Round 12 discussion

[Kadog]

Scored 7 points for knock-ons. Could have had 1 or both of those in the first few minutes.

Don't you know. Fumbles = knock ons.

Bont - 18 touches, 10 Ineffective.

Received 13 points from possessions. -15 for frees.

94 for fluffing around with unmeasurable, subjecting stats. fmd[/QUOTE

This

 

[rocker_oz33]

CD did the same kinda tweet after mummy got 130 odd from like 5 touches.

 

[Kadog]

Thats just a BS table that has no context.

Bont...1 CLANGER...REALLY

I thought cd had a go at me personally.

I'll tweet them ...how the fk do i do that

Do you live under a rock? Use a pidgeon, although I find ravens to be more reliable.

 

[hoddo]

I was perplexed by Bont's score last night but after seeing the breakdown from CD it makes a lot more sense. When we watch a match we generally have access to the SC scores and only the most basic of stats. But SC scores come from many events that simply don't appear in those stats. That's why players like Rance appear to be CD favourites when they're really getting legitimate points for things like spoils, knock-ons and other 1%ers that don't appear on the stats table but net big SC points.

That doesn't mean that there's no bias at play though. I've long believed that CD's statisticians are subconsciously more aware of certain players reputations, especially in certain fields such as tackling and spoiling, and are more likely to subjectively view borderline cases involving those players as being stat worthy while the same actions from other players may not be counted. For example, a defender attempts to spoil a mark and makes only minimal contact. If it's Rance who's a renowned spoiler at gets counted as a spoil but if it's some player without such a reputation it's not. Similarly, Bont kicks the ball to a forward, misses him but the forward gathers the ball anyway and kicks a goal. Bont's a recognised star so it counts as a goal assist but if a lesser player, who the statistician isn't so predisposed to notice, did the same thing it may not be counted because it missed the target. Unfortunately so much of SC's scoring is subjective and CD statisticians are only human.

 

[rocker_oz33]

Fuuuuuu just noticed that plan tree smith named again fuuuuuuuu right offffffffffffffff.

 

[Kadog]

Live scoring is only ballpark figures.
Because unlike dreamteam, SC scoring takes into account the game situation and applies weighting to scores accordingly.

Like when he's pinged HTB. DT deduct -3 whilst CD simultaneously ADD 3pts. Oh I get it now.

 

[toxic]

Do you live under a rock? Use a pidgeon, although I find ravens to be more reliable.

I think I have now sent a tweet / twit/ pigeon or whatever the fk it was to them

and yes - I love my rock i live under

 

[Kadog]

I think I have now sent a tweet / twit/ pigeon or whatever the fk it was to them

and yes - I love my rock i live under

LOL. A rock with a nice swimming pool.

 

[rocker_oz33]

LOL. A rock with a nice swimming pool.

Swimming pool bye the rock....

 

[Mullarkey]

Thats just a BS table that has no context.

Bont...1 CLANGER...REALLY

I thought cd had a go at me personally.

I'll tweet them ...how the fk do i do that

They are trolling you with their tweet bruh, lets go **** em up!!

 

[Dundalis]

2/195 for me, Dahl and Bont... meh.

Having expended my VC loop on Bont, I think I'll go with Doc C. He's due. I don't think Kelly can pump out another big one this week, and Pendles is just a good, honest tryer who'll be shown up by Viney, Tyson and Oliver as past his used-by date... Adams is a possibility...

I know its probably sarcasm, but seeing good honest tryer and Pendles in the same sentence is just odd. Don't think I've ever seen a player dominate football games while seeming to exert such little effort.

 

[toxic]

LOL. A rock with a nice swimming pool.

Ok.

How can i see if I've tweeted someone.

Stupid blue bird

 

[Satan]

How many SC points for Messi tonight? , not too many tackles and likely to be subbed

 

[Mullarkey]

How many SC points for Messi tonight? , not too many tackles and likely to be subbed

late out

 

[Huttabito]

Can anyone remember the formula to work out next week's BreakEvens? TIA.

 

[Satan]

late out

Fan riot

 

[Mullarkey]

Can anyone remember the formula to work out next week's BreakEvens? TIA.

insert beautiful mind gif here

 

[PoopingHindi]

Like when he's pinged HTB. DT deduct -3 whilst CD simultaneously ADD 3pts. Oh I get it now.

actually they add 3.5 but who's counting

 

[Daniel McL]

Can anyone remember the formula to work out next week's BreakEvens? TIA.

c2 = a2 x b2

 

[SC fish]

Can anyone remember the formula to work out next week's BreakEvens? TIA.

E = mc2

 

[Here2tellyouwhy]

Do you reckon Champion_Data prefers Bont's right or left nut? Which "zone" of his scrotum is the higher scoring one?

It depends which is closest whilst the kissing is taking place

 

[TheOz]

It depends which is closest whilst the kissing is taking place

I reckon the starfish gets a good working over too.

 

[Here2tellyouwhy]

I reckon the starfish gets a good working over too.

That'swhy to Bont eats Nonnas pasta every game day

 

[gutsroy]

Can anyone remember the formula to work out next week's BreakEvens? TIA.

BE = (PP/1700)-(Score n-2 +Score n-1)
PP = Prev Price coming into round (like 525320 or whatever), scores n-1, n-2 most recent scores prior to current round
Try that.

 

[Mullarkey]

I reckon the starfish gets a good working over too.

That'swhy to Bont eats Nonnas pasta every game day

I don't even....