Remove this Banner Ad

Round 9 Discussion

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'd run with Williamson. What's the worst that could happen? He scores a 30 and you miss out on 20 points. He scores 50, you breakeven. He scores more, you profit

This exact logic cost me a league win last week.

"Parsons 38, hmm yeah I'll go with Simpkin why not, surely he can't get that much lower than 38."

*Simpkin gets 5*
*Lose cash league by 10 points*
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

As one of the few who didnt vc danger :( Now need to minimize the damage. who to vc / c?
Heeney
Jpk
Titch

Into yeo or jjk
 
For the money Dangers been a spud this year. Average was 114 before last night. Spud.

Mind you at under 600k spud becomes stud. Welcome next week Danger.
If Danger is a spud, then how do you rate Adam Treloar :eek:
 
This exact logic cost me a league win last week.

"Parsons 38, hmm yeah I'll go with Simpkin why not, surely he can't get that much lower than 38."

*Simpkin gets 5*
*Lose cash league by 10 points*
Hahaha oh boy. Well then, flip a coin lol
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Just having a look at my league match up with 'playing' rookies comparison.

Me: Newman, Marchbank, Fisher, Myers

Him: Otten, T.Stewart, Taranto, J.Stewart

Pretty confident in mine, although will come down to how well Otten goes, particularly without JJ.

Match up pretty well otherwise
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Was trying to decide whether to cover my Witts donut .....but in checking out my main leagues, it appears some didn't have Dangerfield as a (vc) or (c) option ....and there's donuts also in their sides, so i'll ride this week out
 
Just having a look at my league match up with 'playing' rookies comparison.

Me: Newman, Marchbank, Fisher, Myers

Him: Otten, T.Stewart, Taranto, J.Stewart

Pretty confident in mine, although will come down to how well Otten goes, particularly without JJ.

Match up pretty well otherwise
Fisher looks to be the iffy player in those matchups ??......i have him as well, and my expectations of his score isn't great :(
 
4/565c
Not bad. I'm taking parsons 47. Hannan won't get that. 47 could be 2 weeks for hannan!
You have to roll the dice on Hannan .......if he stinks it up and only gets a 35, you've only lost 12 points ......but if he kicks a couple of goals on the MCG against Nth Melb, you'll kick yourself ......low risk, go for it
 
If Danger is a spud, then how do you rate Adam Treloar :eek:
Was my (C) until Dangerfield last night ......still trying to decide if i accept a 151 or go Treloar ? ...........:p
 
You have to roll the dice on Hannan .......if he stinks it up and only gets a 35, you've only lost 12 points ......but if he kicks a couple of goals on the MCG against Nth Melb, you'll kick yourself ......low risk, go for it
3 game average of 38.
47 is 20% higher than his rolling average.
I would have taken 40 from parsons.
North will beat the dees...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom