Mega Thread The Flat Earth Mega thread.

[cannot]

Because that's the facts.
Your theories are that of a madman.
It makes people pushing that flat earth theory look sensible.

 

[Watchyourwaite]

programmer / god ... looking forward to your technique for 'debunking' Dr. James Gates Jr., error correcting codes, supersymmetry research. i assume it involes the words "moron" and "troll" repetitively



you should not trust the jesuits for they are bad dudes

Ok. I need to debunk this dude, while you debunk the big bang theory by calling him a jesuit. Logical.

Hit me up with some of this fool proof coding evidence! Lemme have a look.

 

[cannot]

Ok. I need to debunk this dude, while you debunk the big bang theory by calling him a jesuit. Logical.

Hit me up with some of this fool proof coding evidence! Lemme have a look.

get this guy to help you -->

It can't be

 

[Watchyourwaite]

We are inside a simulation being projected to the creators of the simulation.
How can the universe be created out of nothing,sounds like magic or something,first there was nothing,then there was an entire universe,expanding into what we don't know does or doesn't exist.This doesn't seem possible in a physical universe.
In a simulated universe,this is entirely possible,you create the programme and then load it up,and you have your Big Bang and the universe is created at the point the simulation is turned on.

Well, that's where quantum fluctuations come in. Have you read anything on quantum mechanics? Weren't you talking about qm before?

Where did the people who created the simulation come from?

 

[cannot]

Where did the people who created the simulation come from?

you like the big questions dont you

Yeap,I'm interested in the theory of simulation because I think it would be a great way to troll people

reported

 

[Watchyourwaite]

get this guy to help you -->

But you said you were looking forward to it.

Do you not have any?
Do i have to look for something, hope it's what you mean, and then try to debunk it? Sounds like a waste of time.

 

[Watchyourwaite]

you like the big questions dont you

Strange statement.

 

[cannot]

listen to how triggered you are, keep the ad hominems out of my thread. have you ever seen any of this "so much proof"?

"millions and millions of proofs"

 

[darthbards]

You're passing off research in to a hypothesis in its very early stage as fact here. Physicists have only just started researching it and you're effectively saying it's real.

You've obviously done a decent amount of research in to the hypothesis but at this stage it is just that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Totally agree,it is a just a theory at this point. I'm also suggesting the universe we think we know now is largely theory and hypothesis,just far more advanced. Maybe we have been researching and experimenting in the wrong areas and are completely wrong.
Maybe there is no dark matter for example,we are just assuming it's there to help us with some of our theories. Maybe there is lots of nothing in our universe to save processing room inside the simulation. Maybe there is nothing inside a graviton to also save on processing power,maybe there are no gravitons at all. How empty is an atom? This again could have been a very clever way of saving processing power inside the simulation.
Happy for people to believe whatever they want of course,not so pleased when people call others morons and such just because they believe the earth is round and that's it,end of their unproven story.

 

[darthbards]

Ok. I need to debunk this dude, while you debunk the big bang theory by calling him a jesuit. Logical.

Hit me up with some of this fool proof coding evidence! Lemme have a look.

Why do you need to debunk the theory. I'm sure mankind is intelligent enough to simultaneously study more than one theory to answer important questions about our universe.
You seem scared that everything isn't exactly as you have been told to believe it is,don't be,history is littered with people believing false information,things changed and everybody survived perfectly fine.
No,there is no fool proof evidence of James Gates computer code yet,just as there are no fool proof answers to the questions I have asked you previously about some more popular theories.

 

[Watchyourwaite]

Why do you need to debunk the theory. I'm sure mankind is intelligent enough to simultaneously study more than one theory to answer important questions about our universe.
You seem scared that everything isn't exactly as you have been told to believe it is,don't be,history is littered with people believing false information,things changed and everybody survived perfectly fine.
No,there is no fool proof evidence of James Gates computer code yet,just as there are no fool proof answers to the questions I have asked you previously about some more popular theories.

Because cannot wanted me to try and said he couldnt wait to see it.

Its shit like this that makes me ask if your trolling.

Here is the post that i replied to, that you had to have seen when you were clicking reply to my post.

looking forward to your technique for 'debunking' Dr. James Gates Jr., error correcting codes, supersymmetry research. i assume it involes the words "moron" and "troll" repetitively [snipped]

Why didnt you answer my simple question of who is running and who created the simulation?

 

[darthbards]

Well, that's where quantum fluctuations come in. Have you read anything on quantum mechanics? Weren't you talking about qm before?

Where did the people who created the simulation come from?

Finding out who created the simulation may be beyond us but who knows. We would certainly be able to prove its real or create our own without neccasarily discovering who created it originally.Going by some of the logic here it is probably God because we have been studying religion far longer than we have simulation,big bang,parallel universes or beings we are yet to know anything about.

I know a little about quantum machanics,enough to know the theory that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light theory has now been 'debunked',as you like to say. Interesting that atoms have the ability to transfer information instaltaniosly,sounds a little bit like what might happen inside a computer,or a computer simulation.

 

[Watchyourwaite]

Finding out who created the simulation may be beyond us but who knows. We would certainly be able to prove its real or create our own without neccasarily discovering who created it originally.Going by some of the logic here it is probably God because we have been studying religion far longer than we have simulation,big bang,parallel universes or beings we are yet to know anything about.

So, you dont think the big bang is possible (and you dont understand the quantum fluctuation theory), because you dont think something can come from nothing, and you think the universe isnt infinite and that it must be expanding into something, which also somehow gives support to the theory that the universe is a simulation.
BUT.
You dont hold your 2d 3d projection stuff to the same level. You just accept that it is, and that we cant ever know for real.

I know a little about quantum machanics,enough to know the theory that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light theory has now been 'debunked',as you like to say. Interesting that atoms have the ability to transfer information instaltaniosly,sounds a little bit like what might happen inside a computer,or a computer simulation.

Neutrinos? If thats what your talking about, you'll find that it was faulty equipment.
So, i hope you know more about quantum mechanics than that e=mc^2 has been debunked.

 

[cannot]

Because cannot * * wanted me to try and said he couldnt wait to see it.
* Its shit like this that makes me ask if your trolling.
* Here is the post that i replied to, that you had to have seen when you were clicking reply to my post.
* Why didnt you answer my simple question of who is running and who created the simulation?

lolz

 

[Watchyourwaite]

lolz

Its someone or no one. Pretty simple.

If its no one, then he accepts that its possible for something to come from nothing. If its someone, then I ask where that person came from, until we get to the same point of something coming from nothing.

Does that confuse you?

 

[cannot]

Its someone or no one. Pretty simple.

If its no one, then he accepts that its possible for something to come from nothing. If its someone, then I ask where that person came from, until we get to the same point of something coming from nothing.

Does that confuse you?

questions like "where is the edge of the universe" and "is the world is a simulation who made the simulation" do confuse me yes.

im dumb, or they are mind boggling type question of probable a bit of both

the question is simple but is the answer?

like #darthbards has been saying there is a lot about the world/universe we dont know about and some things we only learned quite recently. We often find out we were completely wrong in regards to things we "know" as well, like your apparent above example

 

[Watchyourwaite]

questions like "where is the edge of the universe" and "is the world is a simulation who made the simulation" do confuse me yes.

im dumb, or they are mind boggling type question of probable a bit of both

the question is simple but is the answer?

No, the answer isnt simple. I didnt say it was.
Any question can be mind boggling if you apply enough time and thought to it.

 

[cannot]

http://worldwide.chat/This_is_Real_Proof_Shocking_Footage_of_Flat_Earth/Ph6_4mbxgDg.video

 

[Watchyourwaite]

http://worldwide.chat/This_is_Real_Proof_Shocking_Footage_of_Flat_Earth/Ph6_4mbxgDg.video

Holiday snapshots?
I like your costume! Looks like that guy from the batman movie.

 

[darthbards]

So, you dont think the big bang is possible (and you dont understand the quantum fluctuation theory), because you dont think something can come from nothing, and you think the universe isnt infinite and that it must be expanding into something, which also somehow gives support to the theory that the universe is a simulation.
BUT.
You dont hold your 2d 3d projection stuff to the same level. You just accept that it is, and that we cant ever know for real.


Neutrinos? If thats what your talking about, you'll find that it was faulty equipment.
So, i hope you know more about quantum mechanics than that e=mc^2 has been debunked.

I'm not saying it's not possible that we live in a physical universe,I'm pointing out their are still some major questions still to be proven that we in fact are. The difference is I'm not calling people trolls or morons like the round earth crowd, I'm just putting forward discussion as to how or why the earth could possibly be flat,inside a simulation.
I was talking about entanglement. Do you think entanglement puts forward a case that simulation theory is indeed possible?
You seem extremely defensive about your unproven,spinning,ever expanding universe with its round earth.

 

[Watchyourwaite]

I'm not saying it's not possible that we live in a physical universe,I'm pointing out their are still some major questions still to be proven that we in fact are. The difference is I'm not calling people trolls or morons like the round earth crowd, I'm just putting forward discussion as to how or why the earth could possibly be flat,inside a simulation.
I was talking about entanglement. Do you think entanglement puts forward a case that simulation theory is indeed possible?
You seem extremely defensive about your unproven,spinning,ever expanding universe with its round earth.

I didnt call you a troll because of your theory. I called you it because you had trouble following a simple conversation with analogies in it.
You either couldnt follow it because you are not very intelligent, or because you are trolling.

Im offensive, not defensive.
You cant complain that im being offensive and then say you think im being defensive.

Whats entanglement? The name alone isnt familiar.
Gonna have to love you and leave you soon. NYE and all that jazz.

 

[kane249]

http://worldwide.chat/This_is_Real_Proof_Shocking_Footage_of_Flat_Earth/Ph6_4mbxgDg.video

Simple test, go down to your local port / harbour and watch a ship sail out to sea.

Does it disappear over the horizon or are you able to watch it constantly?

 

[Watchyourwaite]

Simple test, go down to your local port / harbour and watch a ship sail out to sea.

Does it disappear over the horizon or are you able to watch it constantly?

Nah, eyesight failing isnt good evidence against a flat earth.

 

[darthbards]

o

listen to how triggered you are, keep the ad hominems out of my thread. have you ever seen any of this "so much proof"?

I find it amazing some of these people happily questioning the intelligence of others and branding them with the term moron seem to think there is a set number of these people in existence and they are somehow excluded from such things by simply labelling someone else with such narrow minded terminology.

Cool thread by the way and yes,flat earth does seem to be popping up a lot more like your OP suggested.
With so much still unknown with the current theories that have been put forward and taught since the beginning of the last century,I think more and more alternate theories may be discussed until we start having a far better understanding of what is really going on.

 

[Alfred_]

Flat earth.

****me I've read it all now.