Remove this Banner Ad

Religion Red Frogs Crew

  • Thread starter Thread starter Caesar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Caesar

Ex-Huckleberry
Joined
Mar 3, 2005
Posts
29,494
Reaction score
15,778
Location
Tombstone, AZ
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
I realise there is often a lot of negativity on this board about religion, and I often participate in it because the matters that come up for discussion are inevitably the bad things. And that's not necessarily a criticism - the bad things should be identified and discussed and opposed.

But I wanted to share with you a religious initiative that I really, really like - and one that I think should be a model for other religious outreach in our society. The Red Frogs Crew:

www.redfrogs.com.au

It's an initiative founded by a guy called Andy Gourley who is a new-agey sort of Christian and was bothered by the excessive drinking and dangerous behaviour at Schoolies Week on the Gold Coast. One night he bought a whole stack of Red Frogs with his mates and went wandering around the Gold Coast haunts and handing them out and making sure people were okay.

Since then it's grown into an international phenomenon - he gets a huge amount of sponsorship from various organisations (it must be noted that most of them have Christian ties) and now involves huge numbers of volunteers. At the behest of event organisers they set up hydration stations with free drinks and food at events involving alcohol. They help organise coffee crawls to be run as an alternative to pub crawls by university colleges, to ensure non drinking students don't get left out. And they wander around handing out the eponymous red frogs.

Now I'll admit that this whole thing is something that naturally makes me highly skeptical. Huge amounts of manpower and expense goes into this organisation - where's the quid pro quo? But at the time there were three very important things that impressed me about the approach (I am not sure if they still hold true several years later):

1) They never involved themselves with anything to do with the secular government education of children
2) There was no religious branding on anything used at an event to indicate that it was a religious organisation
3) Volunteers were expressly forbidden from mentioning their religiosity or that of the organisation unless specifically asked

The upshot is that most people at the event never even knew they were a religious group.

I mean sure, I wasn't born yesterday. There's obviously and ultimately a degree of 'conversion by example' going on here. It's a patently religious organisation - their official name is, after all, "Red Frogs Chaplaincy". They do good things, people find out they're Christian, Christianity gets good press.

But fundamentally, I have no problem with conversion by example as long as it doesn't intrude into certain areas (e.g. schools). And the restrictions imposed by the organisations on itself were in order to enable it to most effectively achieve its main purpose - to improve safety and conditions at events involving alcohol and young people, with religion not being an issue.

Now I'm sure there are people who will still have reservations in a religious organisation being involved like this. But for me, this is an excellent example for how a Christian organisation can fulfil its own mission of outreach and serving community welfare, and cater to people of all philosophies without specifically making religion an issue.

Anyone else have any thoughts or experiences, either on the organisation in question or religious outreach generally? I realise it's a sensitive issue but I think it is an interesting one.




*Disclaimer: I do know Andy Gourley personally (or used to), and have dealt with his organisation on a number of occassions. I met him when organising social events whilst living on campus at a university college. I swear I'm not getting paid for this thread. :p
 
*shrug*

granny did meals on wheels for 40 years; dad was in Apex for 25; family next door trains labradors for blind people; lady accross the road volunteers at the Op Shop; mum works at a hospital canteen; I coach an u/12s footy team; mate of mine does big brother etc

none of them are religious as far as I know.

It's just what people do.
 
I'm not saying they have to be religious, or that religious people are more public spirited. I'm just saying if religious organisations are going to do it, this is the kind of model I think is good.
 
yeah, I don't disagree - it sounds like a good idea. Just seems to me religious groups get pumped up for all the good they do in the community when there is literally millions of people helping out in their own modest ways.

Probably half this board does some sort of volunteer work from time to time - esspecially if they're parents.

just sayin'
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I agree. I don't care what motivates people to do good deeds - it's that they are doing them which is the important thing. If they are doing it because it's the right thing to do, rather than as a cynical recruitment exercise, then so much the better.
 
I'd agree this model is a good one for anybody to follow. Do good because... it is good to do good. Not sure why they have to label themselves a Christian mission?

Far more effective than, say, the fire and brimstone idiots that rant and rave at people in the Queen Street Mall on Friday and Saturday nights.
 
Far more effective than, say, the fire and brimstone idiots that rant and rave at people in the Queen Street Mall on Friday and Saturday nights.
Are tim flannery and ross garnaut hitting the streets now? ;)
 
evo practically ended this thread with the first reply to the OP.

:thumbsu:

As an aside, I am becoming more convinced by the day that Caesar is Karl Pilkington.

:eek:
 
evo practically ended this thread with the first reply to the OP.
Well not really. As I said, I more started the thread to start a discussion on the best ways religious groups can indulge their mission of community outreach, in a way that helps the broader community without pissing people off (which tends to be the case with most religious community initiatives). The OP was supposed to be an example to fuel discussion, rather than be aggrandisement of religious-based charity.

But as always, thanks for your valuable contribution.
 
Well not really.

Yeah, really.

As I said, I more started the thread to start a discussion on the best ways religious groups can indulge their mission of community outreach, in a way that helps the broader community without pissing people off (which tends to be the case with most religious community initiatives).

Yeah, anybody who believes they have an obligation to help the community can do so without any reference whatsoever to their religion. I'd suggest that would be the best way to not only avoid 'pissing people off', but also to earn respect from those in the community who criticise mass religion.

Personally, I don't think too highly of people who do good for others simply because they believe there is some ooga-booga man watching over them as they do. By making any reference to religion during the course of 'community outreach', religious groups will only garner cynicism from people such as myself who volunteer untold hours and do not expect eternity in heaven for our troubles.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Yeah, really.



Yeah, anybody who believes they have an obligation to help the community can do so without any reference whatsoever to their religion. I'd suggest that would be the best way to not only avoid 'pissing people off', but also to earn respect from those in the community who criticise mass religion.

Personally, I don't think too highly of people who do good for others simply because they believe there is some ooga-booga man watching over them as they do. By making any reference to religion during the course of 'community outreach', religious groups will only garner cynicism from people such as myself who volunteer untold hours and do not expect eternity in heaven for our troubles.

Religious people who speak about their beliefs publicly care little for the respect or lack of it of those that want them silenced.
If you don't want to hear what religious people have to say, because you don't want to be "pissed off," simply don't listen to it. Others may want to listen though. Everyone must decide for themselves.
Does a favourably accepted message that was delivered to a person that didn't know that the message was given to them by a religious person become invalid as soon as the person receiving the message finds out it was given to them by a religious person?

Have you ever considered that some religious folk don't speak to others out of fear of their God, but out of love for their God. In the case of Christians, it's commanded in the bible by God to speak to others about the message of the bible.
The bible also states that eternal life can not be earned by works, but is a gift given by God to those who're considered by Him His friends. To be God's friend, one must do his will; that is to heed His command that's written in the bible of telling others of the bible's message. That is but part of being God's friend.

If a Christian is scared of what others think of them and therefore stop telling others of the bible's message out of fear of persecution, Jesus says that those who're ashamed of him before men, he'll be ashamed of them when making report to his father. That's why true Christians couldn't care less if unbelievers are "pissed off" because of their spreading of the biblical message. True Christians care primarily about what God thinks of them, not those of your ilk.
Just as Jesus was persecuted in his time for the message from his father that he brought forth, the same will occur to those who share the message with others in our time. Yours, and many others whose feelings and reactions are similar to yours, aren't surprising to Christians. It was foretold in the bible.
 
Sorry Jeff, I don't quite follow?

If they are genuine, then they would accept volunteers regardless of their religious beliefs.

They don't, and they don't for a reason.

For groups like this, morality begins and ends with your religious affiliation.

They are a wolf in sheep's clothing.
 
I am a member of the RAOB, several religous charity/welfare groups require me to give that up if I want anything to do with them. Several ancient greek dieties are part of the folk law of RAOB, Christians see them as pagans and pagans are evil, apparantly.
Only because pagan as they call them go back further than christians and christian history does not recognise that.

All is not what it appears.
 
What's a RAOB?

And... being a Christian mission but not making that clear unless specifically asked? I still don't know why you'd then bother to call it a mission. After that point it sort of smacks of false pretences. If they really do not allow non-Christians to be a part of their group that sort of exposes their real motivations.

Holding yourselves out to be secular while the organisation is specifically and exclusively religious is a bit dishonest.

Not easy to call it a black-and-white good or bad.
 
What's a RAOB?

And... being a Christian mission but not making that clear unless specifically asked? I still don't know why you'd then bother to call it a mission. After that point it sort of smacks of false pretences. If they really do not allow non-Christians to be a part of their group that sort of exposes their real motivations.

Holding yourselves out to be secular while the organisation is specifically and exclusively religious is a bit dishonest.

Not easy to call it a black-and-white good or bad.

Not to mention the fact that it has been proven (will search for the source after work today) that a certain chemical used in the production of red frogs actually makes beer taste worse :mad:
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Well not really. As I said, I more started the thread to start a discussion on the best ways religious groups can indulge their mission of community outreach, in a way that helps the broader community without pissing people off (which tends to be the case with most religious community initiatives). The OP was supposed to be an example to fuel discussion, rather than be aggrandisement of religious-based charity.

But as always, thanks for your valuable contribution.

Salvos, World Vision, Mission Australia, Oxfam, Wesley Mission, Brotherhood of St Laurence , The catholic church pays for 25% of third world health care plus plenty more. They will all take anyone as a volunteer. Alot of other charities were started by Christians and still act in the Christian spirit like the RFDS or RSPCA. When it comes down to it generally when you are really ####ed a Christian organisation is probably your last hope whether that be a sisters of charity kitchen in Fitzroy or the nuns who look after most of the orphans in Vietnam.
 
Despite the clever disguise, one can pinpoint a lost relic from the once famous Limbo club.

So thats where they all went.
Gimp, my good man.

The show Glee is riding our coattails.
 
Yeah, really.
Yeah, anybody who believes they have an obligation to help the community can do so without any reference whatsoever to their religion.
Personally, I don't think too highly of people who do good for others simply because they believe there is some ooga-booga man watching over them as they do. By making any reference to religion during the course of 'community outreach', religious groups will only garner cynicism from people such as myself who volunteer untold hours and do not expect eternity in heaven for our troubles.
STEEERRIIIIKE!
They are NOT referencing their religion and you are still caning them!
They are damned either way according to your attitude.
If they are genuine, then they would accept volunteers regardless of their religious beliefs.
They don't, and they don't for a reason.
For groups like this, morality begins and ends with your religious affiliation. They are a wolf in sheep's clothing.
Shades of Commo's under the bed.
I may come across as some sort of apologist for Xians, but really guys, this smacks of bigotry and unaccountable loathing. You are far too intelligent to fall into this.
What's a RAOB?
Royal Antedulivan Order of Buffalo. There was a temple in Geelong in Ryrie St from memory of 40 years ago. Never knew much about them, other than being a mysterious Mason-like mob.
And... being a Christian mission but not making that clear unless specifically asked? I still don't know why you'd then bother to call it a mission. After that point it sort of smacks of false pretences. If they really do not allow non-Christians to be a part of their group that sort of exposes their real motivations.
Holding yourselves out to be secular while the organisation is specifically and exclusively religious is a bit dishonest.
Not easy to call it a black-and-white good or bad.
And your reply is also a bit dishonest, Chief, he of unmatched wisdom.
No suggestion they held themselves out to be secular. That's a construction with a hint of desperation.
I suggest that there is no ulterior motive to disguise their Xianity, rather they are probably over-sensitive to criticism for actually daring to be Xian and altruistic. Can't blame 'em in the light of these entries.
Some, no, MOST Xians try to do good. Some are misguided in their intentions and may think that convincing others to "believe" is the ultimate ticket to heaven, but they are actually mighty thin on the ground. Thank a god or two!
I don't care that Xians are deluded. So what? Deluded is certainly not insidious.
Unless you're just paranoid.
Salvos, World Vision, Mission Australia, Oxfam, Wesley Mission, Brotherhood of St Laurence, The catholic church pays for 25% of third world health care plus plenty more. They will all take anyone as a volunteer. Alot of other charities were started by Christians and still act in the Christian spirit like the RFDS or RSPCA. When it comes down to it generally when you are really ####ed a Christian organisation is probably your last hope whether that be a sisters of charity kitchen in Fitzroy or the nuns who look after most of the orphans in Vietnam.
Pat Robertson and Jim Jones don't define Christianity any more than Fevola defines AFL football.
As an Atheist, I am happy to defend Xians and allow them the freedom to believe - just as I enjoy the freedom to not believe - and to argue with them.
In fact, now I'll double my donation to the Salvos!
So there!! :D
 
And your reply is also a bit dishonest, Chief, he of unmatched wisdom.
No suggestion they held themselves out to be secular. That's a construction with a hint of desperation.
I suggest that there is no ulterior motive to disguise their Xianity, rather they are probably over-sensitive to criticism for actually daring to be Xian and altruistic. Can't blame 'em in the light of these entries.

No it represented my honest thoughts at the time I posted it, Mernieherk.

And if you are out there specifically not mentioning your religious reasons for doing something, but at the same time your organisation is a 'ministry' with all the discrimination that might involve (I have no idea if they reject non-Christians as members or volunteers) then yes, you're damned if you do, damned if you don't. There might be a reason people like to know who they're dealing with, specifically in these outreach situations where the group might be dealing with vulnerable people.

Like I said, it isn't black and white.

They can do what they like, really. Free country.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom