George
Premium Platinum
- Aug 17, 2015
- 45,307
- 127,304
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Phi Eagles & Phillies, Liverpool, PAO FC
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #51
Been laughing for a good 10 minutes LOLBoy oh boy this is something else
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Been laughing for a good 10 minutes LOLBoy oh boy this is something else
Of course they won't but that doesn't change the fact that both Ryder and Marshall are both playing very poorly.You really think they’ll drop Marshall and Ryder?
Maybe Roma omitted if he’s unfit, but not a chance they’re both dropped.
We also need to pick the side that gives us the best chance to win. Omitting both rucks and putting in an inferior player doesnt do that.Of course they won't but that doesn't change the fact that both Ryder and Marshall are both playing very poorly.
So its either form - in which case they should be dropped or they are playing injured in which case they shouldn't be playing.
But they'll probably stick with the same set up that yet again put in the half a***sed effort we saw on Friday night.
Whats that definition of insanity again - the one about doing exactly the same thing but expecting a different outcome.
Change it up, give them a kick up the .......
They’ll change some things up - they have to.Of course they won't but that doesn't change the fact that both Ryder and Marshall are both playing very poorly.
So its either form - in which case they should be dropped or they are playing injured in which case they shouldn't be playing.
But they'll probably stick with the same set up that yet again put in the half a***sed effort we saw on Friday night.
Whats that definition of insanity again - the one about doing exactly the same thing but expecting a different outcome.
Change it up, give them a kick up the .......
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Id like to see Sinclair go into the middle and play Hunter in his role.
We also need to pick the side that gives us the best chance to win. Omitting both rucks and putting in an inferior player doesnt do that.
All it does it make us less competitive, make it harder to bounce back and give more fodder to complain about next week.
No.Or is a full Campbell better than an eighth of a Marshall?
We also need to pick the side that gives us the best chance to win. Omitting both rucks and putting in an inferior player doesnt do that.
All it does it make us less competitive, make it harder to bounce back and give more fodder to complain about next week.
Or a Ryder who is a little bit off the boil.Or is a full Campbell better than an eighth of a Marshall?
Yes, very boring to selection from the coaches to try and get a finals spot by selecting our best players in each position. They should have been throwing the magnets around for the sake of it rather than doing what has been getting us wins so far this year.Or a Ryder who is a little bit off the boil.
The problem is that Marshall is injured so CAN"T play first ruck so they can't give Ryder a rest and then play two lumbering big men (cos that's what Marshall is at the moment) in Marshall and Campbell.
Campbell has played one game this year, played 50 % of game time and yet still managed to still get his hands on the ball about as much as Ryder or Marshall.
Play Campbell as the main ruck and pinch hit with Dougal, Darragh Joyce or Battle (Its Ladhams and Sam Reid ffs) and load up on mids.
The problem is the selection panel believes we need two ruckmen (even if they are unfit or underperforming) so they select two ruckmen.
Ratten starting to look very boring. Membrey to the back half woo hoo (and people canned Richo!!)
Problem is that Sinclair is elite across HBF and in AA form there. Hunter has never been close to that type of form across 4 quarters even if he is good in flashes. And just right now he is neither fully fit, or match conditioned.
Sinclair is exceptional at both defence and offense. Losing him across HB will hurt us.
Fixed it for you. Its a very easy argument to make that X is better than Y when you never try Y.Yes, very boring to selection from the coaches to try and get a finals spot by selecting our best FITTEST players in each position. They should have been throwing the magnets around for the sake of it rather than doing what has been getting us wins so far this year.
Clarke come out before Byrnes.In: Steele, DMac, Highmore
Out: Byrnes, NWM, Paton
B: Webster, Howard, Wilkie
HB: Sinclair, Battle, Highmore
C: Hill, Ross, McKenzie
HF: Billings, Membrey, Gresham
F: Higgins, King, Marshall
R: Ryder, Steele, Crouch
Int: Jones, Long, Clark, Butler
NWM goes back to VFL, lifted in the third but some of his efforts defensively in the first half were shocking. DMac returns but I’d also love to see Hill given another chance on the wing with him, looked dangerous forward of centre earlier this year.
Ronnie was a complete passenger last night unfortunately, Steele back in. Have Paton out for Highmore, makes our defence pretty tall however with Jimmy/Sincs/Long we should have enough balance to cover their smalls. Highmore and Battle should give us some real intercept ability, would be a treat to see Ratts give them the chance in the same back 6.
Hoping Sharman returns after another strong VFL showing later today however structure wise another tall forward could be a risk vs Sydney, some interesting selection calls coming up.
Sharman needs to play and make paddy account just like he did with stewardSwans off their own disappointment. Paddy to 3rd man up all day on King, with 0 followup from our boys. Franklin kicks 5.
Forward line needs play like one. Not king alone or Higgins runnings back into the 70meters of space because we apparently need 17 players to achieve anything in the back half
Then maybe they can’t afford to double or triple team max every time either.I think Membrey plays his best footy deep at FF and I would put him back there and move Max up to HF which would require him to move around more, as he is a witches hat for parts of games at the moment. Roma has a bad leg and needs to have rest. Bring in Windy in the midfield and and Joyce will have to come in possibly at CHB and run Battle in the ruck with Paddy, maybe even Sharman comes in so we can get that forward half working.
That game had more room than in my 4 bedroom 3 family room home with me on my my own. There is simply no room in our forward line because our mids don’t get it in quick enough. Footy is simple without an opposition. Watch the saints train and they go to different forwards all the time because it’s nearly one on one footy. The reality though is in a game it’s team defence and unless you are either a brilliant kick or a midfield that can use it quickly it’s nearly impossible to pick out one player. Doesn’t help that none of the 3 talls we have are natural leading forwards.Then maybe they can’t afford to double or triple team max every time either.
Just for once I would like to see us go “ I’m about to kick it to max but max has 3 on him , so that means membrey is standing there by himself- ok I ll kick it to him instead “
We play such dumb footy sometimes.
I watched the bulldogs forwards leading towards the player coming at him all night last night.
Would be nice if we could do that occasionally.