Percentage under 60

[Southerntakeover]

To everyone whos questioning just how bad we are, or have been, the proofs in the pudding.

59%.


The amazing thing really is that theres been a team worse than this almost historically bad performance.

 

[CaptainDangerfield]

Amazingly, in the top 70 tacklers in the competition we have only 1 player, Thomson at 49. Next weeks opponent, Port Power, has 7 players in the top 70. Richmond has 3. Our new premier tagger, Brent Reilly, isn't in the top 100.

 

[RoosterLad]

Those are some depressing statistics.

 

[SydCrow]

and this week we kicked a higher score than WCE, St Kilda, the MyATMs, Geelong, Essendon, Hawthorn and Brisbane (and 1 point less than Richmond)

boy must they be going bad

 

[Crow-mo]

and this week we kicked a higher score than WCE, St Kilda, the MyATMs, Geelong, Essendon, Hawthorn and Brisbane (and 1 point less than Richmond)

boy must they be going bad

how many of them have a better %

 

[CaptainDangerfield]

Those are some depressing statistics.

Makes a mockery of Craigies claim that Reilly is doing a good job. For a tagger not to be in the top 30 is astounding, but not in the top 100.

 

[Tas]

Amazingly, in the top 70 tacklers in the competition we have only 1 player, Thomson at 49. Next weeks opponent, Port Power, has 7 players in the top 70. Richmond has 3. Our new premier tagger, Brent Reilly, isn't in the top 100.

That isn't great. But 23 tackles gets you ranked into the 30s while 20 tackles gets you into the 60-70 range and you have Reilly on 19, Petrenki and Goodwin on 18 and Edwards on 17. Porps is also on 16 and has played 1 less game. I don't think the ratings are overly meaningful after 5 rounds, the few at the top are a long way ahead of most players though.

I think we are ranked 6th for tackles but only have one extra player with 10 or more tackles, we just have a few more that are tackling fairly heavily, Swallow leads the comp with 47 and we have Ziebell on 30, also helped that our #2 ruckman is pretty good when the ball is at ground level, he has 20 tackles.

Still early days though, a few good games can make a dramatic change in tackle position, we racked up 93 tackles on the weekend, am sure that boosted a fair few players up the rankings this week.

 

[CaptainDangerfield]

That isn't great. But 23 tackles gets you ranked into the 30s while 20 tackles gets you into the 60-70 range and you have Reilly on 19, Petrenki and Goodwin on 18 and Edwards on 17. Porps is also on 16 and has played 1 less game. I don't think the ratings are overly meaningful after 5 rounds, the few at the top are a long way ahead of most players though.

I think we are ranked 6th for tackles but only have one extra player with 10 or more tackles, we just have a few more that are tackling fairly heavily, Swallow leads the comp with 47 and we have Ziebell on 30, also helped that our #2 ruckman is pretty good when the ball is at ground level, he has 20 tackles.

Still early days though, a few good games can make a dramatic change in tackle position, we racked up 93 tackles on the weekend, am sure that boosted a fair few players up the rankings this week.

Average tackles per game, we rank 16th.

 

[SugarShane]

We've also got the lowest 'points for' out of everyone, including Richmond. There's some bragging rights.