Steven Baker found guilty

[Footylover1]

Geebus on a high horse....I'm crying here...

You got post 1000, congratulations. lol

 

[JeffDunne]

I say again....let it go...get over it...

I'd say the same to you.

Seriously, why do Freo supporters care so much?

The player that was on the receiving end doesn't have an issue with Baker, doesn't think he's a sniper and doesn't think he should be suspended.

But still you losers are here gloating over a loss.

If you didn;t wear purple then I'd be surprised with your bitterness, but alas I'm not. 12 years of (W)AFL leg-ups and you're still out of September. That would get to anyone.

 

[sherb]

68 pages????

Can someone do a quick summary for late-comers?

I'll take a guess....

Dirty pr%$k, got what he deserved.

or

Saint Stephen has never missed a Sunday sermon. He doesn't even go out at night.

That, together with some reasonable assessments of the situation and also some less than savoury stuff.

Pretty much your average BigFooty thread after yet another controversial tribunal decision.

 

[The Big Cheese]

There are blocks that happen all the times but the difference is that 99% of players protect themself but in Farmer's defense 99% of players haven't had countless braincells destroyed from substance abuse and petrol sniffing and who knows maybe his wife even fights back every now and then.

so by this logic i could potentially smash an alcoholic over the head with a crowbar... but my defence would be that 99% of people would duck... so the charges would be dropped... yeh good one!

 

[tarky]

if it was judd istead of baker would he have got the same treatment by the tribunal?

 

[retroparty]

if it was judd istead of baker would he have got the same treatment by the tribunal?

No because Baker has a very bad record

 

[Kram]

if it was judd istead of baker would he have got the same treatment by the tribunal?

Imagine it was Robert Harvey instead of Farmer . . .

 

[the-shamus-the]

Imagine it was Robert Harvey instead of Farmer . . .

He would have got out of the way, and he wouldnt have been trying to charge Baker...

 

[MeeSo]

if it was judd istead of baker would he have got the same treatment by the tribunal?

No simply because Judd isn't a dirty sniper with a long history of dog acts.

Robert Harvey wouldn't have even been charged.

 

[Plugga]

if it was judd istead of baker would he have got the same treatment by the tribunal?

Judd would've got 4 weeks...but not 7 as he isn't a dirty little bastard such as the scragging hold u at every bouncedown that Baker is.

 

[JeffDunne]

Geebus on a high horse....I'm crying here...

Would you like to have a crack at explaining why St Kilda might not be successful if we took this to court?

C'mon Lachy, I'm trying ever so hard to get you to post something intelligent and remotely adding to the discussion.

If you're having trouble finding an adult to help you with an answer let me know I'll PM you some hints.

 

[tarky]

i'm just looking forward to the main man hutchy's report....he should have an "inside scoop", ahh what would we do without him

 

[the-shamus-the]

Judd would've got 4 weeks...but not 7 as he isn't a dirty little bastard such as the scragging hold u at every bouncedown that Baker is.

Strange, I seem to remember Judd in a little eye-gauging incident earlier in the year and I also seem to remember seeing him throw an elbow in Baker's direction, I have never seen Baker do that before he just gets in your ear because he is a nippy little barstard which is something no one will deny but the fact is there is no evidence that he did anything wrong he should therefore be proven innocent...

 

[JeffDunne]

if it was judd istead of baker would he have got the same treatment by the tribunal?

I hope that was a rhetorical question?

 

[Plugga]

Would you like to have a crack at explaining why St Kilda might not be successful if we took this to court?

C'mon Lachy, I'm trying ever so hard to get you to post something intelligent and remotely adding to the discussion.

If you're having trouble finding an adult to help you with an answer let me know I'll PM you some hints.

You will get nowhere with the team of lawyers you have at the moment

 

[retroparty]

i'm just looking forward to the main man hutchy's report....he should have an "inside scoop", ahh what would we do without him

I don't know if its just me but having hutchy on the footy show really sucks. He wrecks the show. They go from a bit of laid back fun to some serious hack who has got no idea

 

[Chopsticks]

1,000+ posts on a sniper found guilty twice.

Thankyou St Kilda and supporters.

For a young club like Freo you're certainly an example to us of how not to run a club.

1966 and counting

 

[JeffDunne]

Judd would've got 4 weeks...but not 7 as he isn't a dirty little bastard such as the scragging hold u at every bouncedown that Baker is.

No he's a lying bastard.

If he didn't have people lie for him he'd be known as a dirty little eye gouging bastard.

I suspect his carry over points from that exercise would have got more than 4. That is if the tribunal wasn't so biased and operating to the (W)AFL's agenda.

 

[Plugga]

No he's a lying bastard.

If he didn't have people lie for him he'd be known as a dirty little eye gouging bastard.

I suspect his carry over points from that exercise would have got more than 4. That is if the tribunal wasn't so biased and operating to the (W)AFL's agenda.

Fair enough

 

[JeffDunne]

1,000+ posts on a sniper found guilty twice.

Thankyou St Kilda and supporters.

For a young club like Freo you're certainly an example to us of how not to run a club.

1966 and counting

lol,

1 > 0

That's right, zero, zip, nothing.

Not one award, no history, nothing.

And funniest of all - you chose to wear purple.

 

[MeeSo]

No he's a lying bastard.

If he didn't have people lie for him he'd be known as a dirty little eye gouging bastard.

I suspect his carry over points from that exercise would have got more than 4. That is if the tribunal wasn't so biased and operating to the (W)AFL's agenda.

Give it up. You're embarassing yourself.

It was an illegal and completely unecessary block which caused a player injury. It's the definition of reckless.

 

[MeeSo]

lol,

1 > 0

That's right, zero, zip, nothing.

Not one award, no history, nothing.

And funniest of all - you chose to wear purple.

Give them a hundred years and i think even Freo could match that stellar achievement.

 

[the-shamus-the]

Give it up. You're embarassing yourself.

It was an illegal and completely unecessary block which caused a player injury. It's the definition of reckless.

Did you see it?, I wouldn't say it was unnecessary if he didn't block him he would have been charged by Farmer...

 

[the-shamus-the]

Give them a hundred years and i think even Freo could match that stellar achievement.

That's a bit of a stretch

 

[Ripper]

Ignoring all the anti Freo /Farmer stuff most people would have to agree that seven weeks is very harsh no matter what anyone has done.

You would have to go a way to convince me that Baker actually meant to inflict so much damage.

I actually feel a bit sorry for him as He will feel that he has let his team down.