- Banned
- #276
Forgot to say also woke up with a boner .....
SO ITS DEFINITELY OVER THE LINE!
SO ITS DEFINITELY OVER THE LINE!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: St Kilda v Hawthorn - Rd 12 - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Hawks at 66% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists » -- All Rd 12 Games
Pick 22, Lucas, Bower and McLean for pick 15 = getting our Backdoor absolutely smashed in! Would be very disappointed if this was to go through, hopefully we get Goddard but not willing to lose this much over him.
It's not that we are losing McLean and Bower, TBH I really couldn't care less that we are losing those two. But if Adelaide can demand a first round draft pick for a kid that has played one good game then surely we could do the same for Lucas, why would we have to throw in pick 22. I'd rather keep pick 22 and just give Richmond Lucas and McLean for pick 15. Thats my only reasoning behind.You'd be kidding. We lose pick 22 and 3 Bullants players to improve our shot at the flag. That's what you do when a premiership window is opening up.
Anyway, don't think you have much to worry about because as a rumour it'll start and finish at that.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
The only thing right about this post is that McLean is overpaid.
He was B&F in a VFL grand final side. I'd suggest that if his name wasn't McLean and he wasn't contracted at an exhorbitant price there would be a lot of clubs lining up to sign him a la Duigan and Barlow.
If St. Kilda are looking to clear room in their salary cap, why would the be taking 2/3 players as well as a pick in exchange?
Hey don't get me wrong if he can get an opportunity else where goodluck to him, and goodluck if he can go to a team and play all 22 games without injury. But which team would want to take the risk? also which team would want to take him based on his contract?The only thing right about this post is that McLean is overpaid.
He was B&F in a VFL grand final side. I'd suggest that if his name wasn't McLean and he wasn't contracted at an exhorbitant price there would be a lot of clubs lining up to sign him a la Duigan and Barlow.
The fact that he couldn't make our side doesn't mean he would not have been a regular in at least another 10 sides this year.
I hope we can trade him to, at least, give him a chance to prove the knockers on this board wrong and if we can I hope he does just that. Still deserves a chance and not likely to get it here.
Hey don't get me wrong if he can get an opportunity else where goodluck to him, and goodluck if he can go to a team and play all 22 games without injury. But which team would want to take the risk? also which team would want to take him based on his contract?
I don't want to get into a fight about Brock McLean because whether he stays or goes I really don't care, I just find it hard to believe this trade rumour with him involved.
Is this official?Pick 62 for Dylan Buckley
Experts think it is a 'bargain'
Pick 62 for Dylan Buckley
Experts think it is a 'bargain'
Would be pick 80 at this stage, pending trades and swaps of picks.
Haven't we #98 live or does the Mulberry bush come out again?
"Goddess"

My favorite time of year on BF.Right up there with the lead up to Round 1 v Richmond.

"Goddess"

Once this week is over, then we have the round 1 preview thread to deal with FOR MONTHS![]()
![]()
![]()
Parrot will keep us amused through that period.
No one baits the Richmond faithful better. Expect 5000 posts.![]()
