Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Kerr is the one i think could be around your pick. Has kicked bags in the TAC and i would expect him to do the same in the u18 championships.Good to have you back Skippos
IMO you have Korewha listed at 182cm he is 192cm
Hoping the Dogs can gain a player(s) who can kick bags. Who at this stage are the best players that would be around the dogs picks?
Good to have you back Skippos
IMO you have Korewha listed at 182cm he is 192cm
Hoping the Dogs can gain a player(s) who can kick bags. Who at this stage are the best players that would be around the dogs picks?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I can't help but be more interested in Josh Battle. Ran 3km @ 10.03 and from small viewing from Friday night he held his own and bagged a couple. Do you see him staying around that 7 range or like some others see him going higher? He seemed to get a lot out of the trip to the U.S. and does seems quite primed to have a big year. Possibly not someone the Lions would go for seeing we went for Schache last year but as you can see with Melbourne and Bombers now needing help for their young KPF I wouldn't cross it out.
.
Ainsworth has gone for a slide there Skip....Size the only reason?
Korewha is a very interesting one. What I have seen from him is pressure at high intensity when the ball is near him and good speed. I think his best position isn't down back, and he should be used as a wingman really.
Do you think the Lions will go midfielders this year getting Seaton and Allison in the Lions midfield would be amazing
I think Leppitsch sees McStay as a defender with Gardiner Andrews Paparone and Cutler I suppose it depends on where we finish if Seton is available I'm all for him this year I don't think forwards really are a must right now with Walker Freeman Schache Close and swingman Hipwood already on our list we are still struggling in contested possessions so maybe a contested beast with some paceI'm not that sure on him, quite simply. I need to see more of him. He's fleet footed but is he *that* quick? Is his kicking *that* good? Like Petracca, I'm wanting to see his impact through the middle before committing to a high evaluation of him. He could well be a Dion Prestia type - in fact, I suspect he will be; but with a better forward game and overhead game. But that a top 3-5 prospect? I'm not sure yet. IQ is terrific though. He's very much in my 'watch and see' pile.
I tend to agree. His development could go either way this year; it'll be fascinating to watch. I'm intrigued to see more of him as a third forward.
It depends on their confidence level in certain positions. And where McStay's future lies. If it's back - Schache needs a partner. I suspect they'll go best available; especially if Allison isn't the first pick they make.
I think Leppitsch sees McStay as a defender with Gardiner Andrews Paparone and Cutler I suppose it depends on where we finish if Seton is available I'm all for him this year I don't think forwards really are a must right now with Walker Freeman Schache Close and swingman Hipwood already on our list we are still struggling in contested possessions so maybe a contested beast with some pace
An excellent summation of our KPP on our list and couldn't agree more with what you have said which leads to the interest in Battle. Sadly I think we will have 1-3 by the end of the year and will be looking to see how Battle goes throughout the season to see if he projects as going around that mark or if Scwab has the balls to trade down to his mark. GWS currently have three first round picks (Carlton, Collingwood and theirs) and most probably Freo's to get McCarthy back west. Lot of water to go yet though.There's a significant difference between 'forwards' and good forwards. There's a difference; good forwards win you games, poor forwards can be the reason you lose.
Close and Freeman were drafted in ranges that haven't produced a successful key forward for a long, long time. Nothing is an exact science in football but the one thing that does hold up to analysis is that key forwards are either found in the first round or through alternative means; mature age recruitment or alternative talent recruitment. Stock standard 18 year old year forwards taken outside the top 20 do not succeed, as a general rule. Looking at Freeman and Close thus far I'd consider Close as good as gone from a forward point of view and only with a hope of making it as a defender, and Freeman capable of getting to the level Walker is at now and no further.
Walker is not the answer. He brings the ball to ground, which has him ahead of some - but does little else. He will not be a franchise forward. As the #1 man while Schache develops, he struggles. As the #2 man, he's meagre at best. He's the kind of guy you want playing magoos who can come up and provide a contest in case of injury.
Quantity does not equal security or quality. Unless something comes from nowhere, you will need to find another forward. That may be McStay. It may be Paparone working his opponent into the ground. It may even be Andrews. But it will not be Freeman, Close or Walker. Hipwood could be the man if you like him forward.
If Hipwood projects as a defender (in which case there's an oversupply there. I believe Hipwood, Paparone, Andrews, Gardiner, McStay and Cutler all make the grade as defenders) then you'll need to find a friend for Schache immediately.
I still like Foley from the Western Jets. His practice match form was good and his season opener of around 30 touches against Oakleigh was impressive.Probably not going to see as much of me as in other years but thought I'd still make a thread and update/post when I can. As the season emerges I'll start writing profiles and making comparisons, but for now I'm happy to answer questions/take feedback based on my current top 50/anyone outside it.
Full discloure though - my sample base for now is all SA players and those juniors who played recorded football in some capacity. There are players out there getting hyped that I simply haven't been able to see. I'll be able to help regarding most players, but with regards to say, a Josh Daicos, I'm no use to you! For those I've seen little of I'm just taking in the opinions of those I trust. As the season goes on I'll be exposed to them and form an opinion.
Without further ado (and full disclosure that the top 50 will change rapidly as I see things I like/dislike in players)
![]()
Hey Skippos love reading your power rankings + draft profiles each year. Just wondering what you see in Josh Rotham to have him in your top 5? Cheers.
hi skippos
what are josh rothams stand out features?dont think the eagles will snag a kpd with our first but I would like us to pick one up at some stage
Skippos I'm a big fan of yours but I'm not sure this summation of our KPP is entirely accurate. My main question- why would the club have guys like Close/Freeman/Walker on the list if they think there's zero chance of them becoming a serviceable AFL standard key forward?There's a significant difference between 'forwards' and good forwards. There's a difference; good forwards win you games, poor forwards can be the reason you lose.
Close and Freeman were drafted in ranges that haven't produced a successful key forward for a long, long time. Nothing is an exact science in football but the one thing that does hold up to analysis is that key forwards are either found in the first round or through alternative means; mature age recruitment or alternative talent recruitment. Stock standard 18 year old year forwards taken outside the top 20 do not succeed, as a general rule. Looking at Freeman and Close thus far I'd consider Close as good as gone from a forward point of view and only with a hope of making it as a defender, and Freeman capable of getting to the level Walker is at now and no further.
Walker is not the answer. He brings the ball to ground, which has him ahead of some - but does little else. He will not be a franchise forward. As the #1 man while Schache develops, he struggles. As the #2 man, he's meagre at best. He's the kind of guy you want playing magoos who can come up and provide a contest in case of injury.
Quantity does not equal security or quality. Unless something comes from nowhere, you will need to find another forward. That may be McStay. It may be Paparone working his opponent into the ground. It may even be Andrews. But it will not be Freeman, Close or Walker. Hipwood could be the man if you like him forward.
If Hipwood projects as a defender (in which case there's an oversupply there. I believe Hipwood, Paparone, Andrews, Gardiner, McStay and Cutler all make the grade as defenders) then you'll need to find a friend for Schache immediately.
Josh Battle, Patrick Kerr, Ezekial Frank and Allison also plays HFF at times and with his height might be able to play a third type tall.Skippos I'm a big fan of yours but I'm not sure this summation of our KPP is entirely accurate. My main question- why would the club have guys like Close/Freeman/Walker on the list if they think there's zero chance of them becoming a serviceable AFL standard key forward?
Close has played 10 games as a forward and looked okay before his ACL. How has he suddenly become no hope of making it as a key forward?
Freeman has better judgement of the ball in flight, speed, marking, clean hands, height, game sense and a decent set shot routine than Walker, who hasn't been too bad this year. Has a huge amount to work on though, but the raw talent is there. Just my thoughts, but the main thing is to play these guys this year to get a good read on what our needs are, what positions they will end up in and if they'll make it.
Are there any Crameri/Gunston/Tom Lynch (Adelaide) type 3rd tall forwards in the draft this year? I think we need that connecting type player.
There's a significant difference between 'forwards' and good forwards. There's a difference; good forwards win you games, poor forwards can be the reason you lose.
Close and Freeman were drafted in ranges that haven't produced a successful key forward for a long, long time. Nothing is an exact science in football but the one thing that does hold up to analysis is that key forwards are either found in the first round or through alternative means; mature age recruitment or alternative talent recruitment. Stock standard 18 year old year forwards taken outside the top 20 do not succeed, as a general rule. Looking at Freeman and Close thus far I'd consider Close as good as gone from a forward point of view and only with a hope of making it as a defender, and Freeman capable of getting to the level Walker is at now and no further.
Walker is not the answer. He brings the ball to ground, which has him ahead of some - but does little else. He will not be a franchise forward. As the #1 man while Schache develops, he struggles. As the #2 man, he's meagre at best. He's the kind of guy you want playing magoos who can come up and provide a contest in case of injury.
Quantity does not equal security or quality. Unless something comes from nowhere, you will need to find another forward. That may be McStay. It may be Paparone working his opponent into the ground. It may even be Andrews. But it will not be Freeman, Close or Walker. Hipwood could be the man if you like him forward.
If Hipwood projects as a defender (in which case there's an oversupply there. I believe Hipwood, Paparone, Andrews, Gardiner, McStay and Cutler all make the grade as defenders) then you'll need to find a friend for Schache immediately.
Skippos I'm a big fan of yours but I'm not sure this summation of our KPP is entirely accurate. My main question- why would the club have guys like Close/Freeman/Walker on the list if they think there's zero chance of them becoming a serviceable AFL standard key forward?
Close has played 10 games as a forward and looked okay before his ACL. How has he suddenly become no hope of making it as a key forward?
Freeman has better judgement of the ball in flight, speed, marking, clean hands, height, game sense and a decent set shot routine than Walker, who hasn't been too bad this year. Has a huge amount to work on though, but the raw talent is there. Just my thoughts, but the main thing is to play these guys this year to get a good read on what our needs are, what positions they will end up in and if they'll make it.
Are there any Crameri/Gunston/Tom Lynch (Adelaide) type 3rd tall forwards in the draft this year? I think we need that connecting type player.
I'd imagine that our first pick this year will be selected with an eye on next years draft and how Connor Ballenden is shaping up over the course of this year. Was measured at 198cm not that long ago. I'd imagine that a combo of Schache and Walker/Close/Freeman/Hammelman will be ok for the next few years with Ballenden to come in as that second KPF in 3-4 years.
Tbh he's more likely to be here for our next windows than most of our current mids unfortunately. Unless keays, mathieson, rolls and Allison can step up quickly and push guys like hardwood, Lester, beams and bewick out and be major upgrades, we may play finals in 3 years time but we won't have a windowWhen I made this thread - there was a Brisbane academy forward sitting in the back of my head but I couldn't for the life of me remember his name. The weekend made it rather obvious; it was Ballenden. I agree; most decisions you make should be with Ballenden in mind. If the point of view is that he's a potential franchise forward and partner to Schache, provided you're confident he'll be ready for your window - it probably isn't a need you should cover this year. He's one I'd forgotten in my initial assessment.