Official Match Thread Season 32: Round 2 - Fighting Furies Vs Baghdad Bombers @ rfctigerarmy's hippodrome

Remove this Banner Ad

Yet somehow your team mate turned it into something else entirely.

Someone needs to have a quiet word with him.
I'm good mate, if Crowinfiji didn't collate Ned's reporting with Rioli's innocent comment on children's lunchboxes then their would be no profanity. By saying it was reportable Fiii implied profanity, that's on him.
 
Admit it, you want to be a bomber.

Another F**** cliche line.

Is this on the 3rd page of the Bombers “How to SFA” guide—- I feel that I’ve heard this line from half a dozen different posters in the past year.

The only thing original about your CrowInFiji is your inability to shut up when you put your foot in it
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Another F**** cliche line.

Is this on the 3rd page of the Bombers “How to SFA” guide—- I feel that I’ve heard this line from half a dozen different posters in the past year.

The only thing original about your CrowInFiji is your inability to shut up when you put your foot in it

I'm waiting for your next sermon to begin, Padre. Please enlighten me on how to better banter by spending 8 hours arguing PC norms.
 
I'm waiting for your next sermon to begin, Padre. Please enlighten me on how to better banter by spending 8 hours arguing PC norms.

If you’re still this upset by the pronoun discussions from earlier today (which is have no idea why you want to circle back to that now, but anyway) —- maybe have a chat with BLUEALLTHRU via PM first.

It was his “revolutionary” idea to include preferred pronouns into the SIM, not mine.
 
If you’re still this upset by the pronoun discussions from earlier today (which is have no idea why you want to circle back to that now, but anyway) —- maybe have a chat with BLUEALLTHRU via PM first.

It was his “revolutionary” idea to include preferred pronouns into the SIM, not mine.

Oh * me now you've made me so rushed I skipped page 4 of the manual where I was meant to be a meatshield again.
 
I'm good mate, if Crowinfiji didn't collate Ned's reporting with Rioli's innocent comment on children's lunchboxes then their would be no profanity. By saying it was reportable Fiii implied profanity, that's on him.
If everyone took what was implied on this site, and took it to its extreme conclusion, there would be no one left unreported after a day.

Asking someone to share could become a rallying cry to turn the whole world socialist by claiming you were implying that no one should be able to have anything that someone else doesn’t have.

It is easy to find offence if you have an agenda. Not saying no offence is ever given on this site, the faux outrage and attributing your thoughts to someone else is only okay if the subject matter is allowable under the site rules. Otherwise it just comes across as trying to get someone banned for something they didn’t do.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

You’ve squibbed all night and come in with this rant at the end.

I preferred the old BAT that was prepared to speak for himself rather than sending out the meat shield to speak on his behalf.

Calm down Rambo.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top