Who deserves/deserved the round 1 rising star nomination?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Hurley? How is Jetta in ahead of him?

Didn't see either game, decision was based on stats.
Have a read of his thread on the main board. And if you watched Melbourne, what about Cheney?Edit: How is Robinson beating Rich? God you Calrton muppets are ridiculous. You single-handedly ruin every poll involving Carlton. I'm all for supporting your team and players, but sometimes you should take off the rose colored glasses for f*cks sake!
Agree, it's ridiculous. These poll choices should all be made public so the clowns can be weeded out.
Anyway, easily a 2 horse race. I watched both closely (as I had both in DT/SC) but I'd say Robinson would be an excellent choice, but wouldn't complain if Rich got it.
Edit: How is Robinson beating Rich? God you Calrton muppets are ridiculous. You single-handedly ruin every poll involving Carlton. I'm all for supporting your team and players, but sometimes you should take off the rose colored glasses for f*cks sake!
67% kicking efficiency says otherwise.Rich deserves it. 21 quality possessions, did some hard work in close and let off some nice long passes. His spear pass to Brown I think it was, late in the game, was fantastic. Looks a real winner does Rich.
I voted for Robinson. He was pretty good. I would vote in this order:How is Robinson beating Rich? God you Calrton muppets are ridiculous. You single-handedly ruin every poll involving Carlton. I'm all for supporting your team and players, but sometimes you should take off the rose colored glasses for f*cks sake!
Didn't see either game, decision was based on stats.
Rich ..played a huge role in turning around a losing game. Showed why he should have been a top 3 pick.
then why is the Crows' nomination Petrenko. Otten had a better game (19 stats vs Petrenko's 15)Didn't see either game, decision was based on stats.
Edit: How is Robinson beating Rich? God you Calrton muppets are ridiculous. You single-handedly ruin every poll involving Carlton. I'm all for supporting your team and players, but sometimes you should take off the rose colored glasses for f*cks sake!
Daniel Rich. Just plain and simple the best player on the field. Robinson seemed to have gotten a lot of help.