Admin Notice The S29 Rules and Penalties. Go Directly To Jail.

[Ant Bear]

But if it is in the rules. How can it be ignored or overlooked?
Have we got to the stage where a committee can just make s**t up to suit their own agendas?

The grey area is whether TalkingFootyNow resigned or was delisted. From Barrybran's testimony, it seemed to be by mutual agreement; some in Committee thought otherwise and sought a vote.

It is probably not ideal to set a precedent that a player can just shift clubs whenever they like, espescially a one-gamer, but that precedent had been set in previous instances which have since been brought up in Committee, and are being discussed.

The player may also have the right of appeal on this decision, if he wants to go down that path. But the vote was a clear majority that he does not qualify for RFA.

 

[Ant Bear]

Hai, Dingster

 

[pantskyle]

Hai, Dingster

Here we go!

 

[Dingster]

Hai, Dingster

Delete your account post haste.

 

[pantskyle]

Delete your account post haste.

Here we go!

 

[Dingster]

Here we go!

Is Bearly Legal open for business?

 

[U2tigers]

Is Bearly Legal open for business?

Can't we just throw 1 captain under the Bus?

 

[Dingster]

Can't we just throw 1 captain under the Bus?

I’m not sure that I like where this is going.

 

[MWPP]

Is Bearly Legal open for business?

Is Bearly Legal the Bali spinoff of Barely Legal?

 

[TedDougChris]

I’m not sure that I like where this is going.

I'm frantically checking it's not me before I respond in any way....

 

[U2tigers]

I’m not sure that I like where this is going.

The other one.

 

[Ant Bear]

CHARGE.

The West Coast Wonders are charged with a Low Impact teamsheet offence for their R5 team submission.

A number of players were incorrectly spelt in their changes.

Changes:
Dogs105 - out to W
Bloodied52 - W to BP
KBLT - BP to out
Cactus - FP to Ro
Crusty Undies - Ro to FP
Ballarat Bulldog - W to INT
Croweater 41 - INT to W

This carries an Low impact incorrect teamsheet penalty of a warning for captain Dingster and offender Sab22. Further offences in S29 will result in a one week ban for both

Failure to submit a team sheet in the correct format (20 eligible players, positional changes, correct spelling of every name within the whole team sheet and in the team sheet submission thread), or AT ALL will result in one of the following punishments based on the appropriate grading:
Low Impact (one match suspended-ban for both captain/s and offender, activated if another team sheet offence occurs within the same season):
- Incorrect spelling of player names
- Incorrect sheet formatting according to 4B

This charge may be appealed publicly or privately, by 12pm tomorrow (Saturday Feb 29)

 

[Tony Lynn 15]

I’m not sure that I like where this is going.

Happy to help mate if needed.

 

[U2tigers]

CHARGE.

The West Coast Wonders are charged with a Low Impact teamsheet offence for their R5 team submission.

A number of players were incorrectly spelt in their changes.


This carries an Low impact incorrect teamsheet penalty of a warning for captain Dingster and offender Sab22. Further offences in S29 will result in a one week ban for both



This charge may be appealed publicly or privately, by 12pm tomorrow (Saturday Feb 29)

Well adjudicated fellow Wonder.

 

[WaynesWorld19]

The grey area is whether TalkingFootyNow resigned or was delisted. From Barrybran's testimony, it seemed to be by mutual agreement; some in Committee thought otherwise and sought a vote.

It is probably not ideal to set a precedent that a player can just shift clubs whenever they like, espescially a one-gamer, but that precedent had been set in previous instances which have since been brought up in Committee, and are being discussed.

The player may also have the right of appeal on this decision, if he wants to go down that path. But the vote was a clear majority that he does not qualify for RFA.

Poor Metalcrusher

 

[WaynesWorld19]

I’m not sure that I like where this is going.

You know Ding, I'll stickup for ya ......that maynot give you much comfort though

 

[WaynesWorld19]

CHARGE.

The West Coast Wonders are charged with a Low Impact teamsheet offence for their R5 team submission.

A number of players were incorrectly spelt in their changes.


This carries an Low impact incorrect teamsheet penalty of a warning for captain Dingster and offender Sab22. Further offences in S29 will result in a one week ban for both



This charge may be appealed publicly or privately, by 12pm tomorrow (Saturday Feb 29)

I left a number 15 off Tony Lynn 15 and got a week ......and miraculously survived a hanging and a further week for the teamsheet ......so obviously 4 infringements is less serious than one ......OK I get it

 

[pantskyle]

Is Bearly Legal open for business?

Absolutely. No crime too small, no small too crime.

 

[Dingster]

You know Ding, I'll stickup for ya ......that maynot give you much comfort though

I left a number 15 off Tony Lynn 15 and got a week ......and miraculously survived a hanging a further week for the teamsheet ......so obviously 4 infringements is less serious than one ......OK I get it

When you say stick up, did you mean my ass because I’m feeling a tad uneasy.

 

[WaynesWorld19]

When you say stick up, did you mean my ass because I’m feeling a tad uneasy.

That 2nd post, was me just wanting to hang out with the "Cool" group .....when it comes to voting, you know I've got your back

 

[Dingster]

Absolutely. No crime too small, no small too crime.

You’re hired. Start with a clandestine visit to Sab22

 

[pantskyle]

You’re hired. Start with a clandestine visit to Sab22

Tigerturbulance we've got another client!

 

[WaynesWorld19]

You’re hired. Start with a clandestine visit to Sab22

 

[Ned_Flanders]

CHARGE.

The West Coast Wonders are charged with a Low Impact teamsheet offence for their R5 team submission.

A number of players were incorrectly spelt in their changes.


This carries an Low impact incorrect teamsheet penalty of a warning for captain Dingster and offender Sab22. Further offences in S29 will result in a one week ban for both



This charge may be appealed publicly or privately, by 12pm tomorrow (Saturday Feb 29)

I have a question AB. The rules state this:

A further clarification, these penalties apply to ALL potential team submission errors.

You gave a suspended sentence (per the rule) for ONE breach of the rule. What happened to the other three errors? This isn't COSTCO, you don't get a discount for ******* up in bulk.

 

[Ant Bear]

I left a number 15 off Tony Lynn 15 and got a week ......and miraculously survived a hanging a further week for the teamsheet ......so obviously 4 infringements is less serious than one ......OK I get it

I have a question AB. The rules state this:

A further clarification, these penalties apply to ALL potential team submission errors.

You gave a suspended sentence (per the rule) for ONE breach of the rule. What happened to the other three errors? This isn't COSTCO, you don't get a discount for ******* up in bulk.

It's one teamsheet, but if it makes you feel better, they can have four warnings?