Jacky boy is more of a Marks & Sparks type of product isn't he?
Dr. Martens maybe? Fashionable but with a touch of campaigner
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jacky boy is more of a Marks & Sparks type of product isn't he?
How is that not human nature? Humans want money. He isnt gonna sit on 35k a week for two years if he cant engineer a move. I think we will sell him though no doubt but if we dont, we will see him sign a new deal I think.That's not human nature mate. His reaction would be along the line of 'fcuk you then Liverpool'. Raheem will be compensated via a sign on fee for lost wages in 2 years if he's not sold. The relationship between pool and Sterling appears to be far worse than the relationship suarez and the club had. Not too extreme to say that the relationship is untenable.
35,000 pounds a week. £1.82m annual income.
How will he survive on such a measly wage?
Anyway, isn't there another thread for this s**t?
You tell me i can't do something. I'm putting all my efforts into doing it. Agree with the rest of your post.How is that not human nature? Humans want money. He isnt gonna sit on 35k a week for two years if he cant engineer a move. I think we will sell him though no doubt but if we dont, we will see him sign a new deal I think.
But yeah it seems untenable. The fans never turned on Suarez. They have on Sterling. He'll go, were just waiting for City to offer the 50 which they will.
How is that not human nature? Humans want money. He isnt gonna sit on 35k a week for two years if he cant engineer a move. I think we will sell him though no doubt but if we dont, we will see him sign a new deal I think.
But yeah it seems untenable. The fans never turned on Suarez. They have on Sterling. He'll go, were just waiting for City to offer the 50 which they will.
But going on a Webster ruling can.He has two years left on his contract so going for free next season cant happen.
I knew he would. Loves the club.Skrtel's sticking with Liverpool.
Has anyone ever done that though, a high profile player?But going on a Webster ruling can.
Very happy for you.I knew he would. Loves the club.
You're risking a lot though. What if he breaks a leg or needs a knee reco. What if he doesnt put his heart into the two years at Liverpool and falls our of favour, doesnt play. No longer gets picked for England. So much can happen over two years.But he will make back any lost money on his next contract?
Lets say he is "losing" 6.5m over two years (65k a week); He sees out his contract, signs with whoever and gets a nice big new contract AND signing on fee of 7 million.
Bam, hasn't lost anything. In the exact same position he would have been in.
Normally quite expensive for a £50m rated player on big wages.Has anyone ever done that though, a high profile player?
So no then?Normally quite expensive for a £50m rated player on big wages.
You're risking a lot though. What if he breaks a leg or needs a knee reco. What if he doesnt put his heart into the two years at Liverpool and falls our of favour, doesnt play. No longer gets picked for England. So much can happen over two years.
If somebody puts a contract in front of you where you can make 7 million over two years. You take it. It's security, it's huge money for your family.
If he cant engineer a move which im sure he will anyways, then he will surely sign a new deal IMO.
The great Inter? Its not the 1960's.not even the great inter could entice skrtel luvs lfc too much so happy he is staying.
Not sure why it matters. No high profile player left on a Bosman until the first one did.So no then?
theyve won a lot more than your club has in recent times.The great Inter? Its not the 1960's.
What would we ever do.
She might not be an angel, but is that really an appropriate comment from a moderator?