-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
The talent league ladder
- Thread starter FlavaFlav
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Banned
- #2
Surely the saints and freo would be closer to the top given the amount of young players they have got through the draft in the last few years.
Aren't Collingwood supposed to be ordinary on talent but well coached? I'd say they're too high.
Essendon are far too high as well. They're a bit like the Bulldogs, great top tier players but it falls away after that.
Essendon are far too high as well. They're a bit like the Bulldogs, great top tier players but it falls away after that.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Coll_RP
Senior List
Saints may have a lot young players but that doesn't mean they all have talent.
Freo and Saints Higher.
Crows above Power.
Sydney lower (though they have done everything this year to make AFL critics think otherwise)
Collingwood and Essendon Lower.
Bit harsh on the roos.
Bah... ill just do mine.
1. Brisbane
2. Crows
3. Port
4. Freo
5. Saints
6. Eagles
7. Collingwood
8. Hawks
9. Dons
10. Roos
11. Swans
12. tigerz
13. Dees
14. Geelong
15. Dogs
16. Caaarlton
Crows above Power.
Sydney lower (though they have done everything this year to make AFL critics think otherwise)
Collingwood and Essendon Lower.
Bit harsh on the roos.
Bah... ill just do mine.
1. Brisbane
2. Crows
3. Port
4. Freo
5. Saints
6. Eagles
7. Collingwood
8. Hawks
9. Dons
10. Roos
11. Swans
12. tigerz
13. Dees
14. Geelong
15. Dogs
16. Caaarlton
Richmond at 11, turn it up.
That more than anything else shows the fantasy that this is.
That more than anything else shows the fantasy that this is.
oops my badOriginally posted by DaveW
So Melbourne should hope that next time they play the blue and white hoops that Geelong turn up and not the Cats?
i was wondering who i was missing out, and i was switching between club nicknames and mascots Post is updated.
Denni Commetti says of Port: "It can be the most physical side in the competition. The Power is collectively, the best foot-skilled team I have ever seen. Warren Tredrea and Chad Cornes are awesome marking options up forward. Plus Port has wonderful depth".
Re: Re: Re: The talent league ladder
Perhaps you then could explain how an apparently talentless team can be currently competing for 2nd position?
Honestly, this has to be THE dumbest thread going around. I love how, when faced with a situation that people don't like (ie Sydneyphobes having our success thrust in their faces), they begin to argue intangibles. It's so damn... predictable.
Originally posted by evade28
haha youre just sooking cos sydney is so low down on his list!
Perhaps you then could explain how an apparently talentless team can be currently competing for 2nd position?
Honestly, this has to be THE dumbest thread going around. I love how, when faced with a situation that people don't like (ie Sydneyphobes having our success thrust in their faces), they begin to argue intangibles. It's so damn... predictable.
Yianni
Norm Smith Medallist
This is a stupid thread.
Anyway, if you're going to do this analysis at least do it properly.
Talent doesn't have to be realised, it just has to be there. It can be latent, which is why it's so hard to analyse and why this is a stupid thread.
That's what I thought you were going to do with this thread, analyse which teams - given the talent on their list performing to their potential - are better than the others. But then you write stuff like that above which seems to indicate that you're basing your analysis on current and previous form.
Totally inconsistent!
Saints and Freo may have had one good to medium year but that's fine. The question that YOU proposed was which team was more talented. They both may well be more talented than Collingwood, it just means that St. Kilda and Freo are UNDERACHIEVING whereas Collingwood may be OVERACHIEVING.
The way you've done it you may as well have called the thread "BEST TEAMS OF LAST TWO YEARS"
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Moo://_Cow
Team Captain
interesting where you positioned geelong especially with melbourne ahead of them.
Def by Brisbane Lions= 14 points
Def by West Coast= 16 points
Def by Adelaide= 17 points
Def by Fremantle= 16 points
Def Port Adelaide= 1 point
Def by Collingwood= 24 points
Drew West Coast
Yet you've put melbourne infont of geelong, care to explain that?
Def by Brisbane Lions= 14 points
Def by West Coast= 16 points
Def by Adelaide= 17 points
Def by Fremantle= 16 points
Def Port Adelaide= 1 point
Def by Collingwood= 24 points
Drew West Coast
Yet you've put melbourne infont of geelong, care to explain that?
F
Fall Out Boy
Guest
Talent isn't always reflected in results.
- May 26, 2003
- 25,407
- 21,658
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- SFFC, Aussie Women's Cricket, HNK
If you lived in WA you would know that you can never believe a single word Dennis says...
- Banned
- #24
How the F$ck is geelong 15th they have some of the most talented youngsters in the comp where you put Hawthorn and Sydney in front of us they are the least talented sides in the omp.
2000 we made the Grand Final and lost to the strongest team in the modern era.
2002 we were a couple of kicks away from playing in the Preliminary Final against Collingwood (if it wasn't for some in-match injuries perhaps)
What have Geelong done in that time?
Similar threads
