- Joined
- Jun 6, 2000
- Posts
- 37,137
- Reaction score
- 65,094
- Location
- West Perth
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Woomera Centrals, Jazza
With the strips Man City and Chelsea are wearing, a 'blue on blue' was inevitable...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
The dopes at the AFL would have wanted clash jumpers. With colour TV and HD there was absolutely no problem distinguishing the teams last night on SBS's coverage. Shit even with black and white Tv watching somewhere in Africa it would have been a dark team strip vs a white/light team strip.With the strips Man City and Chelsea are wearing, a 'blue on blue' was inevitable...
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
As per the article I linked on the previous page, poor goalkeeping continues to be the achilles heel of Australian soccer.The Reds were 1-0 down to Newcastle and then the Newcastle keeper made a complete balls-up with a free that was kicked to him instead of crossed in and punched the ball into his own net.

Fifa at its meeting tonight - daytime Euro time voted unanimously for a 48 team comp in 2026 World Cup. 16 groups of 3 teams 2 advance from each group to knock out 32 stage then knockout 16 etc. 80 games instead of 64 games so will have to add an extra week or more.
Great opportunity for corruption as currently the last games of the group stage ie 4 teams in 8 groups the last 2 games are played at the same time to avoid teams playing dead to block another team advancing. With 3 teams in each group you won't be able to use current system. Reckon it was the 1990 WC a team played dead - reckon it was Austria to stop someone advancing and the rule was introduced to play fina 2l group games at same time.
Thanks for the correction. I knew Italy and Germany were involved somehow. 1990 Italy was host and Germany won and thats why I thought it was 1990.1982 Spain was host Italy won the WC and Germany was the team Austria helped out and made the final against Italy.The one you're thinking of does concern Austria but it was 1982 in Gijon in Spain where West Germany needed to win by 1 or 2 goals and then both sides would advance at the expense of Algeria.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disgrace_of_Gijón
There was also a similar accusation levelled at Argentina and Peru after the 1978 World Cup. This was later confirmed by an Argentinian senator.
Wh
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...cheated-World-Cup-1978-says-Peru-senator.html
Fifa at its meeting tonight - daytime Euro time voted unanimously for a 48 team comp in 2026 World Cup. 16 groups of 3 teams 2 advance from each group to knock out 32 stage then knockout 16 etc. 80 games instead of 64 games so will have to add an extra week or more.
Great opportunity for corruption as currently the last games of the group stage ie 4 teams in 8 groups the last 2 games are played at the same time to avoid teams playing dead to block another team advancing. With 3 teams in each group you won't be able to use current system. Reckon it was the 1990 WC a team played dead - reckon it was Austria to stop someone advancing and the rule was introduced to play final 2 group games at same time.

make that 8...almost guaranteed the wooden spoonYou know things have turned to tripe when the last-placed Reds are sitting 5 points below the team sitting 9th![]()
I think the large majority of that golden generation of Socceroos players from the 90's and 00's were given an AIS scholarships.Can't speak for Olympics but not sure if government spending in soccer is the answer. Personally believe what is required to consistently make a quarter final in the world cup can't be brought through a public purse. Just ask England. I could easily argue that the rise of SASI and AIS in soccer has lead to less Australians finding a profession in the big leagues around the world.
Not sure why this is even a conversation piece. Public spending should really only be there to help fund industry that produces a public benefit that would not be ultimately achieved if left to the private sector.
I doubt anyone would argue that the investment into AO hasn't paid a public dividend despite my personal dislike of SACA and the SMA. I'd also struggle to understand how the same amount invested in any international sport would pay a public dividend anywhere as close.
.....He is just really frustrated that the game he loves and grew up with, isn't as big in Oz compared to where he grew up...
Spot on.I resent his belief that soccer belongs as the #1 sport in every country by virtue of the fact it's the most popular game in the world. I suppose when he travels to Italy he tells them to stop eating pasta and eat McDonald's and KFC instead 'cos......."get with the program!!".
I think the large majority of that golden generation of Socceroos players from the 90's and 00's were given an AIS scholarships.
When Hill talks about government monies he is talking about infrastructure. If you put a grandstand roof on the eastern stand of Hindmarsh it would help get bigger crowds when it's 35-40 degrees. Invest in putting grandstand roofs all around Hindmarsh including filling in the 4 current vacant corners, get ground capacity up to 25,000 and then you have a better chance of selling out games and increasing attendaces when games are played in stinking hot conditions. Regularly get 20,000 plus crowds at a world class stadium means Adelaide United have more $$$ which it can plough into better players, keep the better Oz players here, invest imore in junior programs and training facilities and better coaches etc. Thats the argument he has long made about government monies not government investing in players and replacing basic revenue streams. Just look at Port's transformation financially by playing at Adelaide Oval. That is what he is getting at. If you can't see how Port was transformed by having a better stadium you will never understand his argument.
The A league has to look at the MLS in North America. The clubs are building rectangle stadiums with 25,000 to 30,000 capacity ( its the sweat spot of cost and spectator facilities and capacity at 90%+ at most stadiums) and a few clubs are playing at NFL stadiums just using the lower tiered seats and restricting capacity to low 30k capacify with the Seattle Sounders pushing out the Seahawks' stadium to about 42k. Playing games at ovals that the clubs and or league don't own or are screwed on the stadium deal or poor rectangle stadiums is a big factor in limiting the games ability to keep up with leages in Asia let alone Europe.
Send the english to the most beautiful beach on the planet and they'll whinge about sand
I think the large majority of that golden generation of Socceroos players from the 90's and 00's were given an AIS scholarships.
When Hill talks about government monies he is talking about infrastructure. If you put a grandstand roof on the eastern stand of Hindmarsh it would help get bigger crowds when it's 35-40 degrees. Invest in putting grandstand roofs all around Hindmarsh including filling in the 4 current vacant corners, get ground capacity up to 25,000 and then you have a better chance of selling out games and increasing attendaces when games are played in stinking hot conditions. Regularly get 20,000 plus crowds at a world class stadium means Adelaide United have more $$$ which it can plough into better players, keep the better Oz players here, invest imore in junior programs and training facilities and better coaches etc. Thats the argument he has long made about government monies not government investing in players and replacing basic revenue streams. Just look at Port's transformation financially by playing at Adelaide Oval. That is what he is getting at. If you can't see how Port was transformed by having a better stadium you will never understand his argument.