Remove this Banner Ad

Players TOG Stats

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Daz

Daz

Norm Smith Medallist
Veteran
Jan 9, 2008
9,694
4,013
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Just going through this weeks TOG stats these were the ones that I found interesting.

L.Ball - 70% (29 touches)
N. Malceski - 65%
C. Bird - 61%
R.Palmer - 71%
G. Ibbotson - 87%
B. Johnson - 77% (injured)
J. Morton - 87%
J. Corey - 86%
G. Ablett - 87%
J. Bartel - 86% (hopeully means he is not carrying an injury)
C.Judd - 80% (less than the other blues mids)
B. Wilkes - 87%
W. Schoefield - 59%
S. Wellingham - 81%
D. Swan - 77%
B. Vince - 58%
D. Myers - 60% (82 points)

If anyone who doesn't have access to these stats would like to know them just post the players names and I will get them for you. Hopefully others who have access to the stats can help out as well.
 
rOdGe said:
Does that mean Ablett and Corey are too. I think is just means there midfield is so strong they can afford to rest there superstars more than other clubs. How good is Dane Swan to play 77% and score the way he does. Wish i had him.
Click to expand...

The point is that they are normal midfield numbers. They aren't really being rested. It's a good thing to see though because I was worried about Bartel.
 
Yeah i didn't read right before sorry mate lol. Thats why i deleted that part haha.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

dazza wyatt said:
Just going through this weeks TOG stats these were the ones that I found interesting.

L.Ball - 70% (29 touches)
N. Malceski - 65%
C. Bird - 61%
R.Palmer - 71%
G. Ibbotson - 87%
B. Johnson - 77% (injured)
J. Morton - 87%
J. Corey - 86%
G. Ablett - 87%
J. Bartel - 86% (hopeully means he is not carrying an injury)
C.Judd - 80% (less than the other blues mids)
B. Wilkes - 87%
W. Schoefield - 59%
S. Wellingham - 81%
D. Swan - 77%
B. Vince - 58%
D. Myers - 60% (82 points)

If anyone who doesn't have access to these stats would like to know them just post the players names and I will get them for you. Hopefully others who have access to the stats can help out as well.
Click to expand...

wat was scotty thompsons TOG?
 
Cale for Captain said:
you could argue the point that less game time means more impact whilst you're on the ground, so these stats are really quite useless.:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

You could. Or you could not post garbage. What happens if the Collingwood midfield all gets injured and Swan has to step up and play on the ground more. People also like to know how much time their rookies are getting on the field. For example I was a little disappointed at the time Myers had on the field. Then I saw the bright side that if he is given more opportunity then he could score quite well. It is also interesting that Ibbotson is getting 16% more game time than Palmer.
 
dazza wyatt said:
You could. Or you could not post garbage. What happens if the Collingwood midfield all gets injured and Swan has to step up and play on the ground more. People also like to know how much time their rookies are getting on the field. For example I was a little disappointed at the time Myers had on the field. Then I saw the bright side that if he is given more opportunity then he could score quite well. It is also interesting that Ibbotson is getting 16% more game time than Palmer.
Click to expand...

I think TOG can provide some useful insights into players being "managed" etc but needs to be taken in the context of their normal TOG. The Geelong numbers here are useful for those worried about Bartell as the load was shared evenly amongst the big 3 in a thumping of Carlton. Any injury worries and he would have been on the bench for sure.

Mainly useful for trends as opposed to normal averages. Swan has always been a burst player, plays best that way and is the most rotated player at the Pies. It's interesting that when his TOG increased by 11 mins per match (86 to 97 mins) from 2006 to 2007 his scoring average remained unchanged.
 
dazza wyatt said:
You could. Or you could not post garbage. What happens if the Collingwood midfield all gets injured and Swan has to step up and play on the ground more. People also like to know how much time their rookies are getting on the field. For example I was a little disappointed at the time Myers had on the field. Then I saw the bright side that if he is given more opportunity then he could score quite well. It is also interesting that Ibbotson is getting 16% more game time than Palmer.[/quote]

They each play a competely different role.
Click to expand...
 
54Dogs said:
I think TOG can provide some useful insights into players being "managed" etc but needs to be taken in the context of their normal TOG. The Geelong numbers here are useful for those worried about Bartell as the load was shared evenly amongst the big 3 in a thumping of Carlton. Any injury worries and he would have been on the bench for sure.

Mainly useful for trends as opposed to normal averages. Swan has always been a burst player, plays best that way and is the most rotated player at the Pies. It's interesting that when his TOG increased by 11 mins per match (86 to 97 mins) from 2006 to 2007 his scoring average remained unchanged.
Click to expand...
I went up by 4 points.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

dazza wyatt said:
You could. Or you could not post garbage. What happens if the Collingwood midfield all gets injured and Swan has to step up and play on the ground more. People also like to know how much time their rookies are getting on the field. For example I was a little disappointed at the time Myers had on the field. Then I saw the bright side that if he is given more opportunity then he could score quite well. It is also interesting that Ibbotson is getting 16% more game time than Palmer.
Click to expand...

Ibbotson's TOG was 16% greater than Palmer's this round only, and this has been the greatest differential between the two this season.

Over the season, Palmer's nine games have averaged 76.4% TOG, whereas Ibbo has averaged 82.3% TOG across his seven games - a differential closer to 6% than 16%.

Bold.
 
Jan Juc said:
Ibbotson's TOG was 16% greater than Palmer's this round only, and this has been the greatest differential between the two this season.

Over the season, Palmer's nine games have averaged 76.4% TOG, whereas Ibbo has averaged 82.3% TOG across his seven games - a differential closer to 6% than 16%.

Bold.
Click to expand...


Harvey has made it clear that both players will be "managed" through the back half of the season so expect less TOG, possibly even rested for a week or 2. Ibbo is an '05 draft pick so can probably handle the workload a bit more.
 
Jan Juc said:
Ibbotson's TOG was 16% greater than Palmer's this round only, and this has been the greatest differential between the two this season.

Over the season, Palmer's nine games have averaged 76.4% TOG, whereas Ibbo has averaged 82.3% TOG across his seven games - a differential closer to 6% than 16%.

Bold.
Click to expand...

Fair enough, still an interesting stat.
 
Originally Posted by 54Dogs
I think TOG can provide some useful insights into players being "managed" etc but needs to be taken in the context of their normal TOG. The Geelong numbers here are useful for those worried about Bartell as the load was shared evenly amongst the big 3 in a thumping of Carlton. Any injury worries and he would have been on the bench for sure.

Mainly useful for trends as opposed to normal averages. Swan has always been a burst player, plays best that way and is the most rotated player at the Pies. It's interesting that when his TOG increased by 11 mins per match (86 to 97 mins) from 2006 to 2007 his scoring average remained unchanged.

Jimhouse said:
I went up by 4 points.
Click to expand...

Talk me through that Jim. I have an AFL prospectus here telling me that he has averaged 102 for the last 2 seasons. Did I get a misprint?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Players TOG Stats

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top