Senator Reynolds

Remove this Banner Ad

A quick read of Sofronoffs Report relating to Senator Reynolds seems to offer fertile ground to suggest the NACC would make short work of any investigation into her complaint of the conduct of the Higgins pay out.

Not that taking out the boss (A/G Dreyfus) will make for an easy life though it does demonstrate an independence not available to its Victorian counterpart.

The Sofronoff report isn't worth the paper it's written on.
 
The Sofronoff report isn't worth the paper it's written on.
There are serious problems with democracy in Australia when former judges are breaking the law for political gain.

Every single pillar of democracy - Executive, Legislature, Judiciary, Media - are all severely compromised now. What is happening in the USA and Israel with regard to the Judiciary is outright scary.

 

Log in to remove this ad.

There are serious problems with democracy in Australia when former judges are breaking the law for political gain.

Every single pillar of democracy - Executive, Legislature, Judiciary, Media - are all severely compromised now. What is happening in the USA and Israel with regard to the Judiciary is outright scary.


'London to a brick' the RWNJs are going to argue that Commissioner Holmes' Robodebt report is other side equivalent simply because of how badly it makes an ex-PM look.

Sofronoff's conduct here has the potential to completely undermine confidence in the judiciary, which puts us another step closer to Americans.
 
There are serious problems with democracy in Australia when former judges are breaking the law for political gain.

Every single pillar of democracy - Executive, Legislature, Judiciary, Media - are all severely compromised now. What is happening in the USA and Israel with regard to the Judiciary is outright scary.


You need to take your blinkers off. What political gain are you alleging any former judge may receive ?

Unrelated as it is to Senator Reynolds .
 
You need to take your blinkers off. What political gain are you alleging any former judge may receive ?

Unrelated as it is to Senator Reynolds .
Sofronoff is pushing a political agenda around innocent until proven guilty. That was the subject of his cancelled speech. Which is fine.

But if you want to be an activist on that issue then excuse yourself from undertaking a formal enquiry on that issue.
 
Sofronoff is pushing a political agenda around innocent until proven guilty. That was the subject of his cancelled speech. Which is fine.

But if you want to be an activist on that issue then excuse yourself from undertaking a formal enquiry on that issue.
So he's running a political agenda for what gain, that political gain you are claiming ?

Is it a professional agenda that he is engaged in ? A KC with an interest in the law that doesnt suit your political agenda ?
 
I think people are forgetting that Lerhman has multiple accusations of sexual assault that came out in court.
Linda Reynolds is way out of line and this channel 7 bs is a disgrace.





"Within that same initial period, allegations were published to the effect that the man who had sexually assaulted the complainant was also accused of having sexually assaulted or harassed a number of other women," the court documents said.
 
So he's running a political agenda for what gain, that political gain you are claiming ?

Is it a professional agenda that he is engaged in ? A KC with an interest in the law that doesnt suit your political agenda ?
Lerhman has had multiple accusations of sexual assault against him so why would you believe him and Reynolds?
 
Lerhman has had multiple accusations of sexual assault against him so why would you believe him and Reynolds?

You are obviously choosing to ignore the Matters prosecution involving the same DPP & defence lawyer in the same time frame.
'Mr Whybrow told The Australian: “For good or bad, our criminal justice system is an adversarial one and if an accused person is not permitted (within appropriate bounds) to challenge the accuracy or veracity of a witness, even if the collateral effect may be humiliating or embarrassing, it’s hard to see how there can be a fair trial.”

By all means Ari, remain wilfully ignorant of why 'multiple accusations of sexual assault against him so why would you believe him' is rejected by the Rule of Law 'innocent until proven guilty.

As for Ms Reynolds she is within her legal rights to have her story told. The story that the A/G effectively guillotined in the Higgins payout. She will have her day in Court at her own expense.
 
You are obviously choosing to ignore the Matters prosecution involving the same DPP & defence lawyer in the same time frame.
'Mr Whybrow told The Australian: “For good or bad, our criminal justice system is an adversarial one and if an accused person is not permitted (within appropriate bounds) to challenge the accuracy or veracity of a witness, even if the collateral effect may be humiliating or embarrassing, it’s hard to see how there can be a fair trial.”

By all means Ari, remain wilfully ignorant of why 'multiple accusations of sexual assault against him so why would you believe him' is rejected by the Rule of Law 'innocent until proven guilty.

As for Ms Reynolds she is within her legal rights to have her story told. The story that the A/G effectively guillotined in the Higgins payout. She will have her day in Court at her own expense.
Stop quoting the Australian who leak txts of an alleged but also real rape victim that have a political agenda.
Reynolds is a scumbucket.
 
When we actually find out wtf Bruce Lehrmann is and how he became a senior advisor at Defence despite being singularly unqualified and inexperienced we'll be a lot closer to finding out why the conservative press and members of the previous government have gone to the mattresses to run a protection racket for him.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

When we actually find out wtf Bruce Lehrmann is and how he became a senior advisor at Defence despite being singularly unqualified and inexperienced we'll be a lot closer to finding out why the conservative press and members of the previous government have gone to the mattresses to run a protection racket for him.

Now that is a good question, too easily overlooked. A protection racket for the benefit of ... ? ...
 
wow!
Update (6/8/23): Walter Sofronoff has gone into hiding. I emailed him some questions at 10:45 AM today (6/8/23) & he responded at 12:06 PM saying he is out of the office until 17 Nov 2023. (Click here to see the questions on Twitter)

I assume he is holidaying with John Margerison.

I can only assume at this stage the Liberals have bought a remote island somewhere with the money they stole off Australian tax payers where they can all go and hide for life. A prayer room was the first building finished.

This is some massive culture war the LNP/Murdoch/Stokes are running.

Innocent until proven guilty ey' Kwality

The leaking of the report by Walter Sofronoff is a criminal offence under section 17 of the ACT Inquiries Act 1991Nondisclosure of information by members etc” “A person who is or has been a member, a member of the staff of aboard or a lawyer assisting a board must not,” “produce to any person, or permit any person to have access to, adocument provided for this Act.” which is punishable by up to 6 months jail.

As a former Queensland Supreme Court judge and Solicitor-General of Queensland Walter Sofronoff would know that so he has no defence to his crime.


Nothing To See Here GIF by Giphy QA
 
Because everyone else has a political agenda but Kwality is completely neutral having been informed by the book of The Australian.
Not just The Australian newspaper but Janet Albrechtsen's little corner of it ffs - the Chair of the right-wing Institute of Public Affairs, who is an advocate/cheer leader for right wing culture 'anti woke' identity politics rather than a journalist.

The fact nearly all of her stuff is posted behind a subscriber-only paywall is a godsend for most of us with a functioning brain. But sadly we get slabs of the stuff cut and pasted in every second thread as stand alone commentary which is not just embarrassing but mind numbingly idiotic.

I've been advised to put the the Murdoch Bot on ignore but keep coming back for the lols.
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top