This is scary

[Rohan Coventry]

This is scary.

If the pic does not work, try this:

http://www.elevenoclock.com/cgi-bin/forums/mb.cgi?forum=EBWBulletInBoard&read=022016-000000.msg

 

[Darky]

For the reasons stated in the comments posted below the pic, I very much doubt it's real.

 

[topdon]

Oh dear!

Surely that plane has been superimposed!?!

 

[hawkfan5]

fake

looks very fake

 

[SPUNKY_MONKEY45]

yeh looks pretty fake to me...

try this out..
type the flight number Q33NY into a new document in word...then enlarge it to 72 and change font to windings...
scary!!!
its the flight number from the plane that crashed into the WTC

 

[BomberBoy]

Geeez, some people have too much time on their hands

 

[SPUNKY_MONKEY45]

Originally posted by BomberBoy
Geeez, some people have too much time on their hands

lol yeh we noticed that AGES ago....
but really it is sorta freaky...

 

[Joe Mama]

I doubt if that's real, firstly the noise of the aircraft would have alerted the fella in the photo and the guy taking it, so I doubt that any photo would have survived the impact and found in the rubble without being damaged beyond recoognition.

 

[M29]

Originally posted by SPUNKY_MONKEY45
yeh looks pretty fake to me...

try this out..
type the flight number Q33NY into a new document in word...then enlarge it to 72 and change font to windings...
scary!!!
its the flight number from the plane that crashed into the WTC

As mentioned in another post, that wasn't a flight number. Only because it has NY in it do people believe it, still weird though. One question about the pick, how would the camera have survived?

 

[Lethal]

Originally posted by M29

One question about the pick, how would the camera have survived?

you would think that the plane would be blurry being that close to the camera

 

[M29]

Originally posted by Lethal


you would think that the plane would be blurry being that close to the camera

Yes, also surely the guy with the camera would have said "**** RUN!" Plus the date on the pic looks abit sus. I mean how its typed. Most timestamped pics have smaller and brighter numbers.

 

[aggels]

Even if the camera and film had survived (which I very much doubt), who, upon finding a camera that didn't belong to them, would develop the film immediately, and then put the pictures on the internet?

 

[M29]

Originally posted by aggels
Even if the camera and film had survived (which I very much doubt), who, upon finding a camera that didn't belong to them, would develop the film immediately, and then put the pictures on the internet?

Some sick bastard. Although, it is america, nothing would suprise.

 

[Dipper]

Originally posted by SPUNKY_MONKEY45
yeh looks pretty fake to me...

try this out..
type the flight number Q33NY into a new document in word...then enlarge it to 72 and change font to windings...
scary!!!
its the flight number from the plane that crashed into the WTC

I've read about this one, you get a graphic of a plane, 2 towers,a skull type thing & a star of David pretty freaky until you realise that none of the planes actually had the flight number Q33NY.

 

[aggels]

Originally posted by M29


Some sick bastard. Although, it is america, nothing would suprise.

Yeah, but the thing is, it would have been covered in rubble, surely they didn't let people scrummage through rubble, and the firefighters and the like doing the rescue operation... well I would have thought they had more important things to worry about. All in all, it's very unlikely.

 

[Macca19]

Originally posted by SPUNKY_MONKEY45
yeh looks pretty fake to me...

try this out..
type the flight number Q33NY into a new document in word...then enlarge it to 72 and change font to windings...
scary!!!
its the flight number from the plane that crashed into the WTC

er no its not the flight number. Seeing as the flight was HIJACKED...why would the flight number include the NY, even tho it was off to chicago or LA or something...and NOT NY???

 

[Macca19]

Originally posted by aggels
Even if the camera and film had survived (which I very much doubt), who, upon finding a camera that didn't belong to them, would develop the film immediately, and then put the pictures on the internet?

exactly. Its fake. For a start the plane looks a lot smaller than what it would really be...plus the plane was on an angle when it hit...that plane look pretty straight to me

 

[Rohan Coventry]

Originally posted by Macca19


er no its not the flight number. Seeing as the flight was HIJACKED...why would the flight number include the NY, even tho it was off to chicago or LA or something...and NOT NY???

Flight numbers/letters are based on the airline. i.e Quantas has Q before its numbers.

 

[Macca19]

Originally posted by Rohan Coventry


Flight numbers/letters are based on the airline. i.e Quantas has Q before its numbers.

mmm. What is the NY for?? what is it? New York Airlines?
the REAL flight number didnt have the NY in it

 

[Lethal]

Originally posted by Macca19


mmm. What is the NY for?? what is it? New York Airlines?
the REAL flight number didnt have the NY in it

the NY was just something someone put in there because people see NY and think oh my god,that is freaky
im not sure of the actual flight numbers myself,cant remember them off the top of my head but just say it was united airlines flight 11 to los angeles then it would be UA11LA.......i hope im correct

 

[Blues_Brat]

The "Q33NY" crud is proof of the gullibility of people. We heard the flight numbers many times during the coverage of the attacks, yet so many people beleived that it was for real.

No wonder people beleived the fake Nostradamus predictions. Even his 'real' predictions are dodgy, they've been twisted to fit the meaning of events after they happened.

I had a massive argument with a woman at work who started talking to me about Nostradamus.. "how did he know about steel birds, it's all so amazing" she said. I explained to her that it wasn't real.. but noooo she swears black and blue that Nostradamus "said it, he really did".. pffft.

 

[Fat Red]

Originally posted by Lethal


the NY was just something someone put in there because people see NY and think oh my god,that is freaky
im not sure of the actual flight numbers myself,cant remember them off the top of my head but just say it was united airlines flight 11 to los angeles then it would be UA11LA.......i hope im correct

Actually, it would just be UA11. Or UA 11 BOS-LAX (I'm making up the code for Boston but the one for LA is right). The codes for the New York airports are JFK and LGA anyway.

 

[GOALden Hawk]

The Q33NY is rubbish - none of the flights had that number.

When I went up the WTC back in 1998 you didn't go outside - the observation deck was enclosed in glass on the 107th floor.

But maybe there is an outside deck as well - but I can't remember it when I went up there.

Anyway, the photo is a fake - I got sent another one today with the same picture, except a Bayside train was superimposed!

 

[kizza]

Originally posted by M29


As mentioned in another post, that wasn't a flight number. Only because it has NY in it do people believe it, still weird though. One question about the pick, how would the camera have survived?

OF course that photo is a fake!!
And about the flight number, what do you guys think the plane was, a Qantas flight!

 

[CJH]

Originally posted by GOALden Hawk


...

Anyway, the photo is a fake - I got sent another one today with the same picture, except a Bayside train was superimposed!

Would you be able to publish this photo Goalden Hawk?