- Joined
- Sep 23, 2004
- Posts
- 17,386
- Reaction score
- 17,938
- Location
- Adelaide
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- San Antonio, Redbacks
Hi all, just a query out of my curiosity.
Last year I worked retail, doing about 16 hours a week for 8 months, 40 hours a week for 2 months and not at all for 2 months. My tax was taken out of my pay from a week to week basis.
I naturally assumed due to the fact that I didn't work for two months my tax liability would have been overestimated by the periods where I worked 40 hours a week and I would be eligible for a tax refund. Yet, now that I work it out, I owe the Tax man about $300, how on earth did this happen?
Last year I worked retail, doing about 16 hours a week for 8 months, 40 hours a week for 2 months and not at all for 2 months. My tax was taken out of my pay from a week to week basis.
I naturally assumed due to the fact that I didn't work for two months my tax liability would have been overestimated by the periods where I worked 40 hours a week and I would be eligible for a tax refund. Yet, now that I work it out, I owe the Tax man about $300, how on earth did this happen?





. At work experience that I am doing MYOB does it automatically and we used the 2007/08 tax brackets and rules for Summer school earlier this year.
Epic Fail!