Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
dids4 said:********ing hell.
didnt grima from north miss like 18 weeks with a dislocated shoulder last year?
Rusling was injured when rookie Harry O'Brien appeared to roll on top of him as the pair contested for the ball during the third quarter
FIGJAM said:We've had a share of problems, but at least this year, it's to the kids.
FIGJAM said:It is bad news, particularly if he has weak shoulders. Hopefully it's just bad luck. Given his #1 asset equal with speed is his overhead marking, I hope he gets over his shoulder problems asap.
That said, there's time before the season and I personally don't have him in my best 22 just yet, so there's even more time.
We've had a share of problems, but at least this year, it's to the kids.
doppleganger said:spot on figgy
bad news and do really feel for the kid
but on a positive note he aint one of the pies gun players let alone a certain best 22 player, so no major disruption to the pies best team as of yet
But the play of the day belonged to Chris Tarrant, who nailed one from the boundary line, which prompted a teammate to yell: "Make it look hard next time".

I don't think we were ever settled. Josh did his knee injury in 2004 and it simply resurfaced several times despite our desire to get him on the park. Buck's hammy was always going to twang again pre-surgery and he was stuffed. Didak's knee was gone early. Richards was perpetually crook. Tarrant's knee was barely good enough to get him on the park all year.Madd Matt said:That's one.
Do you all have such short memories? 12 months ago (well, 13 to be more precise) we were "fit and firing for 2005 with no injuries, except for Richards who was expected to recover early in the season". What happened?
Between January and March we lost Fraser, Bucks injured his hammy (not badly, but an indication of later things), I'm sure there were more injures (Didak(?)), and then by Round 4 we were missing our top four players and our season is over.
Why are people getting so excited that we are "fit, keen, strong, and hungry" in early Feb? I would call that 'normal', and anything less would be a disappointment. If we are still all those adjectives April/May, then I'll get excited!![]()
FIGJAM said:I don't think we were ever settled. Josh did his knee injury in 2004 and it simply resurfaced several times despite our desire to get him on the park. Buck's hammy was always going to twang again pre-surgery and he was stuffed. Didak's knee was gone early. Richards was perpetually crook. Tarrant's knee was barely good enough to get him on the park all year.
Then we had a host of others in the "Infirmary". It never looked good, despite the fact that we managed, in theory, a near full strength team against the Bulldogs.
This year, there's no sign of injuries to anyone but first and second year players. Whilst that ain't ideal, it's not exactly like we can rely on them to give us any more than cameos at this stage.
Yeah, everything can go to ******** again in a matter of minutes, but there's no point beating yourself up about something which hasn't happened yet!
