GotTheGoodes
Bloods
- Staff
- #4,151
It was my understanding that traditionally gender has been used as an added layer of identity verification & differentiation.
E.g. two people are getting married & traditionally it had to be between a man & woman. So this data would be required to easily differentiate between the two for the purposes of satisfying the previous legal requirements for marriage. Being included on the system would have made the process easier etc.
Differentiation isn't as required today as it was previously as legislation & social acceptance finally starts to modernise & catch up. Further, the traditional image of "male"/"female" no longer is so easy to differentiate in any event. So while you may asthetically be seen as one gender you may in fact legally be the other. The argument for including gender on s birth certificate is thus outdated IMO.
The costing to implement this would be what I'd be most keen to see though.
E.g. two people are getting married & traditionally it had to be between a man & woman. So this data would be required to easily differentiate between the two for the purposes of satisfying the previous legal requirements for marriage. Being included on the system would have made the process easier etc.
Differentiation isn't as required today as it was previously as legislation & social acceptance finally starts to modernise & catch up. Further, the traditional image of "male"/"female" no longer is so easy to differentiate in any event. So while you may asthetically be seen as one gender you may in fact legally be the other. The argument for including gender on s birth certificate is thus outdated IMO.
The costing to implement this would be what I'd be most keen to see though.




