Remove this Banner Ad

The Academies - 2016

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Common mate . Sport is about having the best players first and foremost . What players does your club not have access to from a draft perspective ? 0 . My beef is not with your club at this stage but it will be in 5 season s time if this shite continues .

If we use your argument all the Victorian clubs should have first crack at the Victorian kids ....
Hey im just clarifying about the fairness off the comp.

Do i think the rules could be a bit better? Yep. But the academies are needed up north for the inherent disadvabtages they have

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
 
Common mate . Sport is about having the best players first and foremost . What players does your club not have access to from a draft perspective ? 0 . My beef is not with your club at this stage but it will be in 5 season s time if this shite continues .

If we use your argument all the Victorian clubs should have first crack at the Victorian kids ....

So we should just ignore all the advantages that the vic clubs get? and any advantages the frontier clubs get should be taken away from them because its not fair, as the AFL should be a "level playing field".

I hope one day the Vic clubs will wake up to how many inherent advantages they have, but i wont be holding my breath.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

A
Hey im just clarifying about the fairness off the comp.

Do i think the rules could be a bit better? Yep. But the academies are needed up north for the inherent disadvabtages they have

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
I m glad there is GWS supporters out
So we should just ignore all the advantages that the vic clubs get? and any advantages the frontier clubs get should be taken away from them because its not fair, as the AFL should be a "level playing field".

I hope one day the Vic clubs will wake up to how many inherent advantages they have, but i wont be holding my breath.
so you believe your club deserves a priority pick as well as first crack at your academy kids ? A mere 12 years since a 3 peat ?
 
A

I m glad there is GWS supporters out

so you believe your club deserves a priority pick as well as first crack at your academy kids ? A mere 12 years since a 3 peat ?
So taking pot shots without discussing interesting.

It's an equalisation measure not a benefit.

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
 
You know well and good home ground advantage means stuff all compared to the quality of player your club has on its list .

So your saying you would prefer less flying over quality kids ?
 
so you believe your club deserves a priority pick as well as first crack at your academy kids ? A mere 12 years since a 3 peat ?

Have a look how long it was between other clubs getting assistance and their last premierships prior to that. Twelve years isn't "mere".
 
talk to St Kilda and the Dogs. it's mere.

I like how you choose to ignore assistance rendered to teams like Hawthorn or Carlton or Collingwood. I'm sure you and the other poster were claiming they were "merely" X years removed from premierships at the time too because of the Saints, Dogs and Melbourne, right?
 
A

so you believe your club deserves a priority pick as well as first crack at your academy kids ? A mere 12 years since a 3 peat ?

Don't think i mentioned a PP. Just saying that insinuating that the academies is a big injustice to the integrity of the competition is laughable.
 
Don't think i mentioned a PP. Just saying that insinuating that the academies is a big injustice to the integrity of the competition is laughable.

an additional round 1 selection every year or better , the academies are worth that much and have totally wreck3ed any fairness in the draft.
Of course the effects won't be readily apparent for 3-4 years as the batch of players being drafted now comes through.
 
Get around the spell checkers . Correct grammar is everything when it comes to common sense without it the world would cease to exist .
 

Remove this Banner Ad

an additional round 1 selection every year or better , the academies are worth that much and have totally wreck3ed any fairness in the draft.
Of course the effects won't be readily apparent for 3-4 years as the batch of players being drafted now comes through.

You are right we should have just tanked and got our PPs like the other Vic teams and then we would be playing finals in no time
 
Get around the spell checkers . Correct grammar is everything when it comes to common sense, without it the world would cease to exist .

Fixed it for you
 
I like how you choose to ignore assistance rendered to teams like Hawthorn or Carlton or Collingwood. I'm sure you and the other poster were claiming they were "merely" X years removed from premierships at the time too because of the Saints, Dogs and Melbourne, right?

Confirmation bias at its best right there
 
There is a lot of baseless dribble in this thread. The change the AFL made yesterday was substantial in terms of watering down any excess benefit from the academies.
 
You know well and good home ground advantage means stuff all compared to the quality of player your club has on its list .

So your saying you would prefer less flying over quality kids ?
A benefit is a benefit.


Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

an additional round 1 selection every year or better , the academies are worth that much and have totally wreck3ed any fairness in the draft.
Of course the effects won't be readily apparent for 3-4 years as the batch of players being drafted now comes through.
Yeah not like f/s, tanking or priority picks hadnt already done that.

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
 
Yeah not like f/s, tanking or priority picks hadnt already done that.

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk

Just no sense of scale of proportion, magnitude, the priority picks and father son have had pretty minimal impact, most clubs maybe getting a decent father son every 10 years . The Academy is producing the same amount off talent for GWS THIS YEAR as father sons and priority picks have produced in 20 years for any club. The Acamdenics are at least 10 times and more like 20 times the impact.

this constant bringing up of very very very small apples versus the massive runaway train the academies are. seesh how about a little realism and honesty.

the father sons and priority picks are equal for all clubs. they do not favour particular clubs,. While the start up clubs doit really get a chance early the start up concessions cover that. And while some clubs did get screwed on the start up concessions, like Brisbane, Brisbane got a very generous zone selection system which delivered a large slice of talent that basically built their 3 peat. There was no particular inequity in the father/son or priority systems available to all clubs on an equal basis. So there is no need what so ever to 'compensate' the northern clubs for this.
 
Just no sense of scale of proportion, magnitude, the priority picks and father son have had pretty minimal impact, most clubs maybe getting a decent father son every 10 years . The Academy is producing the same amount off talent for GWS THIS YEAR as father sons and priority picks have produced in 20 years for any club. The Acamdenics are at least 10 times and more like 20 times the impact.

this constant bringing up of very very very small apples versus the massive runaway train the academies are. seesh how about a little realism and honesty.

Interesting that benefits for the victorian clubs are very small in your mind.
Maybe but theres plenty of them.

While any equalisation measures for the north mean the death of the sport.

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
 
Interesting that benefits for the victorian clubs are very small in your mind.
Maybe but theres plenty of them.

While any equalisation measures for the north mean the death of the sport.

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk

what advantages do the victorian clubs have the require equalisation?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom