Mega Thread The Flat Earth Mega thread.

[Present Not Past]

I've seen them with my naked eye on numerous occasions

So have I, for years. You should get out of your house and watch the night sky sometime. There are marvelous things to view up there GG.

 

[NEGAN]

Yeah the whole flattening out like pizza dough due to spin....is actual insanity. And he's ant-FE. He's on the side of Total Power and all those guys on here. That's worse than having Eric Dubay on the FE side.

More the fact that he referenced pizza dough which actually ends up flat and not pear shaped.

 

[exe ex machina]

More the fact that he referenced pizza dough which actually ends up flat and not pear shaped.

It's a heckin'g madhouse out there in the scientific world.

 

[darthbards]

Well the way he slaughters flat earth thinking and then proceeds with this thought it's so I don't even know the word for it...



It's a wonder why anyone has so much faith in science.

Granted he says he says it was taken out of context after the fact. I saw with my own eyes him say that because the earth spins so fast and then reference pizza dough I just was in awe at the peoples silence.

People who follow the old fraudulent science should actually stand up and say that dropkicks like De Grasse are exactly that.
There's actually some great scientific minds like Susskind and Campbell to name two, but we have this bonehead playing pop star bumbling around and basically embarrassing himself half the time he opens his mouth,he makes me cringe.
How he got chosen as one of the high priests in old sciences religious type direction I have no idea.

 

[Duritz]

"lol your pictures are fake because we know the ISS is fake because there's a thread on here about it."

Darthbards is the best ever.

 

[Nothing]

Could one of the FEers please concisely post the relevant information about flat earth.

• Is there an icewall? If so, how high is it?
• Please post the accepted version of the map of FE.
• Is there a firmament? If so, what happens to Elon Musk's rockets?
• Please use maths to explain UA (or whatever the preferred force that keeps objects returning to earth).
• The moon and the sun are 3100km away and the same size. True or False? If true, how do solar and lunar eclipses work?
• Every manmade object ever sent into space is a lie. If there are any that are true, how did they get there?
• I get that "they" are keeping us from the truth. But who are they? How have they got so many people involved and yet none of those people have broken ranks?
• Why are all videos confirming a flat earth denied as fake, yet we should believe all videos posted by FEers?
• What is the maths of a flat earth? Surface area, radius of the flat earth, distance from Sydney to Tokyo, Sydney to Santiago in Chile and Santiago to Tokyo.
• What evidence would you require to convince you that indeed the earth is roughly spherical?

No youtube videos I don't have the bandwidth.

 

[NEGAN]

Right now it's crazy,

Because of this topic I have learnt so much more than I would have believing what I was taught ....told...

My thoughts right now about this is utter confusion.

I didn't believe in flat earth before because I thought it was just plain wrong. Bit now,
I don't believe in flat Earth because there is not a complete model of everything working but in time and with research the answers may come.

The global model which I fully trusted about a few months has become filled with doubts.

Also because of this topic I have found out a few home truths about Einstein.

I recommend anyone remotely entertaining this notion of flat earth start with researching Einstein to the fullest (leave no stone unturned) and then research Tesla. Just a recommendation though and only if you are truly interested in this topic then come back and ask flat earth questions it will give a better understanding of their point of view. Instead of coming in here loaded with "lol icewall".

Flat earth maybe wrong but man is it eye opening.

 

[exe ex machina]

Right now it's crazy,

Because of this topic I have learnt so much more than I would have believing what I was taught ....told...

My thoughts right now about this is utter confusion.

I didn't believe in flat earth before because I thought it was just plain wrong. Bit now,
I don't believe in flat Earth because there is not a complete model of everything working but in time and with research the answers may come.

The global model which I fully trusted about a few months has become filled with doubts.

Also because of this topic I have found out a few home truths about Einstein.

I recommend anyone remotely entertaining this notion of flat earth start with researching Einstein to the fullest (leave no stone unturned) and then research Tesla. Just a recommendation though and only if you are truly interested in this topic then come back and ask flat earth questions it will give a better understanding of their point of view. Instead of coming in here loaded with "lol icewall".

Flat earth maybe wrong but man is it eye opening.

Congratulations, on your journey. You have taken a small but giant step toward FE embracement. I dedicate this to you....

 

[darthbards]

Could one of the FEers please concisely post the relevant information about flat earth.

• Is there an icewall? If so, how high is it?
• Please post the accepted version of the map of FE.
• Is there a firmament? If so, what happens to Elon Musk's rockets?
• Please use maths to explain UA (or whatever the preferred force that keeps objects returning to earth).
• The moon and the sun are 3100km away and the same size. True or False? If true, how do solar and lunar eclipses work?
• Every manmade object ever sent into space is a lie. If there are any that are true, how did they get there?
• I get that "they" are keeping us from the truth. But who are they? How have they got so many people involved and yet none of those people have broken ranks?
• Why are all videos confirming a flat earth denied as fake, yet we should believe all videos posted by FEers?
• What is the maths of a flat earth? Surface area, radius of the flat earth, distance from Sydney to Tokyo, Sydney to Santiago in Chile and Santiago to Tokyo.
• What evidence would you require to convince you that indeed the earth is roughly spherical?

No youtube videos I don't have the bandwidth.

How dare you once again raise point five as a question
Not only was this discussed at some length only a matter of pages ago,but I opened my heart and explained how the shadow object is my favorite scientific thing. I expressed how I wished to call my next child Shadow and sent out an invitation to other flat earthers to come and discuss the shadow object with me.

You have no interest in flat earth and your just asking baby questions easily answered in the FAQ section of the website. Your trying to be a smarty pants. Why don't you piss off back to the science board or something mate. Plenty of ball lovers over there you can chat with,I've had a gob full of you blokes constantly bringing your ball love over here and shoving it down people's throats.
If you cannot show respect for the shadow object you are not welcome for scientific discussion here.

 

[darthbards]

Right now it's crazy,

Because of this topic I have learnt so much more than I would have believing what I was taught ....told...

My thoughts right now about this is utter confusion.

I didn't believe in flat earth before because I thought it was just plain wrong. Bit now,
I don't believe in flat Earth because there is not a complete model of everything working but in time and with research the answers may come.

The global model which I fully trusted about a few months has become filled with doubts.

Also because of this topic I have found out a few home truths about Einstein.

I recommend anyone remotely entertaining this notion of flat earth start with researching Einstein to the fullest (leave no stone unturned) and then research Tesla. Just a recommendation though and only if you are truly interested in this topic then come back and ask flat earth questions it will give a better understanding of their point of view. Instead of coming in here loaded with "lol icewall".

Flat earth maybe wrong but man is it eye opening.

Cool post NEGAN.
I think when the thread was started posts like yours were what was eventually wanted and the threads intention,to have interesting discussion. Unfortunately some of the more fanatical people from the religion of science have tried to derail or put a roadblock on such discussions.

Both round and flat theory have some major flaws,even if the flat theory seems far more plausible. I often wonder if human perception is playing a greater part than we realise,maybe there is something in between we don't know,or can't perceive and our planet is both round and flat in some way. There is certainly no way,with such little knowledge of our planet,we have the knowledge of outer space that the old fraudulent science is trying to make out as some kind of distraction.

Einstein's theories and the man himself are certainly worth taking a close look at. His theories don't seem to add up at all and there is a lot of made up elements and assumptions that lead to his final results. I'm unsure how he became a high priest when old science took on its religion form we know today,but how or why he did could unlock the mystery of many of the lies we have been told.

 

[NEGAN]

Cool post NEGAN.
I think when the thread was started posts like yours were what was eventually wanted and the threads intention,to have interesting discussion. Unfortunately some of the more fanatical people from the religion of science have tried to derail or put a roadblock on such discussions.

Both round and flat theory have some major flaws,even if the flat theory seems far more plausible. I often wonder if human perception is playing a greater part than we realise,maybe there is something in between we don't know,or can't perceive and our planet is both round and flat in some way. There is certainly no way,with such little knowledge of our planet,we have the knowledge of outer space that the old fraudulent science is trying to make out as some kind of distraction.

Einstein's theories and the man himself are certainly worth taking a close look at. His theories don't seem to add up at all and there is a lot of made up elements and assumptions that lead to his final results. I'm unsure how he became a high priest when old science took on its religion form we know today,but how or why he did could unlock the mystery of many of the lies we have been told.

I think, with topics like this when trying to explain to a non believer is you can't start off straight with telling them the Earth is flat, remember you are trying to promote a notion that is directly against what they have been taught ingrained with since day 1 at school and known their whole life. Telling them the Earth is flat should be step 6 not step 1.

But I agree people who are genuinely interested in this topic should question and research what they have been taught before coming in.

 

[darthbards]

I think, with topics like this when trying to explain to a non believer is you can't start off straight with telling them the Earth is flat, remember you are trying to promote a notion that is directly against what they have been taught ingrained with since day 1 at school and known their whole life. Telling them the Earth is flat should be step 6 not step 1.

But I agree people who are genuinely interested in this topic should question and research what they have been taught before coming in.

Yeah agree and we do try and be patient until it's obvious the person asking the question is just here for his own ego kick.
I can also understand someone asking a question that was already answered on say page 60 for example,you can't expect someone new to read the whole thread,but asking a question that was only answered two days ago leaves me suspicious that person isn't genuinely interested in FE.

 

[Nothing]

How dare you once again raise point five as a question
Not only was this discussed at some length only a matter of pages ago,but I opened my heart and explained how the shadow object is my favorite scientific thing. I expressed how I wished to call my next child Shadow and sent out an invitation to other flat earthers to come and discuss the shadow object with me.

You have no interest in flat earth and your just asking baby questions easily answered in the FAQ section of the website. Your trying to be a smarty pants. Why don't you piss off back to the science board or something mate. Plenty of ball lovers over there you can chat with,I've had a gob full of you blokes constantly bringing your ball love over here and shoving it down people's throats.
If you cannot show respect for the shadow object you are not welcome for scientific discussion here.

OK. So rather than answer the questions you have chosen to deflect. I want the science of flat earth and the generally accepted view from FEers. From your overzealous response, I take it that the shadow object is the accepted scientific reason for eclipses. Thank you. Now if you could address the other answers, without further deflection that would be ideal.

One further question though, does the shadow object exist within the firmament?
How high does the firmament go? I assume 3100km.

I want your answers (or GGs or Negans), I don't want references to other websites. I want your convincing reasons for flat earth. Your love of the shadow object is the first believe to answer a question(though there is no science to it, I'll get to that later).

I'm a student of life and happy to learn. But what I get taught needs to make sense with maths (the numbers never lie).

 

[exe ex machina]

I AM THE TEACHER

 

[darthbards]

OK. So rather than answer the questions you have chosen to deflect. I want the science of flat earth and the generally accepted view from FEers. From your overzealous response, I take it that the shadow object is the accepted scientific reason for eclipses. Thank you. Now if you could address the other answers, without further deflection that would be ideal.

One further question though, does the shadow object exist within the firmament?
How high does the firmament go? I assume 3100km.

I want your answers (or GGs or Negans), I don't want references to other websites. I want your convincing reasons for flat earth. Your love of the shadow object is the first believe to answer a question(though there is no science to it, I'll get to that later).

I'm a student of life and happy to learn. But what I get taught needs to make sense with maths (the numbers never lie).

Thanks tants,I wasn't trying to deflect,as you could imagine and maybe read,some people do tend to come along and try and put a roadblock on discussion through being mischievous. There are currently 3 threads discussing FE ,so I'm sure we can all choose the one that suits us and be polite.
The thread on the science board where they are discussing this topic is titled 'Science under attack',but I'm more than happy to answer your questions if you post happily like your follow up post,again I thank you for that.

You have a lot of questions,so please be patient as I answer a couple at a time while I find time through the day.

Firstly on the Lunar eclipse,obviously my favourite as it features the shadow object.
A lunar eclipse occurs when the shadow object passes between the sun and moon.The point where the moon passes in front of the sun's orbital plane is called the Node.
The shadow object is estimated to be around 8 miles in diameter,it's orbital plane is tilted at an angle 5`10' to the sun's orbital plane. The shadow object is never seen as its orbit is so close to Sun. This is obviously acceptable as the sun's vertical rays are so strong. The sun's strong rays block out nearly every celestial body orbiting the earth during the day.

 

[NEGAN]

OK. So rather than answer the questions you have chosen to deflect. I want the science of flat earth and the generally accepted view from FEers. From your overzealous response, I take it that the shadow object is the accepted scientific reason for eclipses. Thank you. Now if you could address the other answers, without further deflection that would be ideal.

One further question though, does the shadow object exist within the firmament?
How high does the firmament go? I assume 3100km.

I want your answers (or GGs or Negans), I don't want references to other websites. I want your convincing reasons for flat earth. Your love of the shadow object is the first believe to answer a question(though there is no science to it, I'll get to that later).

I'm a student of life and happy to learn. But what I get taught needs to make sense with maths (the numbers never lie).

Sorry buddy I would love to answer your questions but I am not a flat Earther.

But if I had a label it would be a "round Earth questioner."

darthbards and GG.exe are your guys, just treat the topic with respect and you may get your questions answered.

 

[darthbards]

I AM THE TEACHER

You can post videos that back up my scientific observations as I post them if you want GG.

 

[Nothing]

Thanks tants,I wasn't trying to deflect,as you could imagine and maybe read,some people do tend to come along and try and put a roadblock on discussion through being mischievous. There are currently 3 threads discussing FE ,so I'm sure we can all choose the one that suits us and be polite.
The thread on the science board where they are discussing this topic is titled 'Science under attack',but I'm more than happy to answer your questions if you post happily like your follow up post,again I thank you for that.

You have a lot of questions,so please be patient as I answer a couple at a time while I find time through the day.

Firstly on the Lunar eclipse,obviously my favourite as it features the shadow object.
A lunar eclipse occurs when the shadow object passes between the sun and moon.The point where the moon passes in front of the sun's orbital plane is called the Node.
The shadow object is estimated to be around 8 miles in diameter,it's orbital plane is tilted at an angle 5`10' to the sun's orbital plane. The shadow object is never seen as its orbit is so close to Sun. This is obviously acceptable as the sun's vertical rays are so strong. The sun's strong rays block out nearly every celestial body orbiting the earth during the day.

Thanks. Take your time. Keep it up.

Shadow object for eclipses. Check. For clarification, it orbits the sun or it's orbit is close to the sun? Ie orbiting earth but in the same orbit as the sun?

 

[darthbards]

Thanks. Take your time. Keep it up.

Shadow object for eclipses. Check. For clarification, it orbits the sun or it's orbit is close to the sun? Ie orbiting earth but in the same orbit as the sun?

That is an acceptable question. More research is needed in regards to the shadow object obviously. Please understand old fraudulent science has many unanswered questions also like dark matter,dark energy and gravity. My wish is that after the management of LIGO face criminal charges and are jailed their facilities are handed over to the FE Society as well as there funding....but back to your question.
At this point it is believed the shadow object orbits the earth along with the sun. Some of scientific colleague's believe the Shadow object may orbit the sun but more research is required to track the positions of Mercury,Venus and the sun's asteroid satellites and do the relevant equations before any conclusions can be drawn.

 

[darthbards]

Sorry buddy I would love to answer your questions but I am not a flat Earther.

But if I had a label it would be a "round Earth questioner."

darthbards and GG.exe are your guys, just treat the topic with respect and you may get your questions answered.

It also needs to be pointed out our scientific colleague cannot is also a brilliant mind who is very good at answering some of these questions. As he's currently on holiday I'm more than happy to fly solo with GG until his return.

 

[darthbards]

Elon Musks rockets are a hoax. When you see them take off you will notice they go up then tail off as to not hit the firmament. Musk uses his Mars hoax so he can quietly go about his real research that we are actually living in a simulation,I support this theory and agree with his mathematical conclusions that there is a one in a billion chance we are not living in a simulation.

Humans have never gotten outside low orbit or penetrated the firmament. Proof of this can be found on multiple threads right here such as 'moon landing hoax' and 'mars rover hoax',there is also a thread regarding Neil Armstrong.
We have no idea why the flat earth is being kept from us. I suspect it's because old fraudulent science looks upon itself as a major religion and has tried to discredit the religion of faith.
Right through history we were taught the earth is flat and told about things like the firmament. People knew the world was flat for centuries.
There are no satellites in upper orbit and again you will find proof on the thread 'satellites are a hoax',there is also no ISS as there is a thread titled 'ISS is a hoax'.
There are multiple videos available on you tube that have been shown here of people flying rockets directly into the firmament. These are just everyday people with no need to lie.
In low orbit there are objects called stratolites that have been put there to fool us.

 

[Nothing]

How does orbiting work?

 

[darthbards]

How does orbiting work?

The stratolites?

 

[Nothing]

The stratolites?

No.

At this point it is believed the shadow object orbits the earth along with the sun. Some of scientific colleague's believe the Shadow object may orbit the sun but more research is required to track the positions of Mercury,Venus and the sun's asteroid satellites and do the relevant equations before any conclusions can be drawn.

The shadow object orbits the earth (or sun). How do orbits work in this context?

 

[darthbards]

The shadow object is in the same situation as the sun.
The sun,moon,shadow object and stars are caught in a celestial system of multiplicity.
They rotate around the northern hub with its central point being the north pole..