Punctured lung for kersten???
I'll melt to that (if that's what it is)
Back to Tabs it is then
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Punctured lung for kersten???
I'll melt to that (if that's what it is)
He's probably ok. Coughing up lots of blood though. Preparing to melt just in caseBack to Tabs it is then
seriously? im not watching it, he better not be ******* injuredPunctured lung for kersten???
I'll melt to that (if that's what it is)
Back to Tabs it is then
Apeness first!
Yes but only for temperature reasons this time.Are we melting today?
I see them as very different. Ape would replace Griff or Sandi from today's game IMO, not Kerstin. We'd be way too top heavy with Ape, Griff, Sandi and Darcy all in the same team
For mine Apeness although big is a better "smaller" player than Taberner. He brings tackling pressure that Taberner doesn't. He is also a more reliable mark. Apeness is also in more form.
Not a fan of Tab , but I think Tab is a proper replacement for kersten. when tab is confident he mark everything , I honestly don't think last week problem is Tab but midfield intensity.For mine Apeness although big is a better "smaller" player than Taberner. He brings tackling pressure that Taberner doesn't. He is also a more reliable mark. Apeness is also in more form.
Agreed that Griffin, Darcy, Apeness is too many talls in a real game, but so it is the same with Taberner for Apeness. Once we get to the seaspn proper Darcy and Griffin go to Peel.
Are we melting today?
Are we melting today?
Because you use high picks on the guys you think have the greatest potential, not on who you think is most ready-made. This is especially true of a rebuilding side. Not a hard concept to grasp surelyI'll get it going.
Why the **** did we spend our earliest draft pick in years on a bloke the coach doesn't even think can play footy yet?
The comments from Lyon in that article really ground my gears.
Should've gone for Tim English then?Because you use high picks on the guys you think have the greatest potential, not on who you think is most ready-made. This is especially true of a rebuilding side. Not a hard concept to grasp surely
Should've gone for Tim English then?
I'll get it going.
Why the **** did we spend our earliest draft pick in years on a bloke the coach doesn't even think can play footy yet?
The comments from Lyon in that article really ground my gears.
What do rebuilding sides typically do? Tweak the existing game plan with 25-30 year olds including the likes of Nick Suban? OR do they inject what youth they have to see who has what it takes and hope they learn something even if they fail?Maybe they think Logue will be better?
What do we lose by playing our round 1 draft pick in a preseason game (apart from an invaluable learning experience for the player)?Who gives a s**t if he isn't playing now. He'll most likely have a 10+ year career with us if he is half as good as we hope, so if Ross doesn't think he is ready then who are we to argue.
Recruiter for St Kilda rated English at 1 for the draft. Let's hope Logue can learn to play footy, and fast!My mate who played for east Freo, and is still involved with them, doesn't rate logue that highly, reckons we should have got English, really hope he is wrong.
Recruiter for St Kilda rated English at 1 for the draft. Let's hope Logue can learn to play footy, and fast!
Yeah, Brodie looks like becoming an absolute gun. If only we could draft them all.I really wanted Will Brodie.
Will back in our recruiters though, they've done well recently.
A Pearce, Weller, Blakely, Langdon, Tucker all look the goods from the previous 3 drafts. Apeness and Balic to be determined.