ollaik]

Masten for sure. We need a player of his stature.

http://video2.foxsports.com.au/video.php?cat=154&id=3348

This is a video interview with Chris. It also has a video of Ebert

masten bloody looks good!

 

[MarkJohnson#1]

1. Masten
2. Palmer
3. Rance/Ebert

 

[monty1104]

Masten>Ebert>Rance>Palmer

 

[Bomber Bill]

The chances are Masten will go top 5 so forget it...and most likely Ebert too.

Why is everyone carrying on like we will have a choice?

BTW, I hope I am wrong and we get one of them.

Also, what round is Cyril Rioli supposed to get drafted?

 

[Merv]

The chances are Masten will go top 5 so forget it...and most likely Ebert too.

Why is everyone carrying on like we will have a choice?

BTW, I hope I am wrong and we get one of them.

Also, what round is Cyril Rioli supposed to get drafted?

Chances are Masten WON'T go top 5 and Ebert is highly unlikely to go top 5 also.

A lot will depend on whether the Dees and Doggies draft for best player or required positions.

Rioli will most likely be first round

 

[SM10]

Will the Doggies take Henderson??

 

[Burzum]

The chances are Masten will go top 5 so forget it...and most likely Ebert too.

Why is everyone carrying on like we will have a choice?

BTW, I hope I am wrong and we get one of them.

Also, what round is Cyril Rioli supposed to get drafted?

Ebert definitely won't go top 5.

My feeling is this would be how it goes.

1. Matthew Kruezer
2. Trent Cotchin
3. Cale Morton
4. Rhys Palmer/Chris Masten
5. Ben McEvoy
6. Chris Masten/Rhys Palmer

 

[apex]

Lachie Henderson looks to be a smokie, if the Eagles get pick 3, they might go for Henderson, dropping Masten/Morton/Palmer/Ebert down a notch, might be able to pick one of them up with ur pick.