footynuts99
Debutant
- Banned
- #26
I rekon you're being a bit rough on Lockyer. In 2003 he had a knee re-co and stress fractures in his foot. Perhaps he has lost some of his pace.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Why can't Ablett beat a hack? This is the 2nd time he's been carved up by Tarkyn.martyk said:True, and Lockyer had 18 touches of which all were uncontested, including marks. Collingwood controlled the play most of the game (Geelong were terrible!) and Lockyer ran around like the girl he is into space to get easy touches, which is what this thread is about.
Thankyou for giving me another chance to back up the topic - Lockyer is a HACK!!
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
jabso said:Why can't Ablett beat a hack? This is the 2nd time he's been carved up by Tarkyn.

Because Ablett didn't contest with him on the night.martyk said:Collingwood controlled all the play you idiot. If Lockyer "beat" Ablett, why didn't he win any(NONE!) contested ball against him?
so let me get this straight, what you are saying is that while his team was getting flogged, the bloke a number of people have said could quite well be the future captain of the geelong football club, allowed a... what was it? "soft, pansy hack" to do as he pleased under absolutely no pressure whatsoever.martyk said:Collingwood controlled all the play you idiot. If Lockyer "beat" Ablett, why didn't he win any(NONE!) contested ball against him? I explained this in the post you quoted. Due to Geelong getting creamed, our forwards had no hope... we have all seen this hack getting towled up once his midfield stops winning contests so lets just leave it there.
Why is it always collingwood supporters who require in-depth explanation of everything... pfft..![]()
Collingwood 22. 14. (146) def. Geelong 6. 8. (44)martyk said:Collingwood controlled all the play you idiot. If Lockyer "beat" Ablett, why didn't he win any(NONE!) contested ball against him? I explained this in the post you quoted. Due to Geelong getting creamed, our forwards had no hope... we have all seen this hack getting towled up once his midfield stops winning contests so lets just leave it there.
Why is it always collingwood supporters who require in-depth explanation of everything... pfft..![]()
i think i was the only one defending him at the time, do i get a medal or something?A lot of people with egg on their faces in this thread.

Playing like one atm after a promising start. Needs to be moved out of the backline or out of the team.

He sure is.
i wouldnt even "" unexpected! just rub it outYeah right, I avoided this thread knowing that Tarks would be our biggest "unexpected" improver in 2007, Don't you agree?
Haha. revived this dead topic to show all those ****ers on bigfooty what idiots they are.Who wrote this stupid topic is a hack. Lockyer's a star.
I still reckon he plays best on a half forward flank.Playing in a totally different position now. Love him on the ball. As long as his job isn't to stop a small forward I'm happy. The bloke is just too unaccountable in the back pocket.
lolI was defending him!!!
In other threads![]()
