b0ydman Jr
All Australian
- Jul 8, 2023
- 922
- 1,263
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Hudson, Dunstall, Whateley & BT (Radio versions)I’m struggling to think of any that aren’t rubbish these days.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Hudson, Dunstall, Whateley & BT (Radio versions)I’m struggling to think of any that aren’t rubbish these days.
The first three, yes, BT not so muchHudson, Dunstall, Whateley & BT (Radio versions)

“ What would Ken Hinkley do?”Kingsley at ht must of asked himself what would be the opposite of a ken hinkley talk be
Toby Greene type though, not current Hawthorn ‘Wiz’ type.Kunty footballers are the best. Back in the 80s and 90s we had plenty. Even in the 2000s. Josh Carr was a Kunty footballer.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
GWS in Sydney too apparentlyBrisbane at the GABBA and Geelong at home will be tough for them to win.
Aahh.
Ford what Academy players on the GWS list bother you?You know what they need? An Academy with unrestricted access. That would help them along.
Ford what Academy players on the GWS list bother you?
Also what father son products have assisted them win zero premierships?
People gripe about Collingwood landing N Daicos as a cheap F/S but they gave up the draft pick GWS used to land Callaghan to acquire the draft capital to land him.Callaghan’s quarter was phenomenal. He is an unbelievable player.
Won’t Port land Cochrane through an academy? Burgoyne and Mead are F/S. Salopek, Rodan, Francou, Burgoyne in the pipeline. GWS has no ability to attract players like JHF and NWM. It has to pick over the outcasts of the league like Hogan and Stringer. I could understand resenting Sydney and Brisbane having leg-ups given they are well established and long time successful clubs but not the Giants who have done very well in drafting recruiting and retaining talent, and that should not be held against them.The concept bothers me across the four northern states. We scratch and claw for any assistance and the players are just handed to those clubs.
I could ask you the same question about Port Adelaide.
Himmelberg, Briggs, Tom Green….Ford what Academy players on the GWS list bother you?
Also what father son products have assisted them win zero premierships?
I like him on radio, he's much better than on tvThe first three, yes, BT not so much![]()
I’m sure how you can see how it would be a bit of a travesty for Canberra-born Tom Green to not get the opportunity to be a pioneer at the Giants. It’s also where he wants to play his footy. There is a stand named (informally) after him at Manuka Oval.Himmelberg, Briggs, Tom Green….
I would be more annoyed with Heeney, Mills, Blakey, Wicks, Goulden and Campbell.
Won’t Port land Cochrane through an academy? Burgoyne and Mead are F/S. Salopek, Rodan, Francou, Burgoyne in the pipeline. GWS has no ability to attract players like JHF and NWM. It has to pick over the outcasts of the league like Hogan and Stringer. I could understand resenting Sydney and Brisbane having leg-ups given they are well established and long time successful clubs but not the Giants who have done very well in drafting recruiting and retaining talent, and that should not be held against them.
There are bigger issues to get your knickers in a knot about.How many premierships have Mead and Burgoyne won Port? Will Mead even be on a list next year?
Would you trade Tom Green for those two?
Cochrane, Salopek and Rodan, sure would be great to get them, but you know the saying about counting chickens, right? And who do GWS have in the pipeline? As a proud GWS supporter you should know the potential players coming through.
GWS haven't benefited specifically well from their Academy but as I said it is the concept I don't like and who knows when a clutch of players might fall to them. Either give all clubs the same rules or get rid of all Academies and stop corrupting the draft. But then the AFL would find another way to favour its golden clubs.
To y Greene type though, not current Hawthorn ‘Wiz’ type.
No current season stats available
I don’t disagree with academies. And in general, old-school Port supporters should thank Port’s success in the SANFL from the development of talent from its old recruitment zone.I’m sure how you can see how it would be a bit of a travesty for Canberra-born Tom Green to not get the opportunity to be a pioneer at the Giants. It’s also where he wants to play his footy. There is a stand named (informally) after him at Manuka Oval.
I agree the Swans academy is problematic and I also believe there are more registered Australian rules footballers in QLD than SA so the pool of players that the Suns and Lions can draw on is actually larger than for the SA clubs.
I like the concept of Academies but I believe all clubs should have access to them in as fair distribution as possible.
There are bigger issues to get your knickers in a knot about.
The biggest being the grand final being played on the home ground of four Victorian clubs.
The second being biased umpiring and fixturing that favours Victorian clubs.
Academies for expansion clubs that are too young to have any F/S prospects is a non issue but I don’t disagree that ideally all clubs have equal access to Academy talent.
Setting a great example with the personal attacks and wild spin.My knickers are hardly in a knot, I'm just pointing out an major inequality in a draft system that is meant to equalise.
Let's be serious, you ditched the club you claim to barrack for because they hurt your feelings somehow to bandwagon on a club that is going well. It's a bit hard to take your concern for GWS all that seriously. In a month you might be back barracking for Port or maybe have moved on to the Lions. Who knows?
Biased umpiring? When we played GWS, the free kick count favoured GWS 29-16 in a game we won by 20 points. Seems to me Port get it in the butt whoever we play. It's easy to say it favours Victorian clubs but do you have the stats to support that claim? The Suns and Lions are doing well this year, Port are getting slaughtered.
Yes the fixturing is a farce that favours Victorian clubs, but we weren't talking about Victorian clubs or umpiring or fixturing. You were the one who got their knickers in a knot about a throwaway line concerning Academies connected to a club you don't even really support. Or maybe you do? Nobody knows for sure. That was the topic of discussion and now you've deflected away to broader issues.
As far as father-son goes, when Port (and the crows for that matter) came into the comp they gained no benefit from father-son at all and had no Academies. Port had one father-son from the sanfl rules and that was due to an aadministrative oversight. The crows were gifted one in Michalanney that is highly dubious as a square up.
Setting a great example with the personal attacks and wild spin.
Port and Crows had a huge head start on Suns and Giants. This is reflected in results and it isn’t a coincidence those concessions led to the crows success in 97/98 and Ports sucess throughout the early 2000s.
You can cry foul but the fact is the administration of the PAFC is the biggest issue limiting its own success, not the odd player that still must be bid for through use of draft picks by expansion clubs with zero premierships and one grand final appearance between them.
Gaslighting no one. Suns and Giants might have had better draft concessions on paper, but they didn’t have the benefit of raiding a local state league or hiding players away. History shows the concessions didn’t lead to any success whereas they did for Crows and Port.There's no personal attack, you are just gaslighting. You did ditch the club you claimed to support to follow some other entity for whatever reason. Isn't that true? Is it not a fact?
And you keep mounting strawman arguments about other issues that I never broached. Did I ever say anything about Port's administration? Have I defended them in this discussion? You've just introduced them apropos of nothing.
I'm perfectly entitled to make a comment about a particular football issue without you trying link it to wild spin offs to use your terminology. Maybe I should justify peace in the Middle East next?
And surely you are not saying the Giants didn't have start up concessions. They've benefited through them for generations, because even when the Vic clubs poached those players, they would get multiple first round picks in return.
Port Adelaide had the worst start up concessions of any club to join the AFL.