Remove this Banner Ad

The off topic thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cruyff14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
How do you leave money in the machine? Doesn't it give you the card after you take the cash?

With a lot of them now you don't insert, it's just a quick in and out.

But enough about my sex life.

Cash comes out after, but I still don't get how Cruyff left it there.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

With a lot of them now you don't insert, it's just a quick in and out.

But enough about my sex life.

Cash comes out after, but I still don't get how Cruyff left it there.
Yeah most are like that here so probably why I forgot it's card is first

Still cruffyy is a bonce
 
I know friends who left money at the atm, too. But I think the atm just eats the cash back after a certain period of time so it's not loss for the bank to refund you

Surely if it eats it back it should just debit that amount to your account.
 
Trying to work out how this happened Cruyff - did you withdraw more than $60? ie did you withdraw $100 and accidentally left $60 behind?

Or did you withdraw $60 and just forgot to collect your cash?

Have never heard of this happening before. So am curious to know how.
 
Trying to work out how this happened Cruyff - did you withdraw more than $60? ie did you withdraw $100 and accidentally left $60 behind?

Or did you withdraw $60 and just forgot to collect your cash?

Have never heard of this happening before. So am curious to know how.
Think he just walked away from it the machine. Good Samaritans of swanston st decided not to call out to him and pocketed it I reckon
 
Surely if it eats it back it should just debit that amount to your account.

I guess they don't. Ah well, banks

I've gone to atms where people left their card right in the machine. I didn't even know what I should do so I just pulled it out and left it next to the atm keyboard
 
Left 60 backs in an ATM on Saturday night (Swanston St for Melbournians - so you can assume how busy it was). Didn't realise til I got to Myer on Bourke. Was bloody spewing, but got over it.

Called the bank today and they refunded it.

******* brilliant.
Great for you but jeez that's leaving them open to scams.
 
Got a little bit on Denver by 3+ and then some more on Denver 7-12 margin. One more field goal for the Broncos and nothing else will suit me!!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Why? Those were 2 of the best teams all season.
Look at the western conference in NBA. It's so much stronger there. I don't understand how they can't just make the playoffs combined thus allowing the two best sides in the league actually play each other. Warriors/Spurs/thunder can't ever play each other in the finals? That just seems ridiculous to me.

Imagine every year it was only United or city against chelsea or Arsenal. That would kind of get boring.
 
Look at the western conference in NBA. It's so much stronger there. I don't understand how they can't just make the playoffs combined thus allowing the two best sides in the league actually play each other. Warriors/Spurs/thunder can't ever play each other in the finals? That just seems ridiculous to me.

Imagine every year it was only United or city against chelsea or Arsenal. That would kind of get boring.
I agree, bizarre system to me and that extends to the NBA, NBA and NHL as well.

Imagine splitting the afl into a vic and non vic conference and the 2 Perth sides are the best two clubs but can't play off in the GF.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Look at the western conference in NBA. It's so much stronger there. I don't understand how they can't just make the playoffs combined thus allowing the two best sides in the league actually play each other. Warriors/Spurs/thunder can't ever play each other in the finals? That just seems ridiculous to me.

Imagine every year it was only United or city against chelsea or Arsenal. That would kind of get boring.
Doesn't work because of the draw. They play the same teams more often etc etc.

For instance, the bottom sides of the Western conference are weaker than the bottom sides of the Eastern (Philly excluded). But the Warriors/Thunder/Spurs play those sides more than what the Eastern conference does.

I get what you're saying but when there's 30 or 32 teams in a comp, there's no easy way to do it.
 
Coldplay. Beyoncé. Bruno Mars.

And we've got to settle for Ellie Goulding.

Time of day and size of stadium isn't the AFL's problem it's actually hiring amazing talent that are able to entertain
who the **** wants to see Bruno Mars anyway?
 
Doesn't work because of the draw. They play the same teams more often etc etc.

For instance, the bottom sides of the Western conference are weaker than the bottom sides of the Eastern (Philly excluded). But the Warriors/Thunder/Spurs play those sides more than what the Eastern conference does.

I get what you're saying but when there's 30 or 32 teams in a comp, there's no easy way to do it.
They already play 82 games though and sometimes they play teams more than other already so why not just make it 87, play each team three times and then allow the playoffs to be mixed. Or play each other twice and then have the playoffs a bit earlier. There's already far too many games in a season that it loses its meaning. At least with NFL or EPL, each game carries more weight in the context of the season.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom