should the george soros open society forum be banned?

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

CM86 said:
As the most powerful and intelligent member in your left hand, could you please give an estimate on how much is spent on ad space, vs how much is spent on the ad, the info gathering, the research etc?
Click to expand...
Put your brain into gear and think. What kind of audience do you think you’d get if you ordered $1000 worth of ad space on Facebook or television? Prime time / millions of people, or after midnight / a couple of dozen?

Does not matter how much you spent on producing the ad!
 
its free real estate said:
Put your brain into gear and think. What kind of audience do you think you’d get if you ordered $1000 worth of ad space on Facebook or television? Prime time / millions of people, or after midnight / a couple of dozen?

Does not matter how much you spent on producing the ad!
Click to expand...

Please dont overload him!
 
its free real estate said:
Put your brain into gear and think. What kind of audience do you think you’d get if you ordered $1000 worth of ad space on Facebook or television? Prime time / millions of people, or after midnight / a couple of dozen?

Does not matter how much you spent on producing the ad!
Click to expand...
$1 into ad spending... if you'd spent $1 million on developing and targeting it, with fake accounts pushing it, and fake accounts opposing it.
Yeah $1 in ad revenue could go a long way.

The tip of the iceberg isn't evidence of the totality of the iceberg.
The money spent on the courier system isn't evidence of the true money spent, nor reflective of the influence.
 
CM86 said:
$1 into ad spending... if you'd spent $1 million on developing and targeting it, with fake accounts pushing it, and fake accounts opposing it.
Yeah $1 in ad revenue could go a long way.
Click to expand...
If that $1 spent on broadcasting only displays that ad to one person then how?
 
its free real estate said:
If that $1 spent on broadcasting only displays that ad to one person then how?
Click to expand...
If it's perfectly targeted to some Instagram celebrity with 40,000 followers. Of which 1,000 believe what ever their 'god' supports.
That's $1 well spent.
Then they spend $500,000 opposing and supporting the position of that Instagram celebrity... Now they've got 10,000 people supporting their agenda.

They get it to go viral.

Now they have 4 million people talking about it. 1 million of which are supporting and pushing it.

Not bad for $1 of advertising.
 
CM86 said:
If it's perfectly targeted to some Instagram celebrity with 40,000 followers. Of which 1,000 believe what ever their 'god' supports.
That's $1 well spent.
Then they spend $500,000 opposing and supporting the position of that Instagram celebrity... Now they've got 10,000 people supporting their agenda.

They get it to go viral.

Now they have 4 million people talking about it. 1 million of which are supporting and pushing it.

Not bad for $1 of advertising.
Click to expand...
Do you think Facebook etc are muppets? If you’re paying $1 for advertising they’re not showing that promoted post to high volume audiences.

Mark Zuckerberg isn’t worth $70 billion because his social networks allow global reach for chump change.
 
Seeds said:
No. I believe gradual movement to a globalised world based on humanism, democracy and free markets is a very good cause. In fact the best cause there is.
Click to expand...

Well i think that is different to destroying Nationalism that Soros seeks.
 
its free real estate said:
Do you think Facebook etc are muppets? If you’re paying $1 for advertising they’re not showing that promoted post to high volume audiences.

Mark Zuckerberg isn’t worth $70 billion because his social networks allow global reach for chump change.
Click to expand...
Are you serious?

No I'm not saying you can pay $1 for it... I was trying to use easy numbers to explain a point.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Seeds said:
Is it though?

And to be fair to soros in his lifetime the most well known nationalists were Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao, Ho Chi Minh and the kims. Can you really fault him for wanting to smash what they stood for?
Click to expand...

Good lord, why do you always get it wrong, Paul Hogan was the best known Nationalist we have had here.

You are on a completely wrong level.

Think Manu Feidel as a French Nationalist who loves French cooking, culture etc and loves to share it, in Soros world the things that separate us and give us our National identity must be destroyed to create a EU.
 
Les Malone said:
Good lord, why do you always get it wrong, Paul Hogan was the best known Nationalist we have had here.

You are on a completely wrong level.

Think Manu Feidel as a French Nationalist who loves French cooking, culture etc and loves to share it, in Soros world the things that separate us and give us our National identity must be destroyed to create a EU.
Click to expand...
Source?

Soros has literally made billions in currency pairing (his Yen trades are legendary), and he's a capitalist. I highly doubt he would want the rationalisation in national economic policy that would accompany any breakdown of national borders.
 
Mofra said:
Source?

Soros has literally made billions in currency pairing (his Yen trades are legendary), and he's a capitalist. I highly doubt he would want the rationalisation in national economic policy that would accompany any breakdown of national borders.
Click to expand...


www.realclearpolitics.com

George Soros: Connoisseur of Chaos | RealClearPolitics

George Soros: Connoisseur of Chaos | RealClearPolitics
www.realclearpolitics.com www.realclearpolitics.com

I linked on page one.

At least 49 meetings with EU.

His 15 billion $ trust is called Open Society !!
 
According to the public calendar of Members of the Commission(1), in the past four years George Soros has had at least 15 face-to-face meetings with the President, the First Vice-President and other Vice-Presidents of the Commission, as well as Commissioners.

According to lobbyfacts.eu(2), lobbyists from one of George Soros’s NGOs, the Open Society European Policy Institute, had at least 49 meetings with senior Commission officials (Commissioners, members of Cabinets and Directors-General) between 2014 and 2018. In recent years, therefore, George Soros and his lobbyists have held a total of at least 64 meetings with senior Commission officials. No Head of State or Government of any EU Member State had the opportunity to directly consult the Commission’s leadership on so many occasions.

According to the public calendar of Members of the Commission, on 31 May 2017 Commissioner Christos Stylianides received George Soros for a face-to-face meeting.

In relation to that meeting I would like to ask:

—Who proposed it and why was it arranged?
—What was discussed during the meeting?
—Does the Commission consider it appropriate for a person who has no political mandate based on democratic elections and who is a well-known businessman to be allowed to consult the Commission’s most senior officials so frequently?


www.europarl.europa.eu

Parliamentary question | Relationship between George Soros and the Commission | P-000308/2019 | European Parliament

Question for written answer P-000308/2019 to the Commission Rule 130 Andrea Bocskor (PPE)
www.europarl.europa.eu www.europarl.europa.eu
 
Mofra said:
That snippet about making a political donation in no way supports the claim that he wants to break down national borders.
If anything it supports the concern many have on this forum (on both 'sides') about political donations influencing democracy.
Click to expand...

You need to read the full article i think.
 
Taylor said:
There might come a time when nations will sell a corporate seat in the senate for $200B to knock down debt and give the big influence businesses transparency for their goals. It would be a scary path to start down if we have 3 x Corporate Senators in the Upper House, for an injection of $600B.
Click to expand...
The hilarious thing is they would fight over it - but fight tooth and nail over 50 million in tax
 
Les Malone said:
Good lord, why do you always get it wrong, Paul Hogan was the best known Nationalist we have had here.

You are on a completely wrong level.

Think Manu Feidel as a French Nationalist who loves French cooking, culture etc and loves to share it, in Soros world the things that separate us and give us our National identity must be destroyed to create a EU.
Click to expand...
Um thats a tv actor. Not someone in politcs.

You have to accept the fact that those leaders were rampant nationalists. They rejected immigration, rejected universality and believed their nation should be superior to others. They fostered love of their nation ahead of not only foreigners but themselves. Laws, courts, universities and the medias primary purpose is to be instruments of the nation, for the nation and nothing but the nation. They are where nationalism leads. You are an inferior nationalist compared to them. Atleast for now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

nut
George Galloway Rochdale by election winner.
Replies
14
Views
631
Ballarat Bob
B
CD Xbow
Saudi Arabia to chair UN forum on women's rights
Replies
5
Views
315
Ballarat Bob
B
Gough
Trump Bibles and trainers, what products should other Presidents have endorsed?
Replies
1
Views
243
Satan
Satan
Carringbush2010
  • Poll
Societies under autocratic rule are protesting, while democratic societies have a beef with liberal capitalism
Replies
22
Views
745
bfff
bfff
Osho
USA George "Costanza" Santos
3 4 5 6 7
Replies
159
Views
16K
Satan
Satan
Jetafl
Oceania NZ smoking ban for future generations.
Replies
10
Views
753
owen87
owen87
nut
BRICS and the reduced power of the US dollar.
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
barreness
barreness

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top