Belly said:He's not better then Mackie and Tenace still needs more time to develop.
You tried to name hacks, and they'll still be better then Dyson, how about putting him up against our good young players.
So Tenance who was drafted in 2003 we shouldnt judge because he still needs time to develop? But Dyson who was drafted in the same year should be judged on what he has done right now? Hmmm ok...
Im not going to be drawn into a slugging match about whose got the better younger players. Dyson has shown glimpses of some great things to come imo. Has an absolutely leathal left boot. Just starting to get a little bit of game time, but we havent seen him playing an extended role in the midfield so far so its hard to judge.
I for one would definatley not trade Dyson for Ferguson. One for the future imo..
Not under-valuing Ferguson though. Is a player i think we should definatley look at. I dont know how valuable Solomon would be to the dees however. But with Ferguson rotting away in the twos they arent exactly losing a great deal there. Not gaining much either tho.





