Remove this Banner Ad

Teams Team Development (SC GOLD Picker)

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bored shitless on the train so here's another interation, 1.03.
First time i've taken the byes into account.
Chucked in a few more of the higher priced rookies so if we have a shortage come round one I won't have to totally re-structure my team to fit them in.
Docherty is a star will drop in price a bit but Carlton have a nice early draw, willing to pay the price to have him from the get go. 100+ easy.
I've never picked Rance before because KPP are scary. But he has been scoring well the last two years so it seems like a pretty safe pick. Didn't really like any of the defenders priced above him anyways. Edged out Laird due to better bye round, edged out JJ because I already have like 3 dogs.
Backing Hartlett to bounce back, having a genuine ruckman back will help him out. I think having a few Port/GC premos won't hurt too much in round 9 and will be very handy across the other bye weeks.
Captain Dangerfield. Lock. Next.
Dependles is jet. Was played out of position, injured, etc and was still the second highest scorer for the year.
Dusty will be a POD. Can't see him going backwards but has a lot of little things he can improve on (clangers/frees against) + good bye round. Also I've never not started with Dusty.
The Bont ain't human. Awesome VC choice. Racks up 100+ from 20 touches. Will lead the next gen of SC Studs with Cripps and Treloar.
Fyfe is a monster, had plenty of time to get his leg right. We know he can comfortably average 120+ good C option too playing a lot of Sunday games.
Beams when not broken is a point scoring machine. Suspect due to injury but at 432k I can't say no. Better player than Rockliff and 170k cheaper.
Gawn will break the mold and be back to back #1 scoring ruck.
Confident that Goldy will be #2, paid nearly 700k for him last year. Wasn't 100% last year and was still very serviceable. The only other ruckman I'd consider are Grundy/Sandi.
Love Dahl, dodged a bullet last year when he went down the week before I was gonna trade him in. Safe top 6 fwd imo.
How the hell did Macrae get DPP? I don't know but I'm gonna take it. Can play, pretty consistent scorer. One of the better choices in a very disappointing fwd line.
At 418k Ryder is one of the best picks this year, will piss Lobbe off to the SANFL forever, think he'll be able to notch out a 95+ average and he's got DPP in case Gawn or Goldy go down. My only donut last year came due to Goldy missing. If there's a genuinely good R/F available in future years I will be taking them to avoid that happening again.
Trains are bloody dreadful.
Screenshot_20161215-143046~3.png Screenshot_20161215-143050~2.png
 
Bored shitless on the train so here's another interation, 1.03.
First time i've taken the byes into account.
Chucked in a few more of the higher priced rookies so if we have a shortage come round one I won't have to totally re-structure my team to fit them in.
Docherty is a star will drop in price a bit but Carlton have a nice early draw, willing to pay the price to have him from the get go. 100+ easy.
I've never picked Rance before because KPP are scary. But he has been scoring well the last two years so it seems like a pretty safe pick. Didn't really like any of the defenders priced above him anyways. Edged out Laird due to better bye round, edged out JJ because I already have like 3 dogs.
Backing Hartlett to bounce back, having a genuine ruckman back will help him out. I think having a few Port/GC premos won't hurt too much in round 9 and will be very handy across the other bye weeks.
Captain Dangerfield. Lock. Next.
Dependles is jet. Was played out of position, injured, etc and was still the second highest scorer for the year.
Dusty will be a POD. Can't see him going backwards but has a lot of little things he can improve on (clangers/frees against) + good bye round. Also I've never not started with Dusty.
The Bont ain't human. Awesome VC choice. Racks up 100+ from 20 touches. Will lead the next gen of SC Studs with Cripps and Treloar.
Fyfe is a monster, had plenty of time to get his leg right. We know he can comfortably average 120+ good C option too playing a lot of Sunday games.
Beams when not broken is a point scoring machine. Suspect due to injury but at 432k I can't say no. Better player than Rockliff and 170k cheaper.
Gawn will break the mold and be back to back #1 scoring ruck.
Confident that Goldy will be #2, paid nearly 700k for him last year. Wasn't 100% last year and was still very serviceable. The only other ruckman I'd consider are Grundy/Sandi.
Love Dahl, dodged a bullet last year when he went down the week before I was gonna trade him in. Safe top 6 fwd imo.
How the hell did Macrae get DPP? I don't know but I'm gonna take it. Can play, pretty consistent scorer. One of the better choices in a very disappointing fwd line.
At 418k Ryder is one of the best picks this year, will piss Lobbe off to the SANFL forever, think he'll be able to notch out a 95+ average and he's got DPP in case Gawn or Goldy go down. My only donut last year came due to Goldy missing. If there's a genuinely good R/F available in future years I will be taking them to avoid that happening again.
Trains are bloody dreadful.
View attachment 319715 View attachment 319716
How is Beams a better player than Rocky Beams turns the football more than any of our other midfielders I'm seriously surprised people are picking him
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

How is Beams a better player than Rocky Beams turns the football more than any of our other midfielders I'm seriously surprised people are picking him
113 & 115 avg in recent years is why

Only 432k
 
Danger had 12 scores of 130+ Including 5 over 150. He picks himself.
Plenty of reasoning to not pick Danger. Last year was his best year by a mile, he's nowhere near prime Ablett in the "pick him at any cost" stakes.

Wouldn't surprise me one bit if he's not the top mid. Pendles, Fyfe and Rockliff have shown they can top him.
 
Not sure how I feel about this one, better structure through the byes but not a lot of leeway with rookies which annoys me a little but it's safer with 8 solid captain options.

Sam Docherty [591, 600]
Jason Johannisen [513, 500]
Hamish Hartlett [423, 700]
Michael Hibberd [402, 200]
Andrew McGrath [211, 800]
Jarrod Berry [139, 800]
Tom Stewart [117, 300]
Luke Ryan [117, 300]

Patrick Dangerfield [716, 900]
Scott Pendlebury [645, 700]
Marcus Bontempelli [586, 100]
Nat Fyfe [573, 500]
Tom Mitchell [565, 600]
Sam Powell-Pepper [135, 300]
David Myers [133, 700]
Jack Graham [117, 300]
Zac Fisher [117, 300]
Brandon Parfitt [117, 300]
Kobe Mutch [117, 300]

Max Gawn [645, 000]
Todd Goldstein [588, 400]
Oscar McInerney [102, 400]

Luke Dahlhaus [520, 700]
Jack Macrae [511, 700]
Isaac Heeney [433, 400]
Jarryd Roughead [367, 100]
Aaron Black [137, 100]
Jarrod Pickett [123, 900
Shai Bolton [117, 300]
Brett Eddy [102, 400]

7.4k in the bank
3, 12, 7, 8 through the byes
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Are people only picking Berry for the DEF/MID link? Because he just doesn't get that much ball. I can't see him averaging him very high, so I'll likely pass.
Picking him because his likely to play, he only really needs to average 60s to make enough money for a downgrade option
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Can someone explain why everyone is picking Taylor Adams? He's never played 22 games in a year, his best being 18, the year before last, totals of 15, 16, 12, 18 and 14 for his career. Yes he has averaged 97 in the last 2 seasons which puts him very much in calculations for top defenders but he really doesn't have much durability, it's not like he gets injured in big chucks, he misses games all over the place. Collingwood have an incredibly deep midfield and there was a reason he was pushed back to half back. Last year he opened the season with very solid scoring, played 4 weeks and then missed 2, played the next 3 and missed another 5 (1 being the bye) then got 6 games and missed the final 2.

To put in perspective, if he puts up a 97 average again this season but only plays 18 games, you'll need to fill those games with a rookie, average defensive rookie averages 60 (rough guess), this brings an effective Taylor Adams down to an average of 91. This would make him the 15th highest scoring defender. Basically a base line D6.

The other thing to consider is the depth of midfield scoring at Collingwood. Pendlebury, Treloar, Wells, Sidebottom, Greenwood, Varcoe, Crisp, De Goey and Adams as well, he's probably 5th string in that list. Sydney is probably the best example for best case in Collingwood's and Adam's case. Kennedy, Hannebury, Parker, Mitchell (last year) Jack are their top 5 scoring midfielders. Even the best midfield in the game there is a drop off on the 5th string midfielder. Imo That Sydney group as a collective is much better quality than the Collingwood group.

I just don't understand starting with Adams, he's neither durable or in a scoring position in his teams midfield this year. If he's going well come the byes maybe take a punt on him and bring him in but to me there are much better options here.
 
Can someone explain why everyone is picking Taylor Adams? He's never played 22 games in a year, his best being 18, the year before last, totals of 15, 16, 12, 18 and 14 for his career. Yes he has averaged 97 in the last 2 seasons which puts him very much in calculations for top defenders but he really doesn't have much durability, it's not like he gets injured in big chucks, he misses games all over the place. Collingwood have an incredibly deep midfield and there was a reason he was pushed back to half back. Last year he opened the season with very solid scoring, played 4 weeks and then missed 2, played the next 3 and missed another 5 (1 being the bye) then got 6 games and missed the final 2.

To put in perspective, if he puts up a 97 average again this season but only plays 18 games, you'll need to fill those games with a rookie, average defensive rookie averages 60 (rough guess), this brings an effective Taylor Adams down to an average of 91. This would make him the 15th highest scoring defender. Basically a base line D6.

The other thing to consider is the depth of midfield scoring at Collingwood. Pendlebury, Treloar, Wells, Sidebottom, Greenwood, Varcoe, Crisp, De Goey and Adams as well, he's probably 5th string in that list. Sydney is probably the best example for best case in Collingwood's and Adam's case. Kennedy, Hannebury, Parker, Mitchell (last year) Jack are their top 5 scoring midfielders. Even the best midfield in the game there is a drop off on the 5th string midfielder. Imo That Sydney group as a collective is much better quality than the Collingwood group.

I just don't understand starting with Adams, he's neither durable or in a scoring position in his teams midfield this year. If he's going well come the byes maybe take a punt on him and bring him in but to me there are much better options here.
Flexibility, DPP, saved my arse so many times in leagues last year.
I haven't picked him but will continue to watch him, looks like a good prospect.
 
Flexibility, DPP, saved my arse so many times in leagues last year.
I haven't picked him but will continue to watch him, looks like a good prospect.
He'd have to get through preseason 100% clean bill of health and guys like Langdon would need to get fully fit so he's definitely playing in the midfield before I'd consider him. Well over 15 guys I'd think would average more than a supposed 91 I suggested.
 
N
Bored shitless on the train so here's another interation, 1.03.
First time i've taken the byes into account.
Chucked in a few more of the higher priced rookies so if we have a shortage come round one I won't have to totally re-structure my team to fit them in.
Docherty is a star will drop in price a bit but Carlton have a nice early draw, willing to pay the price to have him from the get go. 100+ easy.
I've never picked Rance before because KPP are scary. But he has been scoring well the last two years so it seems like a pretty safe pick. Didn't really like any of the defenders priced above him anyways. Edged out Laird due to better bye round, edged out JJ because I already have like 3 dogs.
Backing Hartlett to bounce back, having a genuine ruckman back will help him out. I think having a few Port/GC premos won't hurt too much in round 9 and will be very handy across the other bye weeks.
Captain Dangerfield. Lock. Next.
Dependles is jet. Was played out of position, injured, etc and was still the second highest scorer for the year.
Dusty will be a POD. Can't see him going backwards but has a lot of little things he can improve on (clangers/frees against) + good bye round. Also I've never not started with Dusty.
The Bont ain't human. Awesome VC choice. Racks up 100+ from 20 touches. Will lead the next gen of SC Studs with Cripps and Treloar.
Fyfe is a monster, had plenty of time to get his leg right. We know he can comfortably average 120+ good C option too playing a lot of Sunday games.
Beams when not broken is a point scoring machine. Suspect due to injury but at 432k I can't say no. Better player than Rockliff and 170k cheaper.
Gawn will break the mold and be back to back #1 scoring ruck.
Confident that Goldy will be #2, paid nearly 700k for him last year. Wasn't 100% last year and was still very serviceable. The only other ruckman I'd consider are Grundy/Sandi.
Love Dahl, dodged a bullet last year when he went down the week before I was gonna trade him in. Safe top 6 fwd imo.
How the hell did Macrae get DPP? I don't know but I'm gonna take it. Can play, pretty consistent scorer. One of the better choices in a very disappointing fwd line.
At 418k Ryder is one of the best picks this year, will piss Lobbe off to the SANFL forever, think he'll be able to notch out a 95+ average and he's got DPP in case Gawn or Goldy go down. My only donut last year came due to Goldy missing. If there's a genuinely good R/F available in future years I will be taking them to avoid that happening again.
Trains are bloody dreadful.
View attachment 319715 View attachment 319716
Nice team although theres no mid/fwd link.
 
He'd have to get through preseason 100% clean bill of health and guys like Langdon would need to get fully fit so he's definitely playing in the midfield before I'd consider him. Well over 15 guys I'd think would average more than a supposed 91 I suggested.
Adams is one of our better in and under types, he only floats to hb occasionally during games. Hes a bull!

I agree though it's just a matter of if he can play 22 games, last year he was injured/suspended.

Year before he got suspended heaps.

Year before that he couldn't get a game as It was his first season at the pies.

Hes in the leadership group now, get the feeling he's in for a big year!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top