- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #7,826
Not yet, is it good?Anybody watched The Undoing?
Im going through the man in the high castle atm and its pretty good.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not yet, is it good?Anybody watched The Undoing?
Anti-intellectualism is getting more and more prominent.
Just chucked the first episode on, but yes, really enjoying it.Not yet, is it good?
Im going through the man in the high castle atm and its pretty good.
Just chucked the first episode on, but yes, really enjoying it.
Hugh Grant is great. Well written and very intriguing etc.
I got a bit through season 2 and gave up. It was so slow. Does it get better?Not yet, is it good?
Im going through the man in the high castle atm and its pretty good.
Yeah, it kind of turns sci-fi.I got a bit through season 2 and gave up. It was so slow. Does it get better?
Yeah I think I just about got to there but lost track of it.Yeah, it kind of turns sci-fi.
The problem with Sage is that you rarely get two in the room that agree with each others. And a lot of them seen ro have a fondness for going to the press to tell everyone the others got it wrong. Too fewThe last 12 months have been a painful cautionary tale which will hopefully turn the tide on this. Whod’ve thought - ignoring the science, not a sustainable long term strategy.
That’s the thing about a virus like SARS-CoV-2, it exposes anti-intellectualism, science denialism, and any other flaws in your systems and decision making processes in real time.
Ignoring scientists today means thousands of unnecessary deaths a few weeks from now. You can’t bury the data or rely on the consequences of those failings not becoming evident until the next election cycle.
I'm sure John Adams did after a heated exchange with Jefferson?
The problem with Sage is that you rarely get two in the room that agree with each others. And a lot of them seen ro have a fondness for going to the press to tell everyone the others got it wrong. Too few
I think the issue is finding the middle ground and sticking with it. The very public dissenting voices going back to last March have only caused to create alarm in the community. They imo need to make their argument in Sage meetings, but be a lot more careful what they say publicly.Which is fine, we’re at the cutting edge of science on a previously unknown pathogen, I’d expect debate and disagreement by scientists at that level. Behind closed doors I’m sure the Australian equivalents of Sage (CDNA and the AHPPC) would be the same.
That’s what position statements, guidelines and technical reports are for. Thrash out a middle ground.
Apparently applying an onion does somehow help treat it but still deserves it the idiot.
Um... wow!
Apparently it's a 4chan myth to catch idiots outApparently applying an onion does somehow help treat it but still deserves it the idiot.