Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
That about sums it up really. Danger is ahead right now, but Bont is looking like he could be at least as good and is a few years younger. Would love either at my clubGee.......a Brownlow medallist now in his prime, an absolute a-grader v a 20yo premiership player, already elite with plenty of improvement to come.
Right now think Dangerfield is in front but the Bont could surpass. I'd take the Bont who is 5 or 6 years younger. Both are awesome footballers.
Interesting point of view. I am sure someone that is good at extracting stats from the internet will dig up Danger's stats from when he was 20 years old.Bont for me due to Danger being much older, not sure the Bont will ever reach Dangers best though, if he does he'll need to keep improving at his current rate for the next few years.
And that proves what exactly?, or is there some kind of formula we can use that lets us know exactly how each individual 20 year old will progress through the years.Interesting point of view. I am sure someone that is good at extracting stats from the internet will dig up Danger's stats from when he was 20 years old.
Dogs will say bont cats will say danger
dumb poll.
One has 6 years development on the other.
That is not a relevant point because Kelly has never been as good as both, or in fact either.By that nature does that make James Kelly better then them both?