Both just opposition players to me. Judd may have left for $$, however we would not have won a premiership without him, he had more of an impact in 6 years than Lynch did in 10.Judd - required player that bailed for cash at the height of his powers and nominated a club, preventing a bidding war.
Lynch - no certainty to be picked every week, had given the club 10 years, left to boost his retirement with an extra year on the K.
Either you are being very nice to Judd, or you are being too harsh on Lynch.




