Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

How do you leave money in the machine? Doesn't it give you the card after you take the cash?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Yeah most are like that here so probably why I forgot it's card is firstWith a lot of them now you don't insert, it's just a quick in and out.
But enough about my sex life.
Cash comes out after, but I still don't get how Cruyff left it there.
I know friends who left money at the atm, too. But I think the atm just eats the cash back after a certain period of time so it's not loss for the bank to refund you
Think he just walked away from it the machine. Good Samaritans of swanston st decided not to call out to him and pocketed it I reckonTrying to work out how this happened Cruyff - did you withdraw more than $60? ie did you withdraw $100 and accidentally left $60 behind?
Or did you withdraw $60 and just forgot to collect your cash?
Have never heard of this happening before. So am curious to know how.
Surely if it eats it back it should just debit that amount to your account.
Great for you but jeez that's leaving them open to scams.Left 60 backs in an ATM on Saturday night (Swanston St for Melbournians - so you can assume how busy it was). Didn't realise til I got to Myer on Bourke. Was bloody spewing, but got over it.
Called the bank today and they refunded it.
******* brilliant.
Look at the western conference in NBA. It's so much stronger there. I don't understand how they can't just make the playoffs combined thus allowing the two best sides in the league actually play each other. Warriors/Spurs/thunder can't ever play each other in the finals? That just seems ridiculous to me.Why? Those were 2 of the best teams all season.
I agree, bizarre system to me and that extends to the NBA, NBA and NHL as well.Look at the western conference in NBA. It's so much stronger there. I don't understand how they can't just make the playoffs combined thus allowing the two best sides in the league actually play each other. Warriors/Spurs/thunder can't ever play each other in the finals? That just seems ridiculous to me.
Imagine every year it was only United or city against chelsea or Arsenal. That would kind of get boring.
Doesn't work because of the draw. They play the same teams more often etc etc.Look at the western conference in NBA. It's so much stronger there. I don't understand how they can't just make the playoffs combined thus allowing the two best sides in the league actually play each other. Warriors/Spurs/thunder can't ever play each other in the finals? That just seems ridiculous to me.
Imagine every year it was only United or city against chelsea or Arsenal. That would kind of get boring.
who the **** wants to see Bruno Mars anyway?Coldplay. Beyoncé. Bruno Mars.
And we've got to settle for Ellie Goulding.
Time of day and size of stadium isn't the AFL's problem it's actually hiring amazing talent that are able to entertain
More people than Ellie Goulding & Chris Isaac I'd imaginewho the **** wants to see Bruno Mars anyway?
They already play 82 games though and sometimes they play teams more than other already so why not just make it 87, play each team three times and then allow the playoffs to be mixed. Or play each other twice and then have the playoffs a bit earlier. There's already far too many games in a season that it loses its meaning. At least with NFL or EPL, each game carries more weight in the context of the season.Doesn't work because of the draw. They play the same teams more often etc etc.
For instance, the bottom sides of the Western conference are weaker than the bottom sides of the Eastern (Philly excluded). But the Warriors/Thunder/Spurs play those sides more than what the Eastern conference does.
I get what you're saying but when there's 30 or 32 teams in a comp, there's no easy way to do it.