Remove this Banner Ad

Roast Same Players, Same Result

  • Thread starter Thread starter rines
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Watching the third quarter now in WA. Absolutely disgraceful.
Slattery bought his own soap for the bath Betts is giving him. I wonder if its the same bar he took to Ballantyne???? He must have a photo of Hirdy with a goat.
Disagree with the comments about Pris. I thought it was his best game for the season. And Stanton did try hard.

Agree with all of this 100%.

The change was made rines. Slattery was moved from Garlett onto Betts after McVeigh gave up two quick ones.

And because Slattery gave up a goal and a couple of easy touches with his led boots on to Garlett during the same period. Niether match up was working.

.
 
The thread would have died after 10 posts - If the Slattery apologists - conceded that he played poorly ( which he did along with a few others) instead of mounting ridiculous arguments.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

And here it goes again.

Who cares if he had 5 goals or 8 goals or 12 goals kicked by his opponent - He had a poor game.


Yes he did, an absolute shocker (and i am a huge Henry fan).....along with 3/4 of his team mates. Yet none of them are subject to the same crap, abuse, personal slagging that Hank gets. (Stants, Monfries, Dyson included to some extent)....

All this crap, that he useless, a liability, "i'm a better player him", "my grandma could do better" is disrespectful. And i doubt anyone on this board would be a better player. These people will only highlight the bad (plenty of them on against carlton), but will never admit to the good (a handful at best against carlton)..yet make excuses for others who played just as badly or even worse. Everyone of those people will forgive or make excuses for their errors, because they are quick, or can jump really high, or are jets.

I have no issue with people who think he is not good enough and make good points. That's what these forums are for. Discussion and opinion. These posters also have the decency to at least say well played when Henry does play well. I have issues with people who abuse for the sake of abusing and then still abuse when he has a good game. It's a freaking joke.

Not having a crack at you yaco, just frustrated.


EDIT: English and Grammer not good at all tonight
 
And here it goes again.

Who cares if he had 5 goals or 8 goals or 12 goals kicked by his opponent - He had a poor game.

All the people who look at Betts's final goal tally and blame Slattery for 8 goals.
 
I'm sorry if the total goals were what drew your eye.. his overall performance was poor and hence he has been dropped.


Are you going to disagree with Hird too BTG?

At the end of the day it doesn't matter.. and I didn't just mention hank in the OP.. but several others too.

Lets hope another clean out in 2011 and ready for huge 2012.
 
I don't think anyone was denying he was poor.

Having said that, seems others have a lot more chances whereas Hank gets dropped after every bad game.

If Hank was dropped after every poor game he would hardly have played 2 games in a row for his career. There has never been a player receive more unearned opportunities than Hank. He is not AFL standard, he has never been AFL standard and it seems the coaches are finally noticing the bleeding obvious.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom