Sat 30 Jun 2007 Herald Sun Front Page

[Pies_10]

This is an absolute disgrace to not exactly blame Didak but if you've read it you'll know what i mean the mother of the man killed on that day said that if Didak came forward her son might still be alive. It's no her fault to say that but for the sun to interview her over that incident is a disgrace more media over doing things..

 

[anti.]

get used to it. every case of a west australian drug addict is ben cousins fault.

 

[Jabso]

Don't take too much notice. If the media hound the mother of the victim what else is she going to say. If she said "yeah I guess you could say he could've stopped it..." the media would stop the tape there and just run with that quote.

 

[mdc]

Banned user trolling - Jabso

Ok, now this has to be right at the top of the imbecile scale. But, you know what, I'll bite, since this is the sort of crap that idiots like to perpetuate.

Let's say Alan Didak "reported" what happened.
Alan Didak: "Yeah, I was in a car with Christoper Hudson and I saw him firing shots".
Officer: "What state were you in."
Alan Didak: "Well actually, I was pissed off my head, even blacked out once or twice..."

So then they go to interview Hudson and his mates, all of whom obviously deny it.
So we have the testimony of 1 blind-drunk man vs. two or more (relatively) sober ones. Obviously this is never even getting to trial.

So now Christopher Hudson, who is still a free man, yet probably grumpier, is LESS likely to shoot anyone? Are you kidding me? And now Alan Didak has to look over his shoulder wherever he goes.

The Police KNOW the Hell's Angels are involved with guns, drugs etc...they don't need a public figure putting his life in danger to tell them this, especially when his testemony will carry no weight whatsoever given his state at the time.

 

[buckstheking]

Ok, now this has to be right at the top of the imbecile scale. But, you know what, I'll bite, since this is the sort of crap that idiots like to perpetuate.

Let's say Alan Didak "reported" what happened.
Alan Didak: "Yeah, I was in a car with Christoper Hudson and I saw him firing shots".
Officer: "What state were you in."
Alan Didak: "Well actually, I was pissed off my head, even blacked out once or twice..."

So then they go to interview Hudson and his mates, all of whom obviously deny it.
So we have the testimony of 1 blind-drunk man vs. two or more (relatively) sober ones. Obviously this is never even getting to trial.

So now Christopher Hudson, who is still a free man, yet probably grumpier, is LESS likely to shoot anyone? Are you kidding me? And now Alan Didak has to look over his shoulder wherever he goes.

The Police KNOW the Hell's Angels are involved with guns, drugs etc...they don't need a public figure putting his life in danger to tell them this, especially when his testemony will carry no weight whatsoever given his state at the time.

100% Correct