He's also got less chins. 2/3.He's a less rational and less competent version of Clive Palmer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's also got less chins. 2/3.He's a less rational and less competent version of Clive Palmer.
A thread by Cycon? "trying to contact him (Senator Nutcase), about a different sporting integrity matter"Madison is a complete lunatic, no doubt, and just the next in a long, long conga line of *******s who have publicly supported EFC throughout this; but how has no-one picked up on the real reason this thread exists?
The OP has obviously seen Madigan on his "crusade" for justice and spammed the Honourable Senator about a certain case involving a wronged and betrayed young footballing superstar and a Mum who just wants to see justice done against the vast AFL conspiracy that has single-handedly ruined their lives.
And then when the Honourable Senator didn't respond, indicating even the fruitcake can identify another fructose flavoured confectionary when he sees one, the enraged Mum posts on old faithful (where she knows she will get a reaction that she needs to make it through another day) about the corruption of the Senator she just recently saw as her salvation.
And so it goes let it go, let it go
Madison is a complete lunatic, no doubt, and just the next in a long, long conga line of *******s who have publicly supported EFC throughout this; but how has no-one picked up on the real reason this thread exists?
The OP has obviously seen Madigan on his "crusade" for justice and spammed the Honourable Senator about a certain case involving a wronged and betrayed young footballing superstar and a Mum who just wants to see justice done against the vast AFL conspiracy that has single-handedly ruined their lives.
And then when the Honourable Senator didn't respond, indicating even the fruitcake can identify another fructose flavoured confectionary when he sees one, the enraged Mum posts on old faithful (where she knows she will get a reaction that she needs to make it through another day) about the corruption of the Senator she just recently saw as her salvation.
And so it goes let it go, let it go
One of my favourite* sayings is for evil to prosper, it needs only good men to do nothing.oh it was picked up on, but some things are best left alone
A thread by Cycon? "trying to contact him (Senator Nutcase), about a different sporting integrity matter"
Honestly how long before this turns into another thread about how their kid should be an AFL superstar but the conspiracy and evil recruiters wanted to keep him out of the system after some failed beep test or something as 14 old and some unrelated injury? This is honestly possibly the saddest continuously running false narrative farce on BigFooty ever. You always had these types of parents at junior footy games I guess, but this online and offline vendetta spanning possibly almost a decade is just laughable.
Allegiances? Ha! Of course I'm somehow part of the conspiracy - the plot thickens...woooo!! (That's sarcasm - figured you might need a hand with that)Ah yes, Crawb. How about you telling us your allegiances?
Curious you always pursue it.
Yes, a lot of money has gone into GWS, but it doesn't mean they should escape the law.
Allegiances? Ha! Of course I'm somehow part of the conspiracy - the plot thickens...woooo!! (That's sarcasm - figured you might need a hand with that)
This is just soooo sad it's funny. Your kid wasn't that good. I mean it's junior football in Canberra - there's a reason only one kid or so every few years gets drafted from the region - the talent is not that good. Big fish small pond etc etc. Like if a player is not even playing NEAFL (or AFL Canberra First Grade back when this presumably began now) or NSW/ACT Rams state side level they're not even making it to TAC Cup in Victoria if they lived elsewhere for example. Never a chance at AFL. Seriously, wake up and just move on.
http://m.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news...ecret-essendon-documents-20160502-gokbxv.html
Which member of the press will get to do the exclusive?
Independent Victorian senator John Madigan has won his bid to secure the release of secret documents relating to the Essendon injecting program.
While the Federal government and opposition successfully opposed his call for an independent inquiry into how the Bombers' case was handled by the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority, Madigan was able to secure the release of key documents in his motion in the Senate on Monday.
These documents include the final report of ASADA's investigation into the Bombers, dubbed Operation Cobia, the review of that operation by former Federal Court judge Garry Downs for former Sport Minister Peter Dutton, a separate review of ASADA for former Sport Minister Kate Ellis and the decision in March last year by the AFL Anti-Doping Tribunal to clear the players of doping allegations.
Is there any obligation on senators to not relate or discuss the detail in the report publicly?http://m.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news...ecret-essendon-documents-20160502-gokbxv.html
Which member of the press will get to do the exclusive?
Independent Victorian senator John Madigan has won his bid to secure the release of secret documents relating to the Essendon injecting program.
While the Federal government and opposition successfully opposed his call for an independent inquiry into how the Bombers' case was handled by the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority, Madigan was able to secure the release of key documents in his motion in the Senate on Monday.
These documents include the final report of ASADA's investigation into the Bombers, dubbed Operation Cobia, the review of that operation by former Federal Court judge Garry Downs for former Sport Minister Peter Dutton, a separate review of ASADA for former Sport Minister Kate Ellis and the decision in March last year by the AFL Anti-Doping Tribunal to clear the players of doping allegations.
That will be VERY interesting.Is there any obligation on senators to not relate or discuss the detail in the report publicly?
Is there any obligation on senators to not relate or discuss the detail in the report publicly?
That will be VERY interesting.
Would have thought the acc report would give madigan a dose of reality and the afl stuff is minor as compared to the big pictureThe investigators report and Downes report in particular.
It seems to have been forgotten that Dank was charged with administering more substances than just TB4 to the players. Releasing these kind of reports could contain info on other substances and discussions around the pros and cons charging the players with using them. Likely has these discussions around TB4.
Seems to be a belief on behalf of some EFC supporters that the release of these documents will show how it's a stitch up and a witch hunt on behalf of ASADA. I'm not sure that's the case, the Downes report for example could just as easy raise questions how did the AFL tribunal find the players not guilty.
Bock stuff could also be interesting in regards to ASADAs decision making why did they go with the EFC 34 first.
Seems Madigan going to get the documents, but is he going to like what they tell him?
Would have thought the acc report would give madigan a dose of reality and the afl stuff is minor as compared to the big picture
Can't imagine Bock stuff being released as ASADA have said they are revisiting it based on Danks admission. And I wonder if Madigan did this knowing full well the government would be in caretaker mode and nothing would actually happen? (Big noting himself before an election). If he does get access, I dont think he's going to like what he sees in any case. Reckon the AFL and Essendon would be quietly shitting bricks over this.