Patrick Dangerfield?

[Shaneprice97]

With our second best player requesting a trade for all the right reasons, we have a huge hole on our list, and Dekka and the crew have there hands full this trade period replacing that hole.

The club has said they demand a player of Patrick Dangerfields calibre if we do end up losing one of our favourites in Dayne Beams, which does look like happening. Which makes this trade period very interesting not having 2 players this good actually get traded since Chris Judd at the end of 07', when he was the games best player at the time.

Another interesting point of this arc is that Dangerfield had a strong relationship with Brenton Sanderson, at one point saying he would stay at Adelaide if Sando stays there(or something along those lines, don't quote me at all on that), Sanderson has since been sacked and should find another job easily. This isnt saying Dangerfield is leaving at all though.

On Sando, Buckley has said to be trying to find room for his Best Friend in the coaching department, which in my honest opinion is a great move as i always rated Sando as a coach.

Link on the Bucks/Sando coaching situation here: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/adelai...rson-says-nathan-buckley-20140920-10jt1o.html




That's right Ray, there is more.

Scott Pendlebury has been spotted having lunch with Patrick Dangerfield, take what you want out of that information.

Mods, merge if you wish.

 

[Seedsman_]

Scott Pendlebury has been spotted having lunch with Patrick Dangerfield, take what you want out of that information.

Where'd you get this from?

 

[Shaneprice97]

Where'd you get this from?

mattys123 was telling us on the Beams trade talk thread.

Trusty poster on the board,

if you could post the sources Mattys, that would be great!

 

[Chief Ten Beers]

Always rated this guy as a player. Perhaps a little inconsistent but he has massive potential. Fingers crossed that a bit of luck goes our way in 2014:

Freeman, Dangerfield, Pendles, Marley, Adams....sunglasses emoticon.

 

[Shaneprice97]

Always rated this guy as a player. Perhaps a little inconsistent but he has massive potential.

Midfield suddenly looking okay again:

Freeman, Dangerfield, Pendles, Marley, Adams....sunglasses emoticon

Out: Beams
In: Dangerfield

Makes 2015 look ridiculously better than 2015 if

Out: Beams
In: high Draft picks

Happens

 

[Lord Wilberforce]

I would take Dangerfield every day of the week. It would definitely restore some of my faith if we were to land him.

I rate him over Fyfe as the best youngish mids in the AFL.

 

[jimmy35]

↑
Scott Pendlebury has been spotted having lunch with Patrick Dangerfield, take what you want out of that information.



Haha oh how I'd love this to be true and come out. Heads would assplode.

 

[GoalSneak07]

Wow wee.. how desperate are we on here...

 

[BEEG]

Love it to happen but can just not see it

 

[Collingwood pro]

He is contracted and will take a lot to actually get him, similar to the cost of Beams.

 

[ThisIsJake]

I would take Dangerfield every day of the week. It would definitely restore some of my faith if we were to land him.

I rate him over Fyfe as the best youngish mids in the AFL.

100% agree, not many people do.

 

[mattys123]

mattys123 was telling us on the Beams trade talk thread.

Trusty poster on the board,

if you could post the sources Mattys, that would be great!

Here we go;

@swess16: BREAKING: walked out of @deadmanbarista as Pendlebury & Dangerfield walked in. Had their game faces on & dressed incognito. #afl #sidebyside

@jcpie77: Having lunch at @deadmanbarista and guess who is in here - NO JOKE...
Pendlebury and Dangerfield.... together.

2 sources is better than one.

 

[ThisIsJake]

By all reports Danger was one of the big reasons for Sando getting the sack, even if it was in the best interests of the club it surely would strain the relationship.

 

[Seedsman_]

mattys123 was telling us on the Beams trade talk thread.

Trusty poster on the board,

if you could post the sources Mattys, that would be great!

Interesting. I remember watching an episode of The Grill and when asked who his favourite player was when growing up as a kid, Danger replied with Bucks iirc. Hope this eventuates because I'm spewing about Beamer.

 

[wicksy]

He is contracted and will take a lot to actually get him, similar to the cost of Beams.

Are you sure? I thought he was an RFA this year?

 

[Dead Eye Didak]

I got a feeling something is brewing here!!!

 

[eddiebankbalance]

Are you sure? I thought he was an RFA this year?

Next year.

 

[wicksy]

I got a feeling something is brewing here!!!

I've got a big fart brewing....

 

[domin8tors]

one of the reasons rumoured that Sando got sacked is that he believed that they are still in premiership contention however the club thinks not, which is why they are " somewhat happy " to get picks in for Dangerfield whilst they can.

It's Beams => Brisbane => 2 highest picks => Adelaide => Dangerfield => Collingwood

 

[Collingwood pro]

Are you sure? I thought he was an RFA this year?

Next year I'm pretty sure. He's one year older than Beams.

 

[wicksy]

Next year I'm pretty sure. He's one year older than Beams.

And when is he uncontracted?

 

[RedmanWasHere]

Next year I'm pretty sure. He's one year older than Beams.

Both born in 1990.

 

[Collingwood pro]

And when is he uncontracted?

Not sure I thought he was still contracted for next year though.

 

[Shaneprice97]

Next year I'm pretty sure. He's one year older than Beams.

Hes actually just under a month younger than Beams.

Danger was just picked up the draft earlier as a bottom ager.

Trent Cotchin is the same.

 

[Collingwood pro]

Both born in 1990.

Thanks got that wrong. Beams is older than Danger though which is surprising.