Remove this Banner Ad

peter singer at it again

  • Thread starter Thread starter agitator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

agitator

All Australian
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Posts
786
Reaction score
1
Other Teams
salisbury serial killers
is this guy for real, does he just say outrageous things to get free publicity and help his book sales??

now he recons it's ok to shag dead people or to bonk animals.

i've always had a fantasy about shagging joan of arc, i think she'ld be a real goer. as for animals i'm not so sure, sheep are so yesterday, it just doesn't excite me anymore grabbing hold of a sheep's woolly hind quarters. it's time to experiment with more exoctic animals.

what animals do you dream of having sex with??
 
If yout talking about his article about bestiality its a fairly old article and if you actually read it and understand it, it has more to do with ethical treatment of animals than beastiality, the beastiality is only used as shock value.
 
agitator said:
is this guy for real, does he just say outrageous things to get free publicity and help his book sales??

now he recons it's ok to shag dead people or to bonk animals.

i've always had a fantasy about shagging joan of arc, i think she'ld be a real goer. as for animals i'm not so sure, sheep are so yesterday, it just doesn't excite me anymore grabbing hold of a sheep's woolly hind quarters. it's time to experiment with more exoctic animals.

what animals do you dream of having sex with??
Are you nuts?.Singer hasnt said that at all,why do the Right misconstrue everything Singer says.Andrew Bolt has been misquoting people again and of course been corrected,but i'm sure he'll say he is 'taken out of context'.
 
Bombers 2003 said:
Are you nuts?.Singer hasnt said that at all,why do the Right misconstrue everything Singer says.

Possibly for the same reasons that Michael Moore twists the views of the Right around?

It's an attention span thing. People are more easily convinced by pandering to their prejudices and simplifying things into neat catchphrases.

Bombers 2003 said:
Andrew Bolt has been misquoting people again and of course been corrected,but i'm sure he'll say he is 'taken out of context'.

It's always interesting to see how the opponents of Singer can take one of his essays (which usually take well over an hour to read and absorb) and boil it down to one sentence.

I don't agree with everything that Singer says, but if you want to make up your mind, people should read his articles and then judge the value of his point of view. But then again, that would take over an hour, and it's much easier to read the Hun.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom