I'm confused. Ox is it just you coming to breakfast or JohnF as well.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
What's the official bigfooty quota of posts required before I can be a smart ass??rfctigerarmy said:Well you are trying to be a bit of a smart ass for a new ********.
No I'm not Oxx. Now that we have that officially put to bed let's keep on truckin'!sante said:no im not i was just hoping you are not Oxx
tiga13 said:No I'm not Oxx. Now that we have that officially put to bed let's keep on truckin'!
![]()
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Ditto!mellowyellow said:FFS.
Bring on the football season!!
julzqld said:I'm confused. Ox is it just you coming to breakfast or JohnF as well.
Schnipper said:im sure he used to be a member here. as i remember he was all of 14 or 15 i think. thats right he said matty knights was a waste of time cos he watched some old videos of him. never went to a live game to watch him. ********er.....
Gustiger12 said:Your right Schnipper, he was banned and now he revel in the notoriety of being a banned PRE'ender.
There is a post he started somewhere asking if others wanted him banned. Makes a good read and you will sure as hell understand why he was banned.
CarnTheTiges said:Hammer was 17, his posts tended to show that in their immaturity. The rubbish he has posted at BF have only proved how immature he is and that PRE did the right thing in banning him.
PRE Guidelines said:Messages shouldn’t threaten or humiliate any other person or contain personal insults.
Any breech of the above will be followed with a single warning via email or PM from the administrators of PRE and the removal of the offending post. Subsequent breeches could result in a ban from PRE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mellowyellow
FFS.
Bring on the football season!!
Ditto!
I've been away a couple of weeks and come back to see everyone at each others throats in every second thread. Where's the love???
Quite amusing after reading the thread yesterday where they believe they influence the decisions the club makes.Punt_Road_Roar said:Well if the rumour is true that has recently been posted on the mainboards, it maybe a belated Christmas present for many of us so called forsaken people.
LOL
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showthread.php?t=149897
A rumour heard today from an insider and then touched upon by an SEN panellist.
A coterie group of the Richmond FC is exploring possibilities on what action, if any, it can take against the 'unofficial' Tigers website "puntroadend".
droppuntkick23 said:Its amazing how this minority group of probably 30 active posters including alias thinks this way.
Remember that we will have over 27,000 members this year![]()
They wanted to ""stone to death Corn Chips "" in some of there posts.
Its very interesting there change of tact, probably because the ""cold shoulder"" might be coming.
I cant imagine Clayton showing his head for a while![]()
kretchy said:Quite amusing after reading the thread yesterday where they believe they influence the decisions the club makes.![]()
Hammerfire said:It is fact that the moderation of posts, and banning of posters who were heavily biased against the Macek party during the election campaign was a serious problem.
It is well known that at least half a dozen, if not more posters who were Pro-Casey/Anti-Macek+Schwab were banned during the 2 weeks leading up to the election, some of these regular posters.
It would not suprise me if a case of defamation is brought against PRE, as some of the comments made concerning Casey, Miller and other board members were a disgrace, and utterly pathetic.
What was worse was the moderation, or lack thereof, of these posts.
The last thing Richmond needs is a No.1 (Supposed) "Unofficial" supporters site which is biasedly run, and does nothing but divide the supporter base which view these sites, which runs into the THOUSANDS.
Fishfinger said:Unless that coterie group sees itself as having been defamed on that site.
It's a rumour so may likely have no substance. A coterie group was definitely falsely demeaned on there though.