Art Vandelay_
OhhYessssss
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2012
- Posts
- 118,352
- Reaction score
- 169,677
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Bushrangers.
Been studying today. Only seen the last 10 minutesNSFB Howd Zampa look today?

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Been studying today. Only seen the last 10 minutesNSFB Howd Zampa look today?

No there isn't. Less games in a season doesn't make it more competitive. Some teams can be basically ruled out of playoff contention after 4 or 5 games in the NFL. Having 82 games just means they stay in the hunt longer.They already play 82 games though and sometimes they play teams more than other already so why not just make it 87, play each team three times and then allow the playoffs to be mixed. Or play each other twice and then have the playoffs a bit earlier. There's already far too many games in a season that it loses its meaning. At least with NFL or EPL, each game carries more weight in the context of the season.
I would rather watch them than Coldplay or Bruno Mars.More people than Ellie Goulding & Chris Isaac I'd imagine
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
They suck as much as Carlton does.Nothing wrong with Coldplay! Albeit I didn't see their performance.
There's a good reason guys like Lebron hide in the East. Pretty simple and easy trip to the finals every year.Look at the western conference in NBA. It's so much stronger there. I don't understand how they can't just make the playoffs combined thus allowing the two best sides in the league actually play each other. Warriors/Spurs/thunder can't ever play each other in the finals? That just seems ridiculous to me.
Imagine every year it was only United or city against chelsea or Arsenal. That would kind of get boring.
But they've also been very successful, also like Carlton has.They suck as much as Carlton does.
They suck now. Used to be good.But they've also been very successful, also like Carlton has.
Might not be your taste but they sold a massive amount of albums, played all around the world etc etc.
Peyton was unbelievable awful. That whole game was shit except for Miller.Pisses me off seeing HGH Manning steal a ring on his way out despite doing sfa. Von Miller MVP by miles.
I hate Eli but i liked the fact that he had more rings the Peyton despite being very average.
Their live performances last time around were great.
Admittedly I'm not as keen on this new album.
Belichick should be kicking himself. Brady couldn't do anymore in that game. No surprise the OL coach was fired straight after the gamePeyton was unbelievable awful. That whole game was shit except for Miller.
Brady must be kicking himself. He's given up a ring there.
Exactly right about NFL. That's my point. Each game in NFL has more weight because like you said, 4 or 5 losses and its tough to make playoffs from there. 82 games means that they can potentially lose the first 10 or so and still make playoffs even if it is in 8th position.No there isn't. Less games in a season doesn't make it more competitive. Some teams can be basically ruled out of playoff contention after 4 or 5 games in the NFL. Having 82 games just means they stay in the hunt longer.
87 games don't work as you'd play some clubs twice at home, 1 away (and vice versa). Shorter could work but then they lose revenue. It's the same issue the AFL has, there's no perfect way to fixture these sports.
Even the EPL can have plenty of pointless games. For instance, a club like Stoke or Palace - they won't be relegated but they won't catch the European spots. So that's half a season of pointless games for them.
He went full Trent CotchinPanthers copped the Richmond curse. Cam Newton should never have put on that Richmond jumper, will fail his whole career now.
As a Carlton fan I take this as a massive insult.They suck as much as Carlton does.
Panthers copped the Richmond curse. Cam Newton should never have put on that Richmond jumper, will fail his whole career now.
He went full Trent Cotchin
Did they go against the wind the first quarter?

How do you leave money in the machine? Doesn't it give you the card after you take the cash?
I know friends who left money at the atm, too. But I think the atm just eats the cash back after a certain period of time so it's not loss for the bank to refund you
Withdrew $60, pocketed my card and walked off. Got to Myer, my friend paid for something with cash and for some reason it made me check my wallet, realised I didn't have my cash and knew I left it in the ATM.Trying to work out how this happened Cruyff - did you withdraw more than $60? ie did you withdraw $100 and accidentally left $60 behind?
Or did you withdraw $60 and just forgot to collect your cash?
Have never heard of this happening before. So am curious to know how.
Yep, this. Someone got a free night out.Think he just walked away from it the machine. Good Samaritans of swanston st decided not to call out to him and pocketed it I reckon
Yeah well this girl at work used to work at Comm Bank and said people have done it before, and if there is a dispute or something, they will go back and review it in 6-8 months or something and just take the money back out if that's the case.Great for you but jeez that's leaving them open to scams.